Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Shape of the lateral edge of the first metatarsal head changes depending on the rotation and inclination of the first metatarsal: a study using digitally reconstructed radiographs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Background

Correction of pronation deformity and metatarsal primus varus is an important component of hallux valgus surgery, necessary to achieve a satisfactory correction and to prevent post-operative recurrence. Roundness of the lateral edge of the first metatarsal head (round sign) on the dorsoplantar radiograph of the foot has been empirically advocated as an indicator of first metatarsal pronation. The purpose of this study was to clarify the effect of rotation and inclination of the first metatarsal on the shape of the lateral edge of the first metatarsal head.

Methods

Computed tomographic images of feet in 30 subjects, without pathology of the first metatarsophalangeal joint, were included. Digitally reconstructed radiographs of the first metatarsal were created using the computed tomographic data. Thirty-nine images were created of each first metatarsal at different degrees of rotation (−10° to 30° of pronation) and inclination (−10° to 20° of plantarflexion). Then, the shape of the lateral edge of the first metatarsal head was classified into three types: angular, intermediate, and round. Generalized estimation equations were used to test if the shapes of the first metatarsal head were significantly different across the range of pronation and plantarflexion angles.

Results

The positive round sign changed to negative as the first metatarsal supinated. In most feet, these changes occurred as the pronation angle decreased from 10° to 0°. The positive round sign also changed to negative as the first metatarsal head plantarflexed.

Conclusion

Positive round sign of the first metatarsal head on the dorsoplantar radiograph of the foot was significantly associated with increased pronation as well as decreased inclination of the first metatarsal. Negative round sign may be used as an indicator of effective correction of first metatarsal pronation during hallux valgus surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Collan L, Kankare JA, Mattila K. The biomechanics of the first metatarsal bone in hallux valgus: a preliminary study utilizing a weight bearing extremity CT. Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;19(3):155–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Saltzman CL, Brandser EA, Anderson CM, Berbaum KS, Brown TD. Coronal plane rotation of the first metatarsal. Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17(3):157–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mortier JP, Bernard JL, Maestro M. Axial rotation of the first metatarsal head in a normal population and hallux valgus patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98(6):677–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coester LM, Saltzman CL, Leupold J, Pontarelli W. Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(A(2)):219–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morris J, Ryan M. First metatarsal base osteotomies for hallux abducto valgus deformities. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2014;31(2):247–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Little JB. First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis in the treatment of hallux valgus. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2014;31(2):281–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Duan X, Kadakia AR. Salvage of recurrence after failed surgical treatment of hallux valgus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(4):477–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Okuda R, Yasuda T, Jotoku T, Shima H. Supination stress of the great toe for assessing intraoperative correction of hallux valgus. J Orthop Sci. 2012;17(2):129–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dayton P, Kauwe M, Feilmeier M. Is our current paradigm for evaluation and management of the bunion deformity flawed? a discussion of procedure philosophy relative to anatomy. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54(1):102–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DiDomenico LA, Fahim R, Rollandini J, Thomas ZM. Correction of frontal plane rotation of sesamoid apparatus during the Lapidus procedure: a novel approach. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;53(2):248–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Klemola T, Leppilahti J, Kalinainen S, Ohtonen P, Ojala R, Savola O. First tarsometatarsal joint derotational arthrodesis—a new operative technique for flexible hallux valgus without touching the first metatarsophalangeal joint. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;53(1):22–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Perera AM, Mason L, Stephens MM. The pathogenesis of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(17):1650–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nix SE, Vicenzino BT, Collins NJ, Smith MD. Characteristics of foot structure and footwear associated with hallux valgus: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20(10):1059–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Okuda R, Kinoshita M, Yasuda T, Jotoku T, Kitano N, Shima H. The shape of the lateral edge of the first metatarsal head as a risk factor for recurrence of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(10):2163–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Robinson AH, Cullen NP, Chhaya NC, Sri-Ram K, Lynch A. Variation of the distal metatarsal articular angle with axial rotation and inclination of the first metatarsal. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(12):1036–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Coughlin MJ, Saltzman CL, Nunley JA. Angular measurements in the evaluation of hallux valgus deformities: a report of the ad hoc committee of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society on angular measurements. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23(1):68–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 1986;42(1):121–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Golightly YM, Hannan MT, Dufour AB, Renner JB, Jordan JM. Factors associated with hallux valgus in a community-based cross-sectional study of adults with and without osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2015;67(6):791–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanaka Y, Takakura Y, Kumai T, Sugimoto K, Taniguchi A, Hattori K. Proximal spherical metatarsal osteotomy for the foot with severe hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(10):1025–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamaguchi S, Sasho T, Kato H, Kuroyanagi Y, Banks SA. Ankle and subtalar kinematics during dorsiflexion-plantarflexion activities. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(4):361–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sturgeon JD, Cox JA, Mayo LL, Gunn GB, Zhang L, Balter PA, Dong L, Awan M, Kocak-Uzel E, Mohamed AS, Rosenthal DI, Fuller CD. Improved human observer performance in digital reconstructed radiograph verification in head and neck cancer radiotherapy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014 [Epub ahead of print].

  22. Pallotta S, Bucciolini M. A simple method to test the geometrical reliability of digital reconstructed radiograph (DRR). J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010;11(1):3128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sowman B, Radic R, Kuster M, Yates P, Breidiel B, Karamfilef S. Distal tibiofibular radiological overlap: does it always exist? Bone Joint Res. 2012;1(2):20–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tochigi Y, Suh JS, Amendola A, Pedersen DR, Saltzman CL. Ankle alignment on lateral radiographs. Part 1: sensitivity of measures to perturbations of ankle positioning. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(2):82–7.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Reilingh ML, Beimers L, Tuijthof GJ, Stufkens SA, Maas M, van Dijk CN. Measuring hindfoot alignment radiographically: the long axial view is more reliable than the hindfoot alignment view. Skeletal Radiol. 2010;39(11):1103–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Eustace S, O’Byrne J, Stack J, Stephens MM. Radiographic features that enable assessment of first metatarsal rotation: the role of pronation in hallux valgus. Skeletal Radiol. 1993;22(3):153–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan

    Satoshi Yamaguchi, Takahisa Sasho, Jun Endo, Yohei Yamamoto, Ryuichiro Akagi & Kazuhisa Takahashi

  2. Chiba University Hospital, Clinical Research Center, Chiba, Japan

    Yasunori Sato

Authors
  1. Satoshi Yamaguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takahisa Sasho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jun Endo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yohei Yamamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ryuichiro Akagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yasunori Sato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kazuhisa Takahashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Yamaguchi.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamaguchi, S., Sasho, T., Endo, J. et al. Shape of the lateral edge of the first metatarsal head changes depending on the rotation and inclination of the first metatarsal: a study using digitally reconstructed radiographs. J Orthop Sci 20, 868–874 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-015-0749-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-015-0749-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation