Abstract
Aims
Insulin degludec is a new-generation ultra-long-acting basal insulin which offers a significantly more predictable glucose-lowering effect than other long-acting insulin analogues. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of treatment with insulin degludec and long-acting insulin analogues glargine and detemir in type 1 diabetic (T1D) patients by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods
The following electronic databases were searched up to January 2014: MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library. Additional references were obtained from the reviewed articles. There were included randomised controlled trials of at least 12-week duration with basal–bolus regimen therapies in T1D patients.
Results
Current analysis included four studies involving 1,846 T1D patients. The combined data from all trials showed a statistically significant reduction in the basal insulin dose (MD −0.042, 95 % CI −0.067 to −0.018, p = 0.001) and the total daily insulin dose (MD −0.072, 95 % CI 0.016 to −0.027, p = 0.002) in the degludec group compared to other long-acting analogues. There was also a significant reduction of nocturnal hypoglycaemia in the degludec group compared to the controls (rate ratio 0.697, 95 % CI 0.617–0.786, p = 0.000). There were no differences between the groups in terms of glycated haemoglobin values, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and adverse events.
Conclusions
Basal–bolus treatment with insulin degludec was superior to long-acting insulin analogues detemir and glargine in reducing the rate of nocturnal hypoglycaemia. In comparison with other long-acting analogues, treatment with insulin degludec was safe and patients obtained similar metabolic control expressed by HbA1c and FPG levels with the added benefit of a reduced basal and total insulin dose.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- T1D:
-
Type 1 diabetes mellitus
- IDF:
-
International Diabetes Federation
- ISPAD:
-
International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes
- RCT:
-
Randomised control trial
- T2D:
-
Type 2 diabetes
- DM:
-
Diabetes mellitus
- FPG:
-
Fasting plasma glucose
- HbA1c:
-
Glycated haemoglobin
- PRISMA:
-
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- MD:
-
Mean difference
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- AEs:
-
Adverse effects
- SAEs:
-
Serious adverse effects
- ITT:
-
Intention-to-treat
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
- IDeg:
-
Insulin degludec
- IGlar:
-
Insulin glargine
- IDet:
-
Insulin detemir
- IDegAsp:
-
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart
References
International Diabetes Federation. http://www.idf.org/sites/default/files/Diabetes-in-Childhood-and-Adolescence-Guidelines.pdf201
Rodbard HW, Gough S, Lane W, Korsholm L, Bretler DM, Handelsman (2014) Reduced risk of hypoglycemia with insulin degludec versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes requiring high doses of Basal insulin: a meta-analysis of 5 randomized begin trials. Endocr Pract 20(4):285–292
Monami M, Mannucci E (2013) Efficacy and safety of degludec insulin: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Curr Med Res Opin 29(4):339–342
Brod M, Christensen T, Thomsen TL, Bushnell DM (2011) The impact of non-severe hypoglycemia events on work productivity and diabetes management. Value Health 14(5):665–671
Cryer PE (2002) The pathophysiology of hypoglycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Nutr Metab 15(5):330–333 discussion 362
Jones TW, Davis EA (2003) Hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes: current issues and controversies. Pediatr Diabetes 4(3):143–150
Currie CJ, Morgan CL, Poole CD, Sharplin P, Lammert M, McEwan P (2006) Multivariate models of health-related utility and the fear of hypoglycaemia in people with diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin 22(8):1523–1534
Heise T, Hermanski L, Nosek L, Feldman A, Rasmussen S, Haahr H (2012) Insulin degludec: four times lower pharmacodynamic variability than insulin glargine under steady-state conditions in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 14(9):859–864
Jonassen I, Havelund S, Hoeg-Jensen T, Steensgaard DB, Wahlund PO, Ribel U (2012) Design of the novel protraction mechanism of insulin degludec, an ultra-long-acting basal insulin. Pharm Res 29(8):2104–2114
Sorli C, Warren M, Oyer D, Mersebach H, Johansen T, Gough SC (2013) Elderly patients with diabetes experience a lower rate of nocturnal hypoglycaemia with insulin degludec than with insulin glargine: a meta-analysis of phase IIIa trials. Drugs Aging 30(12):1009–1018
Higgins JPT, Green S (2008) Cochrane collaboration. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley, Chichester, England; Hoboken, NJ
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700
Birkeland KI, Home PD, Wendisch U et al (2011) Insulin degludec in type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial of a new-generation ultra-long-acting insulin compared with insulin glargine. Diabetes Care 34(3):661–665
Mathieu C, Hollander P, Miranda-Palma B, Cooper J, Franek E, Russell-Jones D, Larsen J, Tamer SC, Bain SC (2013) Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec in a flexible dosing regimen vs insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes (BEGIN: Flex T1): a 26-week randomized, treat-to-target trial with a 26-week extension. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98(3):1154–1162
Hirsch IB, Bode B, Courreges JP, Dykiel P, Franek E, Hermansen K, King A, Mersebach H, Davies M (2012) Insulin degludec/insulin aspart administered once daily at any meal, with insulin aspart at other meals versus a standard basal-bolus regimen in patients with type 1 diabetes: a 26-week, phase 3, randomized, open-label, treat-to-target trial. Diabetes Care 35(11):2174–2181
Heller S, Buse J, Fisher M et al (2012) Insulin degludec, an ultra-long-acting basal insulin, versus insulin glargine in basal-bolus treatment with mealtime insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes (BEGIN Basal-Bolus Type 1): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, treat-to-target non-inferiority trial. Lancet 379(9825):1489–1497
Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL (2007) Insulin resistance, the metabolic syndrome, and complication risk in type 1 diabetes: “double diabetes” in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care 30(3):707–712
Conway B, Costacou T, Orchard T (2009) Is glycaemia or insulin dose the stronger risk factor for coronary artery disease in type 1 diabetes? Diabetes Vasc Dis Res 6(4):223–230
Marshall SL, Edidin D, Sharma V, Ogle G, Arena VC, Orchard T (2013) Current clinical status, glucose control, and complication rates of children and youth with type 1 diabetes in Rwanda. Pediatr Diabetes 14(3):217–226
Wang MY, Yu X, Lee Y, McCorkle SK, Clark GO, Strowig S, Unger RH, Raskin P (2013) Iatrogenic hyperinsulinemia in type 1 diabetes: its effect on atherogenic risk markers. J Diabetes Complicat 27(1):70–74
Bain SC, Gill GV, Dyer PH, Jones AF, Murphy M, Jones KE, Smyth C, Barnett AH (2003) Characteristics of type 1 diabetes of over 50 years duration (the golden years cohort). Diabet Med 20(10):808–811
Acknowledgments
Sanofi Aventis and NovoNordisk sponsored lectures as well as participation in medical conferences of AS and KD.
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.
Statement of human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Managed by Massimo Porta.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dżygało, K., Golicki, D., Kowalska, A. et al. The beneficial effect of insulin degludec on nocturnal hypoglycaemia and insulin dose in type 1 diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Acta Diabetol 52, 231–238 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-014-0604-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-014-0604-0