Skip to main content
Log in

Conceptual design of an offshore LNG bunkering terminal: a case study of Busan Port

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study proposes the conceptual design of an offshore liquefied natural gas (LNG) bunkering terminal that would play a critical role in the LNG supply chain for LNG-fueled ship propulsion. The principal functions of the LNG bunkering terminal include importing LNG from LNG carriers, storing it temporarily, and exporting the stored LNG to LNG bunkering shuttles or LNG-fueled ships. One of the critical issues facing cargo operation from a safety point of view is the treatment of boil-off gas (BOG) generated from several sources in the storage systems of the bunkering terminal. Several methods of handling BOG seem feasible. The employment of a pressure vessel with a re-liquefaction system is considered the most effective and safe alternative. As a case study, a conceptual design of Busan Port is carried out by analyzing the statistics of visiting ships, estimating the required LNG consumption, determining the hull structure, and anticipating the design cases. The results obtained include the number of target LNG-fueled ships and LNG bunkering shuttles, LNG demand, capacity, and type of hull structure for the bunkering terminal. To estimate the process specifications and equipment features of the topside system, the BOG generated from several sources is calculated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BOG:

Boil-off gas

BPA:

Busan Port authority

CAPEX:

Capital expenditure

ECAs:

Emission control areas

EEDI:

Energy efficiency design index

GBS:

Gravity-based structure

GHG:

Greenhouse gas

GT:

Gross tonnage

HFO:

Heavy fuel oil

Hs:

Significant wave height

HT LNG:

High-temperature liquefied natural gas

IGC:

International code for the construction and equipment of ships carrying liquefied gases in bulk

IMO:

International maritime organization

LCC:

Life cycle cost

LNGC:

LNG carrier

LNG-BS:

LNG bunkering shuttle

LNG-BT:

LNG bunkering terminal

LNG-RS:

LNG receiving ship

LOA:

Length over all

LT LNG:

Low-temperature liquefied natural gas

MARPOL:

International convention for the prevention of pollution from ships

MEPC:

Marine environment protection committee

NG:

Natural gas

OCIMF:

Oil companies international marine forum

OPEX:

Operating expenditure

PM:

Particulate matters

SOLAS:

International convention for the safety of life at sea

STS:

Ship-to-ship

TEU:

Twenty-foot equivalent unit

VLCC:

Very large crude oil carrier

References

  1. IMO (2009) Regulations for the prevention of air pollution from ships. Revised MARPOL Annex VI

  2. Devanney J (2011) The impact of the energy design index on very large crude carrier design and CO2 emissions. Ships Offshore Struct 6:355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Det Norske Veritas AS, MAN Diesel and Turbo (2011) Quantum 9000 two stroke LNG

  4. Graham B (2012) Innovation in the LNG Value Chain. Increasing the Uptake of LNG as a Transportation Fuel

  5. Dongkyu C (2011) Shipyard’s perspective; ship design-LNG propulsion systems. CIMAC 2011, Oslo, Norway, 26 May 2011

  6. Excelerate energy (2007) LNG ship-to-ship transfer. LNG Transshipping conference, Houston, USA, 25 January, 2007

  7. Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd (2012) Concept design of LNG bunkering ship. The 6th Asian shipbuilding expert’s forum, Guangzhou, November 2012

  8. Manjin J, Joseph HC, Wungsang R (2003) LNG terminal design feedback from operator’s practical improvements. The 22nd World Gas Congress, Tokyo, Japan, 2003

  9. McGuire W (2000) Liquefied gas handling principles on ships and in terminals, 3rd edn. SIGTTO, England, pp 112–146

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wim van W, Hein O, Jos van der H (2004) Offshore LNG terminal: sunk or floating?. OTC 2004, Houston, USA, 3–6 May 2004

  11. Korea Hydrographic and Oceanographic Administration (2010–2012) Report of real-time Korea oceanographic observations and extreme highest and lowest tide level in Busan

  12. Korea Meteorological Administration (2002–2011) Annual climatological report

  13. International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (1960) Chapter 3: design criteria applicable to all ships

  14. International Code for the Construction and Equipment for Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk (2006) Chapter. 15: filling limits for cargo tanks

  15. Tor EB, Joachim B (2008) Ship-to-ship LNG transfer in arctic waters. OMAE 2008, Estoril, Portugal, 15–20 June 2008

  16. Busan Port Authority (2011) Ship statistics in Busan port

  17. Adriatic LNG (2010) Adriatic LNG Media Relations

  18. Madison Wiley Barron (1992) Ekofisk Tank Protective Barrier. Construction Innovation Forum

  19. Seyedalizadeh SRG, Babazadeh A, Arabshahi N (2010) Analysis of the continuous berth allocation problem in container ports using a genetic algorithm. J Mar Sci Technol 15:146–408

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by a grant from the LNG Plant R&D Center funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of the Korea government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daejun Chang.

About this article

Cite this article

Yun, S., Ryu, J., Seo, S. et al. Conceptual design of an offshore LNG bunkering terminal: a case study of Busan Port. J Mar Sci Technol 20, 226–237 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-014-0266-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-014-0266-1

Keywords

Navigation