Skip to main content
Log in

Relative sensitivity of combined standard uncertainty to changes induced in uncertainty components

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work provides a straightforward and rigorous solution to the problem of evaluating and expressing relative changes in combined uncertainty resulting from relative changes in the uncertainty components. The acquired information is essential to optimize the measurement method, indicating the most significant components to work with. This approach works for any discrete relative change in the uncertainties of the inputs, whether positive or negative, and was developed for the cases of independent and correlated quantities. Examples of both cases are treated. The results agree with that provided by direct calculation and are consistent with the ideas in EA 4/16. We propose the use of the expression “sensitivity of combined standard uncertainty to changes in uncertainty components” as a uniform quantitative reference to the individual importance of the components that form the combined uncertainty. We also discuss the reason to avoid the use of the expression “contribution of an uncertainty component to the combined uncertainty.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eurachem/Citac Guide CG 4 (2000) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement (QUAM). In: Ellison SLR et al (eds)

  2. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, IUPAC, IUPAP, ISO, OIML, Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (2012) JCGM 100:2008 Evaluation of measurement data—Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM 1995 with minor corrections), 3rd edn (Sèvres: JCGM). http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html

  3. European co-operation for Accreditation EA 4/02 (1999) Expression of uncertainty of measurement in calibration EA

  4. Kessel R, Kacker R, Berglund M (2006) Coefficient of contribution to the combined standard uncertainty. Metrologia 43:S189–S195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. European co-operation for Accreditation (2004) EA 4/16, 2004, EA Guidelines of the Expression of Uncertainty in Quantitative Testing

  6. Solaguren-Beascoa Fernández M (2011) On the use of the ‘uncertainty budget’ to detect dominant terms in the evaluation of measurement uncertainty. Accred Qual Assur 16:83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. International Organization for Standardization (2011) ISO/TS 14253-2:2011 Geometrical product specification—part 2: guide to the estimation of uncertainty in measurement in calibration of measuring equipment and in product verification

  8. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, IUPAC, IUPAP, ISO, OIML; Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (2012) International vocabulary of metrology—Basic and general concepts and associated terms, 3rd edn, vol 200. JCGM. http://www.bipm.org/vim

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Drs. Guilherme A. Garcia, Oleksii Kuznetsov, and Sílvio F. Santos, from Inmetro, for valuable comments and to Tatiana C. S. Baratto for the help with the English language.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. C. Baratto.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 70 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baratto, A.C., Bezerra, I.L. Relative sensitivity of combined standard uncertainty to changes induced in uncertainty components. Accred Qual Assur 18, 129–135 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-013-0954-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-013-0954-2

Keywords

Navigation