Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bias analysis of proficiency testing programme results

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A proficiency testing programme might involve a great number of participating laboratories coming from different countries or regions, and normally they analysed the same test materials using their own routine analytical methods. Hence, the results of a proficiency testing programme may contain valuable information which could serve purposes other than just performance evaluation. This study attempted to extract information from the results of a proficiency testing programme for the purposes of educating the participating laboratories as suggested by ISO/IEC 17043. The “bias analysis” approach introduced in this study was based on the statistical model of measurement and the nature of bias in chemical analysis. With this approach, the participating laboratories could estimate the bias associated with different settings of experimental conditions according to the statistics of subset distribution of the reported results from the participating laboratories. This would be useful for them to review the analytical procedures they used and modify their methods if needed. The approach was applied to the analysis of data obtained from a number of past proficiency testing programmes, and the findings were discussed in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ISO/IEC 17043 (2010) Conformity assessments—general requirements for proficiency testing. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. ISO 5725-4 (1994) Basic methods for the determination of the trueness of a standard measurement method. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  3. ISO 13528 (2015) Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  4. ISO/IEC Guide 99 (2007) International vocabulary of metrology—basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  5. Magnusson B, Ellison SLR (2008) Treatment of uncorrected measurement bias in uncertainty estimation for chemical measurements. Anal Bioanal Chem 390:201–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Theodorsson E, Magnusson B, Leito I (2014) Bias in clinical chemistry. Bioanalysis 21:2855–2875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hibbert DB (2007) Systematic errors in analytical measurement results. J Chromatogr A 1158:25–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson R (2008) Assessment of bias with emphasis on method comparison. Clin Biochem Rev 29:S37–S42

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson M (2000) Recent trends in inter-laboratory precision at ppb and sub-ppb concentrations in relation to fitness for purpose criteria in proficiency testing. Analyst 125:385–386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Keeffe M (2000) Residue analysis in food: principles and applications, vol 33. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siu Kay Wong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wong, S.K., Yao, W.Y. Bias analysis of proficiency testing programme results. Accred Qual Assur 21, 185–189 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-016-1197-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-016-1197-9

Keywords

Navigation