Skip to main content
Log in

Spontaneous speech of patients with gliomas in eloquent areas before and early after surgery

  • Clinical Article - Brain Tumors
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Glioma patients often complain about problems in daily conversation. A detailed spontaneous speech analysis could provide more insight in these communicative problems; no previous studies are reported.

Objective

To select sensitive parameters in spontaneous speech pre- and post-operatively in patients with gliomas in eloquent areas.

Methods

We included 27 patients and 21 healthy controls. In addition to a naming and category fluency test, spontaneous speech was collected 1 month pre-operatively and 3 months post-operatively, and analysed with the variables: Self-corrections, Repetitions, Lexical Diversity, Incomplete Sentences and Mean Length of Utterance (MLUw). A correlation analysis was performed between the linguistic variables and tumour characteristics (grade, localisation and volume), treatment related factors, and between the linguistic variables and the language tasks.

Results

Pre-operatively, patients produced more Incomplete Sentences than the controls (p < 0.001). Post-operatively, patients’ utterance length (MLUw) (p < 0.05) was also deviant. The quality of the spontaneous speech was influenced by tumour grade and localisation. There was no influence of tumour volume or treatment-related factors. Pre- and post-operatively, patients’ performance on the naming and the fluency task deviated from normal (p < 0.001). The majority of the linguistic variables did not correlate with the language tasks, pointing to a measurement of distinct linguistic aspects.

Conclusion

Pre- and post-operatively there was a disorder in naming, category fluency and spontaneous speech, partly influenced by tumour characteristics. A spontaneous speech analysis appeared to be a valuable addition to standardised language tasks. Both measurements are important tools to obtain a complete linguistic profile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bastiaanse R, de Jong J (1996) Klinische linguistiek en grammaticale codering. Stem- Spraak-Taalpathologie 5:134–151

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bastiaanse R, Jonkers R (1998) Verb retrieval in action naming and spontaneous speech in agrammatic and anomic aphasia. Aphasiology 12(11):951–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bello L, Gallucci M, Fava M, Carrabba G, Giussani C, Acerbi F, Baratta P, Songa V, Conte V, Branca V, Stocchetti N, Papagno C, Gaini SM (2007) Intraoperative subcortical language tract mapping guides surgical removal of gliomas involving speech areas. Neurosurgery 60(1):67–80, discussion 80-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cherney LR (2008) Cortical stimulation and aphasia: the state of the science. Perspect Neurophysiol Neurogenic Speech Lang Disord 18(1):33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. De Benedictis A, Moritz-Gasser S, Duffau H (2010) Awake mapping optimizes the extent of resection for low-grade gliomas in eloquent areas. Neurosurgery 66(6):1074–1084, discussion 84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Duffau H, Gatignol P, Mandonnet E, Capelle L, Taillandier L (2008) Intraoperative subcortical stimulation mapping of language pathways in a consecutive series of 115 patients with Grade II glioma in the left dominant hepisphere. J Neurosurg 109:461–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grande M, Hussman K, Bay E, Christoph S, Piefke M, Willmes K, Huber W (2008) Basic parameters of spontaneous speech as a sensitive method for measuring change during the course of aphasia. Int J Commun Disord 43(4):408–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ilmberger J, Ruge M, Kreth FW, Briegel J, Reulen HJ, Tonn JC (2008) Intraoperative mapping of language functions: a longitudinal neurolinguistic analysis. J Neurosurg 109(4):583–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S (2001) Boston naming test. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klein M, Heimans JJ, Aaronson NK, van der Ploeg HM, Grit J, Muller M, Postma TJ, Mooij JJ, Boerman RH, Beute GN, Ossenkoppele GJ, van Imhoff GW, Dekker AW, Jolles J, Slotman BJ, Struikmans H, Taphoorn MJ (2002) Effect of radiotherapy and other treatment-related factors on mid-term to long-term cognitive sequelae in low-grade gliomas: a comparative study. Lancet 360(9343):1361–1368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Krainik A, Lehericy S, Duffau H, Capelle L, Chainay H, Cornu P, Cohen L, Boch AL, Mangin JF, Le Bihan D, Marsault C (2003) Postoperative speech disorder after medial frontal surgery. Role of the supplementary motor area. Neurology 60:587–594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kunii N, Kamada K, Ota T, Kawai K, Saito N (2011) A detailed analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in the frontal language area: a comparative study with extraoperative electrocortical stimulation. Neurosurgery 69(3):590–596, discussion 6–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Luteijn F, Barelds DPF (2004) Groninger intelligentie test II (GIT II). Pearson, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  14. MacWinney B (1991) The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mandonnet E, Nouet A, Gatignol P, Capelle L, Duffau H (2007) Does the left inferior longitudinal fasciculus play a role in language? A brain stimulation study. Brain 130:623–629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Murray LL, Holland AL, Beeson PM (1998) Spoken language of individuals with mild fluent aphasia under focused and divided-attention conditions. J Speech Lang Hear Res 41(1):213–227

