Abstract
Purposes
We have devised a modified seton technique that resects the external fistula tract while preserving the anal sphincter muscle. This study assessed the technique when used for the management of complex anal fistulas.
Methods
Between January 2006 and December 2007, 239 patients (208 males and 31 females, median age: 41 years) underwent surgery for complex anal fistulas using the technique. Of the 239 patients, 198 patients had trans-sphincteric fistula and 41 patients had supra-sphincteric fistula.
Results
The durations of the surgeries were 17 min (47, 13) [median (range, interquartile range)] for trans-sphincteric fistulas and 38 (44, 16) for supra-sphincteric fistulas. The durations of the surgeries were significantly (P < 0.05) longer for supra-sphincteric fistula than trans-sphincteric fistula. The hospital stays were 4 (13, 2) days and 5 (14, 3) days, respectively, for trans- and supra-sphincteric fistulas. The durations of seton placement until the spontaneous dropping of the seton were 42 (121, 48) and 141 (171, 55) days respectively. The recurrence rate was 0 % in patients with trans-sphincteric fistulas and 4.9 % (2 of 41) in patients with supra-sphincteric fistulas (P < 0.01). Serious incontinence was not observed.
Conclusions
The technique provided favorable results for the treatment of complex anal fistulas and could be safely applied while preserving the sphincter function and conserving fecal continence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buchanan GN, Owen HA, Torkington J, Lunniss PJ, Nicholls RJ, Dohen CRG. Long term outcomes of following loose-seton technique for external sphincter preservation in complex anal fistula. Br J Surg. 2004;91:476–80.
Eitan A, Koliada M, Bickel A. The use of the loose seton technique as a definitive treatment for recurrent and persistent high trans-sphincteric anal fistulas: a long-term outcome. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(6):1116–9.
Kennedy H, Zegarra J. Fistulotomy without external sphincter division of high anal fistulae. Br J Surg. 1990;77:898–901.
Abbas M, Lemus-Rangel R, Hamadami A. Long-term outcome of endorectal advancement flap complex anorectal fistulae. Am Surg. 2008;74:921–4.
Safar B, Jobanputra B, Sands D, Weiss E, Nogueras J, Wexer S: Anal fistula plug initial experience and outcome. Dis Colon Retum. 2009;52:248–52.
Hamel CT, Marti WR, Oertli D. Simplified placement and management of cutting seton in the treatment of trans-sphincteric anal fistula: technical note. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004;19:354–6.
Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong DW, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD. Cutting seton versus two-stage seton fistulotomy in the surgical management of high anal fistula. Br J Surg. 1998;85:243–5.
Kagawa R, Saito T, Miyaoka T, Minami R. Minimal seton: modified cutting seton for anal fistulas (in Japanese). Nihon Daityoukoumonbyou Gakkaizasshi (J Jpn Soc Coloproctology). 2002;55:59–61.
Williams JG, Farrands PA, Williams BA, Taylor BA, Lunniss PJ, Sagar PM, et al. The treatment of anal fistula: ACPGBI position statement. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(Suppl. 4):18–50.
Vial M, Parés D, Pera M, Grande L. Faecal incontinence after seton treatment for anal fistulae with and without surgical division of internal anal sphincter: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(3):172–8.
Conflict of interest
There are no actual or potential conflicts of interest to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tokunaga, Y., Sasaki, H. & Saito, T. Clinical role of a modified seton technique for the treatment of trans-sphincteric and supra-sphincteric anal fistulas. Surg Today 43, 245–248 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0211-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0211-z