Skip to main content
Log in

Stress Analysis in Boreholes Drag Bh and Leknes Bh, Nordland, North Norway

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nordland in northern Norway is characterized by enhanced seismicity and uplift that makes it the most tectonically active area in Norway. This study is part of a project entitled Neotectonics in Norway—Implications for Petroleum Exploration, which aims at enhancing the understanding of regional-scale stress and strain dynamics in Nordland, and to impact risk and hazard assessment and petroleum exploration. This paper attempts to constrain the orientation of in situ horizontal stress using high-resolution acoustic televiewer logging data. The Geological Survey of Norway has drilled two 0.8 km deep near-vertical boreholes on opposite sides of the Vestfjord in Nordland, the open bight of sea that separates the Lofoten archipelago from the Norwegian mainland. Both boreholes are drilled just North of 68°N, with borehole Leknes Bh located near the geographic center of the Lofoten archipelago, and borehole Drag Bh located on approximate equal distance from the shore, on the Norwegian mainland. The results of this study are in most practical aspects inconclusive, mainly due to poor data quality. The data analysis has revealed erroneously high-borehole diameter, and several artifacts such as eccentric logging tool, rugose borehole wall, spiral hole, tool sticking and missing data. Four intervals with passive in situ stress indicators (borehole breakout and drilling-induced fractures) were found in travel time and amplitude images of the Drag Bh, suggesting approximately N–S orientation of maximum horizontal stress. However, these intervals are not found in cross-plots. Either result yields the lowest World Stress Map ranking quality (E).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ALT (2011) WellCAD software 4.4, Book 3 – Image & Structure. ALT WellCAD documentation. http://www.alt.lu/pdf/Image_Module.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2014

  • Ask D, Stephansson O, Cornet FH, Ask MVS (2009) Rock stress, rock stress measurements, and the Integrated Rock Stress determination Method (ISDM). RMRE 42:559–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell JS, Gough DI (1979) Northeast-southwest compressive stress in Alberta: evidence from oil boreholes. EPSL 45:475–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brudy M, Zoback MD (1993) Compressive and tensile failure of boreholes arbitrarily-inclined to principal stress axes: application to the KTB boreholes, Germany. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 30:1035–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brudy M, Zoback MD (1999) Drilling-induced tensile wall-fractures: implications for determination of in situ stress orientation and magnitude. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 136:191–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bungum H, Olesen O, Pascal C, Gibbons S, Lindholm C, Vestøl O (2010) To what extent is present seismicity of Norway driven by post-glacial rebound? J Geol Soc London, Spec Publ 167:373–384. doi:10.1144/0016-76492009-009

  • Fejerskov M, Lindholm C, Myrvang A, Bungum, H (2000) Crustal stress in and around Norway: a compilation of in situ stress observations. In Nøttvedt A (ed.) Dynamics of the Norwegian margin, Geol Soc London, Spec Publ 167: 441–449

  • Dehls JF, Olesen O, Bungum H, Hicks E, Lindholm CD, Riis F (2000) Neotectonic map, Norway and adjacent areas 1:3 mill. NGU, Trondheim. http://www.ngu.no/sokkelkart/Neotectonic_map.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2014

  • Dehls JF, Basilico M, Colesanti C (2002) Ground deformation monitoring in the Ranafjord area of Norway by means of the Permanent Scatterers technique. Geosci Remote Sensing Symp 2002. IGARSS ‘02. IEEE Int Toronto 1:203–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Deltombe JL, Schepers R, 2000. Combined Processing of BHTV Traveltime and Amplitude Images. In: Proc. Int. Symp. Borehole Geophysics for Minerals, Geotechnical, and Groundwater applications, Golden, CO, US. http://www.alt.lu/pdf/Deltombe_Schepers_MGLS2000.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2014

  • Deltombe J-L, Schepers R (2004) New development in real-time processing of full waveform acoustic televiewer data. J Appl Geophys 55:161–172. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2003.06.013