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Naidich TP, Hof PR, Gannon PJ, Yousry TA, Yousry I (2001) Anatomic substrates of language: emphasizing speech. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 11(2):305–341, ix

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Prins R, Bastiaanse R (2004) Analysing the spontaneous speech of aphasic speakers. Aphasiology 18(12):1075–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Russell SM, Elliott R, Forshaw D, Kelly PJ, Golfinos JG (2005) Resection of parietal lobe gliomas: incidence and evolution of neurological deficits in 28 consecutive patients correlated to the location and morphological characteristics of the tumor. J Neurosurg 103(6):1010–1017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Santini B, Talacchi A, Squintani G, Casagrande F, Capasso R, Miceli G (2012) Cognitive outcome after awake surgery for tumors in language areas. J Neurooncol 108:319-326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Satoer D, Vork J, Visch-Brink E, Smits M, Dirven C, Vincent A (2012) Cognitive functioning early after surgery of gliomas in eloquent areas. J Neurosurg 117(5):831–838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schaffler L, Luders HO, Beck GJ (1996) Quantitative comparison of language deficits produced by extraoperative electrical stimulation of Broca’s, Wernicke’s, and basal temporal language areas. Epilepsia 37(5):463–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Scheibel RS, Meyers CA, Levin VA (1996) Cognitive dysfunction following surgery for intracerebral glioma: influence of histopathology, lesion location, and treatment. J Neurooncol 30(1):61–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Talacchi A, Santini B, Savazzi S, Gerosa M (2010) Cognitive effects of tumour and surgical treatment in glioma patients. J Neurooncol 103(3):541-549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Taphoorn MJ, Klein M (2004) Cognitive deficits in adult patients with brain tumours. Lancet Neurol 3(3):159–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van Kampen NJ, Wijnen FNK (2000) Grammaticale ontwikkeling. In: Gillis S, Schaerlakens AM (eds) Kindertaalverwerving. Een handboek voor het Nederlands. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen, pp 225–285

    Google Scholar 

  27. Verhage F (1964) Intelligentie en leeftijd: Onderzoek bij Nederlanders van 12 tot 77 jaar Van Gorkum Assen

  28. Wright HH, Silverman SW, Newhof M (2003) Measures of lexical diversity in aphasia. Aphasiology 17:443–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the European Low Grade Glioma Network (LGG) for elaborate discussions on this work at the 2012 Annual LGG Meeting in Toulouse, France.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Djaina Satoer.

Additional information

Presentation at conference

Portions of this work were presented as an oral presentation at the 2012 European Low Grade Glioma Network Meeting in Toulouse, France, and at the 13th International Science of Aphasia conference in Groningen, The Netherlands

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Satoer, D., Vincent, A., Smits, M. et al. Spontaneous speech of patients with gliomas in eloquent areas before and early after surgery. Acta Neurochir 155, 685–692 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1638-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1638-8

Keywords

Navigation