Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Spino-pelvic-rhythm with forward trunk bending in normal subjects without low back pain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A strong correlation between low back pain and tight hamstrings has been reported. However, the effect of tight hamstrings on spinal biomechanics remains unclear. The purpose of the study was to investigate spino-pelvic-rhythm during forward bending of the trunk and to clarify the rhythm features with regard to hamstrings tightness. Eighteen healthy male adults with no history of low back pain volunteered to participate. First, we measured the finger-to-floor distance (FFD) in the upright position and set this parameter to 100 %. Using a spinal mouse, spinal alignment was measured in the following four positions: (1) upright posture—100 % FFD; (2) forward bending—50 % FFD; (3) forward bending—25 % FFD; and (4) forward bending—0 % FFD (fingers in contact with the floor). Changes of the angle of the thoracic and lumbar spine as well as the pelvis were calculated. As an indicator of tight hamstrings, we measured straight leg raising (SLR) angle. From positions 1–2 (phase I), the entire spino-pelvic angle moved in 104°. During this phase, the lumbar spine mainly moved. In the second phase (positions 2–3), it moved in 16°. Interestingly, all but 2 subjects showed a negative angle in the thoracic motion, meaning that the thoracic spine extended 4° during trunk flexion, thus exhibiting paradoxical motion. During this phase, lumbopelvic rhythm showed 2 patterns. In 7 subjects, pelvic motion was greater than lumbar motion, while the remaining subjects showed the opposite. In subjects without tight hamstrings, 83 % showed a pelvis-dominant pattern. Only 7 subjects were capable of position 4. During this phase, only slight motion was noted in the spine, and the majority of the motion occurred in the pelvis. Lumbar and pelvic motion correlated negatively in all phases. SLR angle and pelvic motion correlated strongly during phase III, indicating dominant pelvic movement in flexible subjects. The lumbo-pelvic-rhythm comprises 2 patterns—lumbar dominant and pelvis dominant. In flexible subjects, pelvis movement was dominant. In conclusion, improving tight hamstrings may reduce lumbar loading thereby reducing low back pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mayer TG, Tencer AF, Kristofersen S et al (1984) Use of noninvasive for quantification of spinal range of motion in normal subjects and chronic low back dysfunction patient. Spine 9:585–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burton AK, Tillotson KM, Troup JD (1989) Variation in lumbar sagittal mobility with low-back trouble. Spine 14(6):584–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kujala UM, Taimela S, Oksanen A et al (1997) Lumbar mobility and low back pain during adolescence. A longitudinal three-year follow-up study in athletes and controls. Am J Sports Med 25(3):363–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas E, Silman AJ, Papageorgiou AC, Macfarlane GJ et al (1998) Association between measures of spinal mobility and low back pain. An analysis of new attenders in primary care. Spine 23(3):343–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamaoui A, Do MC, Bouisset S (2004) Postural sway increase in low back pain subjects is not related to reduced spine range of motion. Neurosci Lett 357(2):135–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Esola MA, McClure PW, Fitzgerald GK et al (1996) Analysis of lumbar spine and hip motion during forward bending in subjects with and without a history of low back pain. Spine 21:71–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McClure PW, Esola M, Schreier R et al (1997) Kinematic analysis of lumbar and hip motion while rising from a forward, flexed position in patients with and without a history of low back pain. Spine 22:552–558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Porter JL, Wilkinson A (1997) Lumbar-hip flexion motion. A comparative study between asymptomatic and chronic low back pain in 18- to 36-year-old men. Spine 22:1508–1513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kottke FJ, Pauley DL, Ptak RA (1966) The rationale for prolonged stretching for correction of shortening of connective tissue. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 47:345–352

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mierau D, Cassidy JD, Yong-Hing K (1989) Low-back pain and straight leg raising in children and adolescents. Spine 14:526–528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heino JG, Godges JJ, Carter CL (1990) Relationship between Hip Extension Range of Motion and Postural Alignment. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 12:243–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li Y, McClure PW, Pratt N (1996) The effect of hamstring muscle stretching on standing posture and on lumbar and hip motions during forward bending. Phys Ther 76(8):836–849

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mannion AF, Knecht K, Balaban G et al (2004) A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewed from the literature. Eur Spine J 13(2):122–136

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Post RB, Leferink VJM (2004) Spinal mobility: sagittal range of motion measured with the SpinalMouse, a new non-invasive device. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:187–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Houki N (2010) Posture analysis of Japanese health adults and patients with low back pain and back pain using the spinal mouse (in Japanese). J Kyorin Med Soc 41:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kutsuna T, Watanabe H (1984) Studies on the straight leg raising angle in Japanese adults (in Japanese). Jap Associ Rehab Med 21:215–219

    Google Scholar 

  17. Edmondston SJ, Ferguson A, Ippersiel P et al (2012) Clinical and radiological investigation of thoracic spine extension motion during bilateral arm elevation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 42(10):861–869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sugawara H (2007) Feature of range of motion of spine and hip joint in non-specific low back pain (in Japanese). Professionalism in physiotherapy 1:23–30

  19. White SG, Sahrmann SA (1994) A movement system balance approach to management of musculoskeletal pain. In: Grant R (ed) Physical therapy of the cervical and thoracic spine New York. Churchill Livingstone Inc, NY, pp 339–357

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meroni R, Cerri CG, Lanzarini C et al (2010) Comparison of active stretching technique and static stretching technique on hamstring flexibility. Clin J Sport Med 20:8–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sairyo K, Kawamura T, Mase Y et al (2012) Jack-knife Stretching promotes flexibility of tight hamstrings after 4 weeks: A pilot study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, E-pub

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rehabilitation, Teikyo University Mizonokuchi Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan

    Kiyotaka Hasebe & Yasushi Hada

  2. Faculty of Sports Science, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Japan

    Kiyotaka Hasebe, Koji Kaneoka & Yoshio Nakamura

  3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Teikyo University Mizonokuchi Hospital, 3-8-3 Mizonokuchi, Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki, 213-8507, Japan

    Koichi Sairyo & Akira Dezawa

  4. Faculty of Health and Medicalcare, Saitama Medical University, Iruma, Japan

    Yu Okubo

Authors
  1. Kiyotaka Hasebe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Koichi Sairyo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yasushi Hada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Akira Dezawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yu Okubo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Koji Kaneoka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yoshio Nakamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koichi Sairyo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hasebe, K., Sairyo, K., Hada, Y. et al. Spino-pelvic-rhythm with forward trunk bending in normal subjects without low back pain. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24 (Suppl 1), 193–199 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1303-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1303-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation