Abstract
The posterolateral approach to ankle joint is well suited for ORIF of posterior malleolar fractures. There are no major neurovascular structures endangering this approach other than the sural nerve. The sural nerve is often used as an autologous peripheral nerve graft and provides sensation to the lateral aspect of the foot. The aim of this paper is to measure the precise distance of the sural nerve from surrounding soft tissue structures so as to enable safe placement of skin incision in posterolateral approach. This is a retrospective image review study involving 64 MRI scans. All measurements were made from Axial T1 slices. The key findings of the paper is the safety window for the sural nerve from the lateral border of tendoachilles (TA) is 7 mm, 1.3 cm and 2 cm at 3 cm above ankle joint, at the ankle joint and at the distal tip of fibula respectively. Our study demonstrates the close relationship of the nerve in relation to TA and fibula in terms of exact measurements. The safety margins established in this study should enable the surgeon in preventing endangerment of the sural nerve encountered in this approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hoppenfeld S, de Boer P (2003) Surgical exposures in orthopaedics, 3rd edn. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, Baltimore, MD, p 627
Wissing JC, Van Laarhoven CJ, Van der Werken C (1992) The posterior antiglide plate for fixation of fractures of lateral malleolus. Injury 23(2):94–96
Carmont MR, Davies MB (2008) Buttress plate stabilisation of posterior malleolar ankle fractures: a familiar technique through an unfamiliar approach. Curr Orthop 22:359–364
Standrig S (2008) Gray’s anatomy, chapter 83, 40th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier, London, Amsterdam, p 1427
Solomon LB et al (2001) Surgical anatomy of the sural and superficial fibular nerves with an emphasis on the approach to the lateral malleolus. J Anat 199:717–723
Aktan Ikiz ZA, Uçerler H, Bilge O (2005) The anatomic features of the sural nerve with an emphasis on its clinical importance. Foot Ankle Int 26(7):560–567
Webb J, Moorjani N, Radford M (2000) Anatomy of the sural nerve and its relation to the tendoachilles. Foot Ankle Int 21(6):475–477
Hoppenfeld S, de Boer P (2003) Surgical exposures in orthopaedics, 3rd edn. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, Baltimore, MD, p 335
Keser S et al (2006) Anatomic localisation of the popliteal artery at the level of the knee joint: MRI study. Arthroscopy 22:656–659
McCann PA et al (2010) The volar anatomy of the distal radius—an MRI study of the FCR approach. Injury 41:1012–1016
Stoller DW (2005) MRI imaging in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine; Chapter 8, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Raven, Philadelphia, PA, New York, p 470
Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J, Wilson G (1998) Adult ankle fractures—an increasing problem? Acta Orthop Scand 69(1):43–47
Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown CM (2006) Rockwood & Green. Fractures in adults, vol 2, 6th edn. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, Baltimore, MD, p 2188
McDaniel WJ, Wilson FC (1977) Trimalleolar fractures of the ankle. An end result study. Clin Orthop 122:37–45
Jaskulka RA, Ittner G, Schedl R (1989) Fractures of the posterior tibial margin: their role in the prognosis of malleolar fractures. J Trauma 29(11):1565–1570
Ferkel RD, Guhl JF, Heath DD (1996) Neurological complications of ankle arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 12:200–208
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ellapparadja, P., Husami, Y. & McLeod, I. Safety profile of sural nerve in posterolateral approach to the ankle joint: MRI study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24, 615–619 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1343-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1343-6