Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of dentin and enamel pretreatment with acidic sulfur compounds on adhesive performance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study tested the potential hampering effects of acidic sulfur compounds (ASC) containing hydroxybenzene sulfonic acid, hydroxymethoxybenzene sulfonic acid, and sulfuric acid, prior to self-etch and etch-and-rinse bonding procedures on enamel and dentin. According to the manufacturer, ASC should be applied after cavity preparation and prior to application of a primer in order to reduce the remaining biofilm in the preparation cavity. Despite promoted marketing, data on the investigated liquid are almost completely lacking.

Material and methods

One hundred and fifty-two extracted mandibular bovine incisors were embedded and polished to expose either enamel (E) or dentin (D). Then, specimens were randomly divided and conditioned as follows (n = 12/group): ASC and consecutive phosphoric acid application (E1/D1), ASC (E2/D2; E5/D5), phosphoric acid (E3/D3), and no conditioning (E4/D4; E6/D6). Groups were then treated with either Optibond FL® (etch-and-rinse; 1–4) or Clearfil SE Bond® (self-etch; 5–6). Hollow acrylic cylinders were bonded with a hybrid composite resin (Filtek Supreme XTE®) to the specimens, and the shear bond strength was measured (1 mm/min). In addition, failure types were assessed. Descriptive statistics and statistical analyses were performed with one-way ANOVA followed by the Scheffé post hoc test.

Results

For enamel, the highest shear bond strength values were obtained applying routine bonding procedures (23.5 ± 5.6 MPa for etch-and-rinse and 26.0 ± 6.0 MPa for self-etch, respectively). In contrast, dentin pretreatment with a combination of ASC and phosphoric acid led to the highest shear bond values (22.8 ± 4.1 MPa).

Conclusion

This study shows that ASC prior to dental restoration placement cannot be recommended for etch-and-rinse procedures on enamel but is appropriate for dentin without interfering with routine bonding procedures.

Clinical relevance

The application of acidic sulfur compounds prior to adhesive restoration placement should be restricted to dentin only as it may negatively influence shear bond strength on sound enamel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. York AK, Arthur JS (1993) Reasons for placement and replacement of dental restorations in the United States Navy Dental Corps. Oper Dent 18(5):203–208

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamouda IM, Al-Khodary AM, El Shami FM (2010) Degree of conversion and antimicrobial activity of etch-and-rinse versus self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 12(1):33–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mejare B, Mejare I, Edwardsson S (1979) Bacteria beneath composite restorations—a culturing and histobacteriological study. Acta Odontol Scand 37(5):267–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schmidlin OA, Zehnder M, Schmidlin PR (2003) Effectiveness of dentine bonding agents against cariogenic bacteria in vitro: a comparison of two methods. Oral Microbiol Immunol 18(3):140–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lennon AM, Buchalla W, Rassner B, Becker K, Attin T (2006) Efficiency of 4 caries excavation methods compared. Oper Dent 31(5):551–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kidd EA, Ricketts DN, Beighton D (1996) Criteria for caries removal at the enamel–dentine junction: a clinical and microbiological study. Br Dent J 180(8):287–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoshino E, Ando N, Sato M, Kota K (1992) Bacterial invasion of non-exposed dental pulp. Int Endod J 25(1):2–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reeves R, Stanley HR (1966) The relationship of bacterial penetration and pulpal pathosis in carious teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 22(1):59–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin FE, Nadkarni MA, Jacques NA, Hunter N (2002) Quantitative microbiological study of human carious dentine by culture and real-time PCR: association of anaerobes with histopathological changes in chronic pulpitis. J Clin Microbiol 40(5):1698–1704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vahdaty A, Pitt Ford TR, Wilson RF (1993) Efficacy of chlorhexidine in disinfecting dentinal tubules in vitro. Endod Dent Traumatol 9(6):243–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lottanti S, Gautschi H, Sener B, Zehnder M (2009) Effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic, etidronic and peracetic acid irrigation on human root dentine and the smear layer. Int Endod J 42(4):335–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zehnder M (2006) Root canal irrigants. J Endod 32(5):389–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Osorio R, Ceballos L, Tay F, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA, Toledano M (2002) Effect of sodium hypochlorite on dentin bonding with a polyalkenoic acid-containing adhesive system. J Biomed Mater Res 60(2):316–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pilo R, Cardash HS, Oz-Ari B, Ben-Amar A (2001) Effect of preliminary treatment of the dentin surface on the shear bond strength of resin composite to dentin. Oper Dent 26(6):569–575

