Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Two-year clinical evaluation of composite resins in non-carious cervical lesions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this double-blind, randomised trial was to compare the clinical performance of a hybrid composite (Clearfil AP-X, Kuraray, Tokyo) and a nanocomposite (Filtek Z350, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN) over a period of 2 years in non-carious class V lesions using a modified US Public Health Service (USPHS) system.

Methods

Forty-six patients with at least one pair of equivalent non-carious cervical lesions under occlusion and a mean age of 44.1 years (range 27–66 years; median 45 years) were enrolled in this study. A total of 116 restorations (58 with each material) were placed according to manufacturer's instructions by two calibrated operators. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 months after placement using the USPHS criteria for retention, colour match, marginal discolouration, marginal adaptation, anatomic form, surface texture and secondary caries. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Cochran and the McNemar tests at a significance level of 5 % (P < 0.05).

Results

No surface texture changes or secondary caries were detected in association with any restorations. The retention rates for Clearfil AP-X (100 %) and for Filtek Z350 (91.38 %) did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). Two Z350 restorations were completely lost after 2 years. No significant differences were observed in the colour match, marginal discolouration, marginal adaptation or anatomic form.

Conclusions

There were no significant differences in the clinical performances between the materials.

Clinical relevance

Both restorative materials exhibited acceptable clinical performance in class V non-carious lesions 2 years post-restoration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Borcic J, Anic I, Urek MM, Ferreri S (2004) The prevalence of non-carious cervical lesions in permanent dentition. J Oral Rehabil 31:117–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO (1994) Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 22:195–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Demirci M, Sancakli HS, Uysal O (2008) Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class V carious lesions: 5-year results. Clin Oral Investig 12:157–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Loguercio AD, Zago C, Leal K, Ribeiro NR, Reis A (2005) One-year clinical evaluation of a flowable resin liner associated with a microhybrid resin in noncarious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig 9:18–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2012) A 13-year clinical evaluation of two three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious class-V lesions. Clin Oral Investig 16:129–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN (2003) An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 134:1382–1390

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beun S, Glorieux T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G (2007) Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dent Mater 23:51–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rodrigues JS, Zanchi CH, Carvalho RV, Demarco FF (2007) Flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of different types of resin-based composites. Braz Oral Res 21:16–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ryge G (1980) Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 30:347–358

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maneenut C, Tyas MJ (1995) Clinical evaluation of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative cements in cervical ‘abrasion’ lesions: one-year results. Quintessence Int 26:739–743

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B (2001) Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 3:237–245

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Landuyt KL, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2006) Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching. J Dent 34:77–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miyazaki M, Oshida Y, Xirouchaki L (1996) Dentin bonding system. Part I: Literature review. Biomed Mater Eng 6:15–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Perdigao J, Lopes M (1999) Dentin bonding—questions for the new millennium. J Adhes Dent 1:191–209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B (2004) Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 83:454–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Turkun SL (2003) Clinical evaluation of a self-etching and a one-bottle adhesive system at two years. J Dent 31:527–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Peumans M, Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2005) Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 113:512–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van Dijken JW (2010) A prospective 8-year evaluation of a mild two-step self-etching adhesive and a heavily filled two-step etch-and-rinse system in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 26:940–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Armstrong SR, Vargas MA, Fang Q, Laffoon JE (2003) Microtensile bond strength of a total-etch 3-step, total-etch 2-step, self-etch 2-step, and a self-etch 1-step dentin bonding system through 15-month water storage. J Adhes Dent 5:47–56

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brackett WW, Covey DA, St GHJ (2002) One-year clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive in class V resin composites cured by two methods. Oper Dent 27:218–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van Dijken JW (2004) Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in class V non-carious cervical dentin lesions. Am J Dent 17:27–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH (1991) Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results. Quintessence Int 22:687–692

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Neo J, Chew CL, Yap A, Sidhu S (1996) Clinical evaluation of tooth-colored materials in cervical lesions. Am J Dent 9:15–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Turkun LS (2005) The clinical performance of one- and two-step self-etching adhesive systems at one year. J Am Dent Assoc 136:656–664

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF (2002) Three-year clinical evaluation of One-Step in non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent 15:309–311

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H, Hayashi Y (2006) Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 34:97–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Akimoto N, Takamizu M, Momoi Y (2007) 10-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching adhesive system. Oper Dent 32:3–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Burrow MF, Tyas MJ (2007) Five-year clinical evaluation of One-Up Bond F in non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent 20:361–364

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 9:7–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hinkel R (2000) Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study. Oper Dent 25:251–258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kurokawa H, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, Rikuta A, Tsubota K, Uekusa S (2007) One-year clinical evaluation of five single-step self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater J 26:14–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R (2001) Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results. Am J Dent 14:153–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN, Roulet JF (2003) Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 5:323–332

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Rao for the statistical analysis and Ms. Yu-Ting Yang (University of London) for editorial assistance with the manuscript. This study was supported by a Scientific Research grant (No. 07B031000002) from the Guang-dong Province, China.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Operative and Endodontics, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, 56 Lingyuan West Road, Guangzhou, 510055, People’s Republic of China

    Wei Qin, Zhi Song, Yun-Yao Ye & Zheng-Mei Lin

Authors
  1. Wei Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhi Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yun-Yao Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zheng-Mei Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zheng-Mei Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qin, W., Song, Z., Ye, YY. et al. Two-year clinical evaluation of composite resins in non-carious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Invest 17, 799–804 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0780-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0780-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation