Skip to main content
Log in

Hypertonic dextrose versus corticosteroid local injection for the treatment of osteoarthritis in the first carpometacarpal joint: a double-blind randomized clinical trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the advantages of prolotherapy in the treatment of first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (OA) with those of corticosteroid local injection in the short and long term.

Methods

We performed a randomized controlled trial from March 2010 to March 2011 in an outpatient clinic at a university hospital. Sixty participants (60 hands) with OA of the first carpometacarpal joint were assigned equally to two groups. For the corticosteroid group, after 2 monthly saline placebo injections, a single dose of 40 mg methylprednisolone acetate (0.5 ml) mixed with 0.5 ml of 2 % lidocaine was injected. For the dextrose (DX) group, 0.5 ml of 20 % DX was mixed with 0.5 ml of 2 % lidocaine and the injection was repeated monthly for 3 months. Pain intensity, hand function and the strength of lateral pinch grip were measured at the baseline and at 1, 2, and 6 months after the treatment.

Results

Mean age (STD) was 63.6 (9.7) years, and mean (STD) visual analog scale (VAS) was 6 (2). The two groups were comparable at 2 months, but significantly different at 1 month, with better results for corticosteroid, and at 6 months with apparently more favorable outcome for DX [mean difference (95 % CI) in VAS = 1.1 (0.2, 2.0), p = 0.02]. After 6 months of treatment, both DX and corticosteroid injection increased functional level, but DX seemed to be more effective [mean difference (95 % CI) in total function score = 1.0 (0.2, 1.8), p = 0.01].

Discussion

For the long term, DX seems to be more advantageous, while the two treatments were comparable in the short term. Because of the satisfactory pain relief and restoring of function, we would prefer DX prolotherapy for the treatment of patients with OA.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic studies––investigating the results of treatment; level I.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Saase JLS, van Romunde LKR, Cats A, Vandenbroucke JP, Valkenburg HA. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: Zoetermeer survey. Comparison of radiological osteoarthritis in a Dutch population with that in 10 other populations. Ann Rheum Dis. 1989;48:271–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kloppenburg M. Hand osteoarthritis––an increasing need for treatment and rehabilitation. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2007;19:179–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang Y, Niu J, Kelly-Hayes M, Chaisson CE, Aliubadi P, Felson DT. Prevalence of symptomatic hand osteoarthritis and its impact on functional status among elderly. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:1021–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maheu E, Altman RD, Bloch DA, Doherty M, Hochberg M, Mannonia A, Punzi L, Specto T, Verbruggen G. Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis of the hand: recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2006;14:303–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cusi M, Saunders J, Hungerford B, Wisbey-Roth T, Lucas P, Wilson S. The use of prolotherapy in the sacro-iliac joint. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44:100–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Joshi R. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection for first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:1305–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Toker S, Kilinçoğlu V, Aksakalli E, Gülcan E, Ozkan K. Short-term results of treatment of tennis elbow with anti-inflammatory drugs alone or in combination with local injection of a corticosteroid and anesthetic mixture. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2008;42:184–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dagenais S, Haldeman S, Wooley JR. Intraligamentous injection of sclerosing solution (prolotherapy) for spinal pain: a critical review of the literature. Spine J. 2005;5:310–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dagenais S, Yelland MJ, DelMar C, Schoene ML. Prolotherapy injections for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;18:CD004059.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rabago D, Best TM, Beamsley M, Pattersn J. A systematic review of prolotherapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain. Clin J Sport Med. 2005;15:376–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jensen KT, Rabago DP, Best TM, Patterson JJ, Vanderby RJ. Early inflammatory response of knee ligaments to prolotherapy in a rat model. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:816–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt H. Effect of growth factors on proliferation of fibroblasts from the medical collateral and anterior cruciate ligaments. J Orthop Res. 1995;13:184–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwartz R. Prolotherapy: a literature review and retrospective study. J Neurol Orthop Med Surg. 1991;12:220–3.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reeves KD, Hassanein K. Randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled double-blind study of dextrose prolotherapy for osteoarthritic thumb and finger (DIP, PIP, and trapeziometacarpal) joints: evidence of clinical efficacy. J Altern Complement Med. 2000;6:311–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Reeves K, Hassanein K. Randomized prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study of dextrose prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis with or without ACL laxity. Altern Ther Health Med. 2000;6:68–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Reeves KD, Hassanein KM. Long-term effects of dextrose prolotherapy for anterior cruciate ligament laxity. Altern Ther Health Med. 2003;9:58–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dagenais S, Ogunseitan O, Haldeman S, Wooley JR, Newcomb RL. Side effects and adverse events related to intraligamentous injection of sclerosing solutions (prolotherapy) for back and neck pain: a survey of practitioners. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:909–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ongley MJ, Klein RG, Dorman TA, Eek BC, Hubert LJ. A new approach to the treatment of chronic low back pain. Lancet. 1987;2:143–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scarpone M, Rabago DP, Zgierska A, Arbogast G, Snell E. The efficacy of prolotherapy for lateral epicondylosis: a pilot study. Clin J Sport Med. 2008;18:248–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Watson JD, Shay BL. Treatment of chronic low-back pain: a 1-year or greater follow-up. J Altern Complement Med. 2010;16:951–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yelland MJ, Sweeting KR, Lyftogt JA, Ng SK, Scuffham PA, Evans KA. Prolotherapy injections and eccentric loading exercises for painful Achilles tendinosis: a randomised trial. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45:421–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Klein RG, Eek BC, DeLong WB, Mooney V. A randomized double-blind trial of dextrose-glycerine-phenol injections for chronic, low back pain. J Spinal Disord. 1993;6:23–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim WM, Lee HG, Jeong CW, Kim CM, Yoon MH. A randomized controlled trial of intra-articular prolotherapy versus steroid injection for sacroiliac joint pain. J Altern Complement Med. 2010;16:1285–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chou R, Atlas SJ, Stanos SP, Van zundert J, Vanelderen P, Kessels AG. Nonsurgical interventional therapies for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society clinical practice guideline. Spine. 2009;34:1078–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yelland MJ, Glasziou PP, Bogduk N, Kidd R. Prolotherapy injections, saline injections, and exercises for chronic low-back pain: a randomized trial. Spine. 2004;29:9–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dagenais S, Mayer J, Haldeman S, Borg-stein Y. Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with prolotherapy. Spine J. 2008;8:203–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Towheed TE. Systematic review of therapies for osteoarthritis of the hand. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2005;13:455–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kjeken I, Dagfinrud H, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Mowinckel P, Uhlig T, Kuien TK, Finset A. Activity limitations and participation restrictions in women and hand osteoarthritis: patients’ descriptions, and associations between dimensions of functioning. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:1633–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Bruce B, Fries JF. The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ): a review of its history, issues, progress, and documentation. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:167–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Godwin M, Dawes M. Intra-articular steroid injections for painful knee: systematic review with meta-analysis. Can Fam Physician. 2004;50:241–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azadeh Jahangiri.

Additional information

This trial has been registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) website http://www.irct.ir/, a WHO Primary Register set-up, with registration code: Irct ID: IRCT201011025088N1.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jahangiri, A., Moghaddam, F.R. & Najafi, S. Hypertonic dextrose versus corticosteroid local injection for the treatment of osteoarthritis in the first carpometacarpal joint: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sci 19, 737–743 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0587-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0587-2

Keywords

Navigation