Skip to main content
Log in

Proficiency tests on olive oil organized by the Italian National Reference Laboratory for pesticides: long-term performance of laboratories

  • Practitioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Italian National Reference Laboratory (NRL) for pesticides in Food of Animal Origin and Commodities with High Fat Content yearly organizes proficiency tests (PTs) on olive oil, addressed to: Mediterranean laboratories of International Olive Council, European laboratories (NRLs, official control laboratories and private laboratories), involved in the national and European monitoring programs. The main aim of these PTs was to compare the performances of the laboratories in Mediterranean and European countries in order to promote mutual acceptance of pesticide residue data regarding the analytical controls of olive oil. Since 2011, the protocol of the last three PTs has not been changed and also the list of participants has been steady, in the range of 40–44 laboratories. The test material consisted of commercial olive oil spiked with six different pesticides chosen in each exercise from a possible list of 25–26 compounds. In particular, the pesticide residues selected in our PTs are mainly those considered in the official control plans, with spiked mass fraction levels around their reference values set in the European Regulations. Pertinent and detailed information regarding multi-residue methods has been demanded to all participants, and an overall evaluation by means of a combined index of performance, such as the sum of the weighted z-scores, SWZ, and the sum of squared z-scores, SZ 2, has been performed. This type of exercise provides the possibility for the laboratories to control and improve the performance of their analytical methods employed during the official control on more parameters over the years. In this paper, a comparison of the overall performance of the laboratories was shown by using the SWZ or SZ 2 indexes, giving significance to the Italian participants as required by the NRL aim. During the three investigated COIPTs, 91 % of the laboratories obtained satisfactory results with SWZ or SZ 2 not exceeding 3. Focusing on the results of Italian laboratories, the performance improved during the selected PTs, respectively, from 70 % to 100 %. Moreover, the effect of the analytical methods on the dispersion of the results was evaluated in order to review the long-term performance of the participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Vidal JM, Frenich AG (2006) Pesticide. Humana Press, Totowa

    Google Scholar 

  2. European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EC) n. 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law. Animal health and animal welfare rules. In: Official Journal of the European Union L165/1

  3. European Commission. Commission implementing Regulation (EU) n 1274/2011 of 7 December 2011 concerning a coordinated multiannual control program of the Union for 2012. 2013 and 2014 to ensure compliance with maximum residue levels of pesticides and to assess the consumer exposure to pesticide residues in and on food of plant and animal origin. Official Journal of the European Union L325/24

  4. European Council. Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union L70/1

  5. European Council. Commission Regulation (EC) n. 149/2008 of 29 January 2008 amending regulation (EC) n. 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing Annexes II. III and IV setting maximum residue levels for products covered by Annex I thereto. Official Journal of the European Union L58/1

  6. Italian Ministerial Decree of 23 December 1992 transposing the Community Directive 90/642/EEC on the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues in and on ceratin products of plant origin. including fruit and vegetables. Official Journal of the European Communities n. L350/71

  7. ISO/IEC 17025:2005 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, ISO Geneva

  8. Directorate General for Health and Consumer Affairs (DG SANCO) (2013) Method validation and quality control procedures for pesticide residues analysis in food and feed. SANCO/12571/2013 Brussels. Belgium

  9. Mann I, Brookman B (eds) (2011) Eurachem guide: selection, use and interpretation of proficiency testing (PT) schemes, 2nd ed. www.eurachem.org

  10. EA-4/18 TA (2010) Guidance on the level and frequency of proficiency testing participation, European co-operation for Accreditation. www.european-accreditation.org

  11. Motohashi N, Nagashima H, Párkányi C, Subrahmanyam B, Zhang GW (1996) Official multiresidue methods of pesticide analysis in vegetables, fruits and soil. J Chromatogr A 22:333–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stefanelli P, Santilio A, Cataldi L, Dommarco R (2009) Multiresidue analysis of organochlorine and pyrethroid pesticides in ground beef meat by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Environ Sci Health, Part B 44:350–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rajski L, Lozano A, Belmonte-Valles N, Uclès A, Uclès S, Mezcua M, Fernandez-Alba AR (2013) Comparison of three multiresidue methods to analyse pesticides in green tea with liquid and gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Analyst 138(3):921–931

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cortez L, Duarte A, Hundewadt A, Schmidt A, Steffen B, Tholen D, Fostel H, Papadakis I, del Monte MG, Boley N, van Berkel PM (2003) How to interpret information from proficiency test exercises concerning the relative performance of accredited laboratories. Accred Qual Assur 8:511–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Antin L, Armishaw P (2010) Aspects of proficiency testing studies of traces elements in environmental samples with a focus on laboratory performance. Accred Qual Assur 15:467–471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Thompson M (2007) Proficiency testing: assessing z-scores in the longer term. Analytical Methods Committee. AMCTB 16

  17. Poulsen ME, Christensen HB, Hermann SS (2009) Proficiency test on incurred and spiked pesticide residues in cereals. Accred Qual Assur 14:477–485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Medina-Pastor P, Mezcua M, Rodriguez-Torreblanca C, Fernandez-Alba AR (2010) Laboratory assessment by combined z-score values in proficiency tests: experience gained through the European Union proficiency tests for pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables. Anal Bioanl Chem 397:3061–3070

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. European Commission (2014) EU Reference Laboratories for residues of pesticides. General Protocol for EU Proficiency Tests on Pesticide Residues in Food and Feed, 4th ed. www.eurl-pesticides.eu

  20. Medina-Pastor P, Rodriguez-Torreblanca C, Andersson A, Fernandez-Alba AR (2010) European Commission proficiency tests for pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables. Trends Anal Chem 29(1):70–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. ISO 13528:2005 Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. 1st ed, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  22. Anastassiades M, Lehotay SJ, Stajnbaher D, Schenck FJ (2003) Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction extraction/partitioning and “dispersive solid-phase extraction” for the determination of pesticide residue in produce. J AOAC Int 86(2):412–431

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gamón M, Lleó C, Ten A (2001) Multiresidue determination of pesticides in fruit and vegetables by gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. J AOAC Int 84(4):1209–1216

    Google Scholar 

  24. Payá P, Anastassiades M, Mack D, Sigalova I, Tasdelen B, Oliva J, Barba A (2007) Analysis of pesticide residues using the Quick Easy Cheap Effective Rugged and Safe (QuEChERS) pesticide multiresidue method in combination with gas and liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometric detection. Anal Bioanl Chem 389(6):1697–16714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Miyashita S, Inagaki K, Naito S, Shindoh K, Narukawa T, Zhu Y, Kuroiwa T, Hioki A, Fujimoto T, Chiba K (2013) Identification of possible technical problems in determination of the major inorganic constituents of brown-rice flour by evaluating proficiency test results. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:8357–8362

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiziana Generali.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Fig. 1 S

Analytical methods used for the three investigated PTs (DOCX 1209 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Generali, T., Stefanelli, P., Girolimetti, S. et al. Proficiency tests on olive oil organized by the Italian National Reference Laboratory for pesticides: long-term performance of laboratories. Accred Qual Assur 20, 247–253 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1130-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1130-7

Keywords

Navigation