Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of linear measurements on 3D surface models using CBCT data segmentation obtained by automatic standard pre-set thresholds in two segmentation software programs: an in vitro study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of linear measurements on three-dimensional (3D) surface models obtained by standard pre-set thresholds in two segmentation software programs.

Materials and methods

Ten mandibles with 17 silica markers were scanned for 0.3-mm voxels in the i-CAT Classic (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA, USA). Twenty linear measurements were carried out by two observers two times on the 3D surface models: the Dolphin Imaging 11.5 (Dolphin Imaging & Management Solutions, Chatsworth, CA, USA), using two filters(Translucent and Solid-1), and in the InVesalius 3.0.0 (Centre for Information Technology Renato Archer, Campinas, SP, Brazil). The physical measurements were made by another observer two times using a digital caliper on the dry mandibles.

Results

Excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability for the markers, physical measurements, and 3D surface models were found (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson’s r ≥ 0.91). The linear measurements on 3D surface models by Dolphin and InVesalius software programs were accurate (Dolphin Solid-1 > InVesalius > Dolphin Translucent). The highest absolute and percentage errors were obtained for the variable R1–R1 (1.37 mm) and MF–AC (2.53 %) in the Dolphin Translucent and InVesalius software, respectively.

Conclusion

Linear measurements on 3D surface models obtained by standard pre-set thresholds in the Dolphin and InVesalius software programs are reliable and accurate compared with physical measurements.

Clinical relevance

Studies that evaluate the reliability and accuracy of the 3D models are necessary to ensure error predictability and to establish diagnosis, treatment plan, and prognosis in a more realistic way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blattner TC, George N, Lee CC, Kumar V, Yelton CD (2010) Efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography as a modality to accurately identify the presence of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first and second molars: a pilot study. J Endod 36:867–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenberg PA, Frisbie J, Lee J, Lee K, Frommer H, Kottal S, Phelan J, Lin L, Fisch G (2010) Evaluation of pathologists (histopathology) and radiologists (cone beam computed tomography) differentiating radicular cysts from granulomas. J Endod 36:423–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Garib DG, Raymundo Jr R, Raymundo MV, Raymundo DV, Ferreira SN (2007) Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): understandind this new imaging diagnostic method with promissing application in Orthodontics. Dental Press J Orthod 141:139–156

  4. Berco M, Rigali PH Jr, Miner RM, DeLuca S, Anderson NK, Will LA (2009) Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136(17):e11–19

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moreira CR, Sales MA, Lopes PM, Cavalcanti MG (2009) Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108:430–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P (2006) Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 72:75–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG (2008) Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod 78:387–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y (2010) Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137(16):e11–16

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gribel BF, Gribel MN, Frazao DC, McNamara JA Jr, Manzi FR (2011) Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans. Angle Orthod 81:26–35. doi:10.2319/032210-166.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Engelbrecht WP, Fourie Z, Damstra J, Gerrits PO, Ren Y (2013) The influence of the segmentation process on 3D measurements from cone beam computed tomography-derived surface models. Clin Oral Investig 17:1919–1927. doi:10.1007/s00784-012-0881-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nada RM, van Loon B, Maal TJ, Berge SJ, Mostafa YA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Schols JG (2013) Three-dimensional evaluation of soft tissue changes in the orofacial region after tooth-borne and bone-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Clin Oral Investig 17:2017–2024. doi:10.1007/s00784-013-0927-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Choi JY, Choi JH, Kim NK, Kim Y, Lee JK, Kim MK, Lee JH, Kim MJ (2002) Analysis of errors in medical rapid prototyping models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 31:23–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lopes PM, Moreira CR, Perrella A, Antunes JL, Cavalcanti MG (2008) 3-D volume rendering maxillofacial analysis of angular measurements by multislice CT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 105:224–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown AA, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG (2009) Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images. Angle Orthod 79:150–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ballrick JW, Palomo JM, Ruch E, Amberman BD, Hans MG (2008) Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134:573–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Loubele M, Jacobs R, Maes F, Denis K, White S, Coudyzer W, Lambrichts I, van Steenberghe D, Suetens P (2008) Image quality vs radiation dose of four cone beam computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37:309–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y (2011) Reliability and the smallest detectable difference of measurements on 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140:e107–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim M, Huh KH, Yi WJ, Heo MS, Lee SS, Choi SC (2012) Evaluation of accuracy of 3D reconstruction images using multi-detector CT and cone-beam CT. Imaging Sci Dent 42:25–33. doi:10.5624/isd.2012.42.1.25

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mischkowski RA, Pulsfort R, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Brochhagen HG, Keeve E, Zoller JE (2007) Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104:551–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lagravere MO, Carey J, Toogood RW, Major PW (2008) Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134:112–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun Z, Smith T, Kortam S, Kim DG, Tee BC, Fields H (2011) Effect of bone thickness on alveolar bone-height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:e117–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hans MG (2009) Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:19–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Rawi B, Hassan B, Vandenberge B, Jacobs R (2010) Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of teeth from cone beam computed tomography scans. J Oral Rehabil 37:352–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Sanderink G (2009) Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position. Eur J Orthod 31:129–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Grauer D, Cevidanes LS, Proffit WR (2009) Working with DICOM craniofacial images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:460–470

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo Lupion Poleti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poleti, M.L., Fernandes, T.M.F., Pagin, O. et al. Analysis of linear measurements on 3D surface models using CBCT data segmentation obtained by automatic standard pre-set thresholds in two segmentation software programs: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Invest 20, 179–185 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1485-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1485-5

Keywords

Navigation