Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Retrograde dynamic locked intramedullary nailing for aseptic supracondylar femoral nonunion after dynamic condylar screw treatment

  • Original Article • KNEE - FRACTURES
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Supracondylar femoral nonunions after dynamic condylar screw (DCS) treatment are uncommon, and few studies have addressed an optimal treatment technique for this disorder. Re-insertion of a new plate may not be secure because of bony defects in the distal fragment, created by the lag screw of the DCS.

Materials and methods

Forty-two consecutive adult patients with 42 supracondylar femoral nonunions were treated with removal of the DCS, re-alignment of the knee axis, and insertion of a retrograde dynamic traditional femoral locked nail. When necessary, a humeral plate was augmented to reinforce rotational stability.

Results

A final group of 36 patients with 36 nonunions were followed for an average of 2.8 years (range 1.1–6.2 years). All nonunions healed with a union rate of 100 %, and the average time to union was 4.2 months (range 2.5–5.5 months). Complications included two malunions. There were no instances of nonunion or deep infection. Satisfactory knee function among 36 patients improved from 8.2 % preoperatively to 86.1 % at the last follow-up (p < 0.001). All 36 patients could walk without aids.

Conclusion

The described technique may be an excellent alternative treatment for an aseptic supracondylar femoral nonunion after DCS treatment. The technique is not difficult, and the union rate and satisfactory rate are high.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Merchan ECR, Maestu PR, Blanco RP (1992) Blade-plating of closed displaced supracondylar fractures of the distal femur with the AO system. J Trauma 32:174–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wahnert D, Hoffmeier K, Frober R, Hofmann GO, Muckley T (2011) Distal femur fractures of the elderly—different treatment options in a biomechanical comparison. Injury 42:655–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu CC, Shih CH (1992) Treatment of femoral supracondylar unstable comminuted fractures: comparison between plating and Grosse-Kempf interlocking nailing techniques. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 111:232–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang JW, Weng LH (2003) Treatment of distal femoral nonunion with internal fixation, cortical allograft struts, and autogenous bone-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 85:436–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moore TJ, Watson T, Green SA, Garland DE, Chandler RW (1987) Complications of surgically treated supracondylar fractures of the femur. J Trauma 27:402–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stover M (2001) Distal femoral fractures: current treatment, results and problems. Injury 32(Suppl 3):SC3–SC13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Watanabe Y, Takai S, Yamashita F, Kusakabe T, Kim W, Hirasawa Y (2002) Second-generation intramedullary supracondylar nail for distal femoral fractures. Int Orthop 26:85–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Shan S, Desai P, Mounasamy V (2015) Retrograde nailing of femoral fractures: a retrospective study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25:1093–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Granata JD, Litsky AS, Lustenberger DP, Probe RA, Ellis TJ (2012) Immediate weight bearing of comminuted supracondylar femur fractures using locked plate fixation. Orthopedics 35:e1210–e1213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Assari S, Kaufmann A, Darvish K, Park J, Haw J, Safadi F, Rehman S (2013) Biomechanical comparison of locked plating and spiral blade retrograde nailing of supracondylar femur fractures. Injury 44:1340–1345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Henderson CE, Lujan TJ, Kuhl LL, Bottlang M, Fitzpatrick DC, Marsh JL (2011) Healing complications are common after locked plating for distal femur fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1757–1765

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Collinge CA, Gardner MJ, Crist BD (2011) Pitfalls in the application of distal femur plates for fractures. J Orthop Trauma 25:695–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Petsatodis G, Chatzisymeon A, Antonarakos P, Givissis P, Papadopoulos P, Christodoulou A (2010) Condylar buttress plate versus fixed angle condylar blade plate versus dynamic condylar screw for supracondylar intra-articular distal femoral fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 18:35–38

    Google Scholar 

  14. Henderson CE, Kuhl LL, Fitzpatrick DC, Marsh JL (2011) Locking plates for distal femur fractures: Is there a problem with fracture healing? J Orthop Trauma 25(Suppl 1):S8–S14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shewring DJ, Meggitt BF (1992) Fractures of the distal femur treated with the AO dynamic condylar screw. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 74:122–125

