Abstract
Background
First introduced by Pimenta et al. in 2001, the extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF®) approach is a safe and effective alternative to anterior or posterior approaches to lumbar fusion, avoiding the large anterior vessels and posterior structures including the paraspinous muscles, facet joint complexes and tension bands.
Method
The authors provide a detailed description of the surgically relevant anatomy focusing on the close relationship among the lumbar plexus, psoas muscle and lateral spinal column. The surgical technique is detailed step by step, stressing how to avoid complications. A video clip of an XLIF is provided, and important perioperative considerations are listed in detail.
Conclusion
The XLIF® approach is a safe procedure allowing an approach to the lateral lumbar spine. Nevertheless, the surgeon’s knowledge of anatomical landmarks, response to visual and tactile cues, and intraoperative decision-making skills remain of paramount importance.
Key Points
• Correct lateral positioning with an orthogonal orientation of the corresponding lumbar vertebral body is of key importance.
• Subsequent table repositioning for every level is advised in multilevel cases.
• Posterior structures including the paraspinous muscles, facet joint complexes and tension bands are mostly preserved.
• Meticulous preoperative planning of the psoas docking point, considering all level-specific vascular and neuronal elements, is of paramount importance.
• In general, concavity is recommended for the selection of the approach side.
• A careful endplate and contralateral preparation and release are mandatory in order to allow bony fusion and maximum indirect foraminal decompression.
• Using a perioperative dexamethasone bolus seems to be effective at the L4/5 level to reduce postoperative plexopathy.
• Overdistraction should be avoided in order to prevent cage subsidence.
• A major disadvantage is the relatively high, but mostly only transient, incidence of psoas weakness as well as hip-groin-thigh pain, dysaesthesia and/or numbness.
• Major advantages include indirect neurological decompression, minimal blood loss, shorter operation times, decreased overall infection rates and more surface for bony fusion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berjano P, Lamartina C (2011) Minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach with advanced neurophysiologic monitoring for lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 20:1584–1586
Dakwar E, Vale FL, Uribe JS (2011) Trajectory of the main sensory and motor branches of the lumbar plexus outside the psoas muscle related to the lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach. J Neurosurg Spine 14:290–295
Guerin P, Obeid I, Bourghli A, Masquefa T, Luc S, Gille O, Pointillart V, Vital JM (2012) The lumbosacral plexus: anatomic considerations for minimally invasive retroperitoneal transpsoas approach. Surg Radiol Anat 34:151–157
Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Patterson J (2011) Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:26–32
Uribe JS, Arredondo N, Dakwar E, Vale FL (2010) Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: an anatomical study. J Neurosurg Spine 13:260–266
Acknowledgements
The authors of this work thank Dr. Francesco Langella for preparation of the surgical video clip.
Conflicts of interest
None for OG and FS. PB: Research grants from Nuvasive were received by his department. Honoraria for surgical education activities were received from Nuvasive, K2m, DepuySynthes and Zimmer. ET: Honorarium for surgical education activities was received from Medtronic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
(MP4 108982 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berjano, P., Gautschi, O.P., Schils, F. et al. Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF®): how I do it. Acta Neurochir 157, 547–551 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2248-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2248-9