  • Elvebakk H, Rønning J (2011). Geofysisk logging av borehull ved Drag, Tysfjord og Leknes, Lofoten. NGU, Trondheim. http://www.ngu.no/upload/Publikasjoner/Rapporter/2011/2011_014.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2014

  • Haimson BC, Cornet FH (2003) ISRM Suggested Methods for rock stress estimation–Part 3: hydraulic fracturing (HF) and/or hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures (HTPF). Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.08.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidbach O, Tingay M, Barth A, Reinecker J, Kurfeß D, Müller B (2008) The world stress map database release 2008. doi:10.1594/GFZ.WSM.Rel2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson JA, Cornet FH, Christiansson R (2003) ISRM Suggested Methods for rock stress estimation—Part 1: Strategy for rock stress estimation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:991–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukkonen IT, Olesen O, Ask MVS, the PFDP Working Group (2010) Postglacial faults in Fennoscandia: targets for scientific drilling. Geol Fören Stockh Förh 132:71–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom E, Lund B, Tryggvason A, Uski M, Bödvarssin R, Juhlin C, Roberts R (2014). Microearthquakes illuminate the deep structure of the endglacial Pärvie fault, northern Sweden. Submitted to Geophys J Int

  • Lofts JC, Burke LT (1999) The recognition of artefacts from acoustic and resistivity borehole imaging devices. In: Lovell MA, Williamson G, Harvey PK (Eds.) Borehole imaging: applications and case histories. Geol. Soc., London, Special Publications, 159: 59–76

  • Mardia KV (1972) Statistics of directional data: probability and mathematical statistics. Academic Press, London, p 357

  • Olesen O, Blikra LH, Braathen A, Dehls JF, Olsen L, Rise L, Roberts D, Riis F, Faleide JI, Anda E (2004) Neotectonic deformation in Norway and its implications: a review. Norw J Geol 84:3–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Olesen O, Bungum H, Dehls J, Lindholm C, Pascal C., Roberts D (2013) Neotectonics, seismicity and contemporary stress field in Norway—mechanisms and implications. NGU. Trondheim. http://www.ngu.no/upload/Publikasjoner/Special%20publication/SP13_s145-173.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2014

  • Plumb RA, Hickman SH (1985) Stress-induced borehole elongation: A comparison between four-arm dipmeter and the borehole televiewer in the Auburn geothermal well. JGR 90:5513–5521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir G, Zoback MD (1982) Stress orientation profile to 3.5 km depth near the San Andreas fault at Cajun Pass, California. JGR 97:5059–5080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephansson O (1983) Rock stress measurements by sleeve fracturing. Proc. 5th Int. Soc. Rock Mech., Melbourne, F129–F137

  • Stephansson O, Särkkä P, Myrvang A (1986) State of stress in Fennoscandia. In: Stephansson O (Ed) Proc Int Symp Rock Stress Rock Stress Measurement, 1 –3 September 1986, Lulea, Sweden: 21–32

  • Tingay M, Reinecker J, Müller B (2008). Borehole breakout and drilling-induced fracture analysis from image logs. World Stress Map Guidelines: Image logs. http://dc-app3-14.gfz-potsdam.de/pub/guidelines/WSM_analysis_guideline_breakout_image.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2014

  • Zang A, Stephqansson O (2010) Stress field of the Earth’s crust. Springer, Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8444-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zoback MD, Barton CA, Brudy M, Castillo DA, Finkbeiner T, Grollimund BR, Moos DB, Peska P, Ward CD, Wiprut DJ (2003) Determination of stress orientation and magnitude in deep wells. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:1049–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is funded by Luleå University of Technology competence support to Maria Ask. The NEONOR2 project is funded by the Norwegian Research Council and co-sponsored by ten industry partners. We thank Thorkild Maak Rasmussen, Division of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering at Luleå University of Technology for assistance in obtaining magnetic inclination and declination data, and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria V. S. Ask.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ask, M.V.S., Ask, D., Elvebakk, H. et al. Stress Analysis in Boreholes Drag Bh and Leknes Bh, Nordland, North Norway. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48, 1475–1484 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0683-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0683-9

Keywords

Navigation