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Miclau T, Tscherne H (1997) Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) using the DCS in proximal and distal femoral fractures. Injury 28(Suppl 1):A20–A30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Christodoulou A, Terzidis I, Ploumis A, Metsovitis S, Koukoulidis A, Toptsis C (2005) Supracondylar femoral fractures in elderly patients treated with the dynamic condylar screw and the retrograde intramedullary nail: a comparative study of the two methods. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125:73–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chapman MW, Finkemeier CG (1999) Treatment of supracondylar nonunions of the femur with plate fixation and bone graft. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 81:1217–1228

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu CC (2009) Retrograde dynamic locked nailing for femoral supracondylar nonunions after plating. J Trauma 66:195–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu CC (2011) Retrograde dynamic locked nailing for aseptic nonunion of femoral supracondyle after antegrade locked nailing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:513–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gustilo RB, Anderson JTT (1976) Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones with retrospective and prospective analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 58:453–458

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kempf I, Grosse A, Beck G (1985) Closed locked intramedullary nailing: its application to comminuted fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 67:709–720

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pihlajamaki HK, Salminen ST, Bostman OM (2002) The treatment of nonunion following intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 16:394–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Seinsheimer F (1978) Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 60:300–306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mize RD, Bucholz RW, Grogan DP (1982) Surgical treatment of displaced, comminuted fractures of the distal end of the femur: an extensile approach. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 64:871–879

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Heiney JP, Battula S, O’Connor JA, Ebraheim N, Schoenfeld AJ, Vrabec G (2012) Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of retrograde nail, retrograde intramedullary nail, and prototype locking retrograde nail. Clin Biomech 27:692–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Paller DJ, Frenzen SW, Bartlett CS 3rd, Beardsley CL, Beynnon BD (2013) A three-dimensional comparison of intramedullary nail constructs for osteopenic supracondylar femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 27:93–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stevenson S (1998) Enhancement of fracture healing with autogenous and allogeneic bone grafts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355S:S239–S246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Koval KJ, Seligson D, Rosen H, Fee K (1995) Distal femoral nonunion: treatment with a retrograde inserted locked intramedullary nail. J Orthop Trauma 9:385–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hailer YD, Hoffmann R (2006) Management of a nonunion of the distal femur in osteoporotic bone with the internal fixation system LISS (less invasive stabilization system). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126:350–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Khan AM, Ryan MG, Meinhard BP, Miller T (1999) Use of a custom retrograde intramedullary rod for the management of distal femoral nonunion: a report of two cases. Am J Orthop 28:361–364

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Karlstrom G, Olerud S (1974) Fractures of the tibial shaft: a critical evaluation of treatment alternatives. Clin Orthop Relat Res 105:82–111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Henry SL, Trager S, Green S, Seligson D (1991) Management of supracondylar fractures of the femur with the GSH intramedullary nail: preliminary report. Contemp Orthop 22:631–640

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zlowodzki M, Williamson S, Cole PA, Zardiackas LD, Kregor PJ (2004) Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system, angled blade plate, and retrograde intramedullary nail for the internal fixation of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 18:494–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Leibner ED, Mosheiff R, Safran O, Abu-Snieneh K, Liebergall M (1999) Femoral fracture at the proximal end of an intramedullary supracondylar nail: a case report. Am J Orthop 28:53–55

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ricci WM (2005) Femur: trauma. In: Vaccaro AR (ed) Orthopedic knowledge update: 8. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL, pp 425–431

    Google Scholar 

  37. Barry M, Paterson JMH (2004) Flexible intramedullary nails for fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 86:947–953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Vallamshetla VRP, Dc Silva U, Bache CE, Gibbons PJ (2006) Flexible intramedullary nails for unstable fixation of the tibia in children: an eight-year experience. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 88:536–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi-Chuan Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, CC. Retrograde dynamic locked intramedullary nailing for aseptic supracondylar femoral nonunion after dynamic condylar screw treatment. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26, 625–631 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1800-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1800-0

Keywords

Navigation