Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk factors and tumor response associated with hydrocephalus after gamma knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study was designed to investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors of hydrocephalus after gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for vestibular schwannoma.

Methods

The authors retrospectively reviewed clinical and neuroimaging findings of 221 patients who underwent GKRS for newly diagnosed vestibular schwannoma. Mean patient age was 54.1 years (range 7–83 years), mean tumor volume was 3,010.4 mm3 (range 34.7 to 14,300 mm3), mean marginal dose was 12.5 Gy (range 11 to 15 Gy), and mean follow-up duration was 31.9 months (range 1 to 107.6 months).

Results

Surgical intervention for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion after GKRS was necessary in 11 (5 %) of the patients. Median time between GKRS and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement was 15.5 months (range 1.8–37.8 months). These 11 patients showed female predominance (11 females) and mean tumor volume was significantly larger than in the other without hydrocephalus (6,509 vs. 2,726 mm3; p < 0.01). Decreases in tumor enhancement and swelling were observed in all 221 patients, and CSF protein was found to be elevated in five of nine patients with available data at the time of the shunt procedure. Hydrocephalic symptoms improved after VP shunt and tumor sizes further decreased at last follow-up in all patients.

Conclusions

Hydrocephalus after radiosurgery may co-occur with a temporary change of tumor volume after radiation treatment. Therefore, hydrocephalus should be kept in mind during the time of tumor volume transition. Furthermore, the authors suggest that frequent patient monitoring for hydrocephalus be maintained for up to 3–4 years after GKRS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atlas MD, Perez de Tagle JR, Cook JA, Sheehy JP, Fagan PA (1996) Evolution of the management of hydrocephalus associated with acoustic neuroma. Laryngoscope 106:204–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bloch J, Vernet O, Aube M, Villemure JG (2003) Non-obstructive hydrocephalus associated with intracranial schwannomas: hyperproteinorrhachia as an etiopathological factor? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 145:73–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brackmann DE, Kwartler JA (1990) A review of acoustic tumors: 1983–1988. Am J Otol 11:216–232

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Briggs RJ, Shelton C, Kwartler JA, Hitselberger W (1993) Management of hydrocephalus resulting from acoustic neuromas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 109:1020–1024

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Buxton N, Macarthur D, Robertson I, Punt J (2003) Neuroendoscopic third ventriculostomy for failed shunts. Surg Neurol 60:201–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cinalli G, Salazar C, Mallucci C, Yada JZ, Zerah M, Sainte-Rose C (1998) The role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of shunt malfunction. Neurosurgery 43:1323–1327

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gardner WJ, Spitler DK, Whitten C (1954) Increased intracranial pressure caused by increased protein content in the cerebrospinal fluid; an explanation of papilledema in certain cases of small intracranial and intraspinal tumors, and in the Guillain–Barre syndrome. N Engl J Med 250:932–936

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hailong F, Guangfu H, Haibin T, Hong P, Yong C, Weidong L, Dongdong Z (2008) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of communicating hydrocephalus: a preliminary study. J Neurosurg 109:923–930

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayhurst C, Dhir J, Dias PS (2005) Stereotactic radiosurgery and vestibular schwannoma: hydrocephalus associated with the development of a secondary arachnoid cyst: a report of two cases and review of the literature. Br J Neurosurg 19:178–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeon CJ, Kong DS, Nam DH, Lee JI, Park K, Kim JH (2010) Communicating hydrocephalus associated with surgery or radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma. J Clin Neurosci 17:862–864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lalwani AK (1992) Meningiomas, epidermoids, and other nonacoustic tumors of the cerebellopontine angle. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 25:707–728

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee SH, Kong DS, Seol HJ, Shin HJ (2011) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients with shunt malfunction. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 49:217–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Linskey ME, Lunsford LD, Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D (1992) Stereotactic radiosurgery for acoustic tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am 3:191–205

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mohammed TA, Ahuja MS, Ju SS, Thomas J (2010) Normal pressure hydrocephalus after gamma knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma. J Postgrad Med 56:213–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Noren G (1998) Long-term complications following gamma knife radiosurgery of vestibular schwannomas. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 70(Suppl 1):65–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pirouzmand F, Tator CH, Rutka J (2001) Management of hydrocephalus associated with vestibular schwannoma and other cerebellopontine angle tumors. Neurosurgery 48:1246–1253

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Roche PH, Ribeiro T, Soumare O, Robitail S, Pellet W, Regis J (2004) Hydrocephalus and vestibular schwannomas treated by gamma knife radiosurgery. Neurochirurgie 50:345–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rogg JM, Ahn SH, Tung GA, Reinert SE, Noren G (2005) Prevalence of hydrocephalus in 157 patients with vestibular schwannoma. Neuroradiology 47:344–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sawamura Y, Shirato H, Sakamoto T, Aoyama H, Suzuki K, Onimaru R, Isu T, Fukuda S, Miyasaka K (2003) Management of vestibular schwannoma by fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and associated cerebrospinal fluid malabsorption. J Neurosurg 99:685–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Steenerson RL, Payne N (1992) Hydrocephalus in the patient with acoustic neuroma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 107:35–39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Surash S, Chumas P, Bhargava D, Crimmins D, Straiton J, Tyagi A (2010) A retrospective analysis of revision endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Childs Nerv Syst 26:1693–1698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tekkok IH, Suzer T, Erbengi A (1992) Non-acoustic tumors of the cerebellopontine angle. Neurosurg Rev 15:117–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health & Welfare Affairs, Republic of Korea. (A092255)

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jung-Il Lee.

Additional information

Comment

For the first time, in this paper a vulnerable phase is identified for the development of hydrocephalus following gamma knife radiosurgery for acoustic neurinoma. Even though hydrocephalus following gamma knife radiosurgery for acoustic neurinoma is a rare complication, it is important to know the time period during which it may typically occur and follow patients for that potential complication accordingly.

Thomas Mindermann

Zurich, Switzerland

Seung Hoon Lee and Ho Jun Seol contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, S.H., Seol, H.J., Kong, D.S. et al. Risk factors and tumor response associated with hydrocephalus after gamma knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma. Acta Neurochir 154, 1679–1684 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1350-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1350-0

Keywords

Navigation