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor-Hardy TL, Leonard RH Jr, Mauriello SM, Swift EJ Jr (2001) Effect of dental unit waterline biocides on enamel bond strengths. Gen Dent 49(4):421–425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakajima M, Sano H, Urabe I, Tagami J, Pashley DH (2000) Bond strengths of single-bottle dentin adhesives to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 25(1):2–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakajima M, Ogata M, Harada N, Tagami J, Pashley DH (2000) Bond strengths of self-etching primer adhesives to in vitro-demineralized dentin following mineralizing treatment. J Adhes Dent 2(1):29–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjaderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A (2011) State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 27(1):1–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B, Wieland M, Attin T, Hammerle CH, Fischer J (2010) Effect of different surface pre-treatments and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK. Dent Mater 26(6):553–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ciba-Geigy (1980) Wissenschaftliche Tabellen Geigy, vol 8. Teilband Statistik, Basel

  21. Silverstone LM, Saxton CA, Dogon IL, Fejerskov O (1975) Variation in the pattern of acid etching of human dental enamel examined by scanning electron microscopy. Caries Res 9(5):373–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. HybenX (2012) http://dentaldesiccants.com/uploads/HybenX_usechart.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2012

  23. Porter SR, Al-Johani K, Fedele S, Moles DR (2009) Randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of HybenX in the symptomatic treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Oral Dis 15(2):155–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Taschner M, Nato F, Mazzoni A, Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Di Lenarda R, Petschelt A, Breschi L (2010) Role of preliminary etching for one-step self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 118(5):517–524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Aguilar-Mendoza JA, Rosales-Leal JI, Rodriguez-Valverde MA, Gonzalez-Lopez S, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA (2008) Wettability and bonding of self-etching dental adhesives. Influence of the smear layer. Dent Mater 24(7):994–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Reis A, Grandi V, Carlotto L, Bortoli G, Patzlaff R, Rodrigues Accorinte Mde L, Dourado Loguercio A (2005) Effect of smear layer thickness and acidity of self-etching solutions on early and long-term bond strength to dentin. J Dent 33(7):549–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Arrais CA, Giannini M, Nakajima M, Tagami J (2004) Effects of additional and extended acid etching on bonding to caries-affected dentine. Eur J Oral Sci 112(5):458–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoshiyama M, Carvalho R, Sano H, Horner J, Brewer PD, Pashley DH (1995) Interfacial morphology and strength of bonds made to superficial versus deep dentin. Am J Dent 8(6):297–302

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Perdigao J, May KN Jr, Wilder AD Jr, Lopes M (2000) The effect of depth of dentin demineralization on bond strengths and morphology of the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 25(3):186–194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Erhardt MC, Cavalcante LM, Pimenta LA (2004) Influence of phosphoric acid pretreatment on self-etching bond strengths. J Esthet Restor Dent 16(1):33–40, discussion 41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ikeda M, Kurokawa H, Sunada N, Tamura Y, Takimoto M, Murayama R, Ando S, Miyazaki M (2009) Influence of previous acid etching on dentin bond strength of self-etch adhesives. J Oral Sci 51(4):527–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV (2010) Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review. Dent Mater 26(2):e78–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Salz U, Bock T (2010) Testing adhesion of direct restoratives to dental hard tissue—a review. J Adhes Dent 12(5):343–371

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schilke R, Lisson JA, Bauss O, Geurtsen W (2000) Comparison of the number and diameter of dentinal tubules in human and bovine dentine by scanning electron microscopic investigation. Arch Oral Biol 45(5):355–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T (1983) Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res 62(10):1076–1081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schmidlin PR, Siebenmann J, Kocher P, Seemann R, Attin T, Bindl A (2008) Effects of de- and remineralization of dentin on bond strengths yielded by 1-, 3-, and 4-step adhesives. J Adhes Dent 10(2):119–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hahn P, Hellwig E (2004) An in vitro investigation of penetration depth of dentine bonding agents into carious dentine. J Oral Rehabil 31(11):1053–1060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Imazato S, Walls AW, Kuramoto A, Ebisu S (2002) Penetration of an antibacterial dentine-bonding system into demineralized human root dentine in vitro. Eur J Oral Sci 110(2):168–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Albert Trottmann and Felix Schmutz for their support. We are grateful to EPIEN Medical for their support with the materials.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick R. Schmidlin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ioannidis, A., Stawarczyk, B., Sener, B. et al. Influence of dentin and enamel pretreatment with acidic sulfur compounds on adhesive performance. Clin Oral Invest 17, 1885–1892 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0877-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0877-z

Keywords

Navigation