Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Do we know the outcome predictors for cauda equine syndrome (CES)? A retrospective, single-center analysis of 60 patients with CES with a suggestion for a new score to measure severity of symptoms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Despite the awareness and familiarity of almost every medical professional with the cauda equine compression syndrome (CES), risk factors for a poor prognosis of the disease remain elusive. Even the relationship between subsequent outcome and the time elapsed from the time of appearance of symptoms to surgery taking place remain obscure. The aim of our study, therefore, was to analyze a relatively large population of our own patients studied consecutively, to identify outcome predictors for CES and to propose a clinical score for CES symptoms (Berlin CES score).

Methods

We screened the hospital’s electronic database retrospectively for patients admitted with CES between 2001 and 2010. Since our hospital is a superregional trauma center with standardized emergency room procedures, all patients included in the study underwent the same routine. Using baseline data, we analyzed the following parameters: duration of symptoms, period of time between diagnosis and imaging, respectively, surgery; pre- and postoperative pain, motor deficits, reflex changes, urinary and bowl dysfunctions, reduced anal wink, saddle anesthesia, genital or perianal sensations and residual urine. The semi-quantitative assessment of the neurological outcome was performed by application of the Berlin CES score.

Results

Surprisingly, we were not able to identify any single parameters that could reliably predict the outcome of the disease. We were able to show statistically significant correlations between a high preoperatively Berlin CES score (i.e., a weighted summation of bladder dysfunction, rectal dysfunction, genital sensation, perianal sensation, rectal tone and saddle anesthesia) and a poor outcome regarding the postoperative existence of perianal (p < 0.001) and genital (p = 0.001) hypoesthesia, as well as reduced rectal tone (p = 0.0047). There was no significant interference of bladder or bowel function. Further analysis, in which we considered the time between diagnosis and surgery, revealed that both patients operated within 24 h and after 48 h could benefit from the intervention. Consequently, we were not able to show a correlation between speed of surgical treatment and outcome.

Conclusion

Although we analyzed a relatively large cohort, we were not able to identify single parameters that were capable of reliably predicting the outcome of patients with CES. Nonetheless, we were able to show that consideration of multiple parameters of symptomatology would enable an improvement in making a prognosis. In conclusion, we propose establishing a simple semi-quantitative clinical score of the main symptoms of CES.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ma B, Wu H, Jia LS, Yuan W, Shi GD, Shi JG (2009) Cauda equina syndrome: a review of clinical progress. Chin Med J (Engl) 122:1214–1222

    Google Scholar 

  2. Podnar S, Oblak C, Vodusek DB (2002) Sexual function in men with cauda equina lesions: a clinical and electromyographic study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73:715–720

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuso FA, Dias AL, Letaif OB, Cristante AF, Marcon RM, de Barros TE (2013) Epidemiological study of cauda equina syndrome. Acta Ortop Bras 21:159–162. doi:10.1590/S1413-78522013000300006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim JS, Lee SH, Arbatti NJ (2010) Dorsal extradural lumbar disc herniation causing cauda equina syndrome: a case report and review of literature. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 47:217–220. doi:10.3340/jkns.2010.47.3.217

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Todd NV (2009) Letter to the editor concerning “Cauda Equina Syndrome treated by surgical decompression: the influence of timing on surgical outcome” by Qureshi A, Sell P (2007) Eur Spine J 16:2143–2151. Eur Spine J 18:1391–1392; author reply 1393. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1039-0

  6. Levis JT (2009) Cauda Equina syndrome. West J Emerg Med 10:20

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Busse JW, Bhandari M, Schnittker JB, Reddy K, Dunlop RB (2001) Delayed presentation of cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation: functional outcomes and health-related quality of life. CJEM 3:285–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Srikandarajah N, Boissaud-Cooke MA, Clark S, Wilby MJ (2015) Does early surgical decompression in cauda equina syndrome improve bladder outcome? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:580–583. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aly TA, Aboramadan MO (2014) Efficacy of delayed decompression of lumbar disk herniation causing cauda equina syndrome. Orthopedics 37:e153–e156. doi:10.3928/01477447-20140124-18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hakan T (2012) Lumbar disk herniation presented with cauda equina syndrome in a pregnant woman. J Neurosci Rural Pract 3:197–199. doi:10.4103/0976-3147.98243

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Andersen JC (2011) Is immediate imaging important in managing low back pain? J Athl Train 46:99–102. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-46.1.99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fraser S, Roberts L, Murphy E (2009) Cauda equina syndrome: a literature review of its definition and clinical presentation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90:1964–1968. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.03.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwetlick G (1998) Microsurgery in lumbar disk operations. Possibilities, methods and results. Orthopade 27:457–465

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang HS, Nakagawa H, Mizuno J (2000) Lumbar herniated disc presenting with cauda equina syndrome. Long-term follow-up of four cases. Surg Neurol 53:100–104 (discussion 105)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shapiro S (2000) Medical realities of cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:348–351 (discussion 352)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dhatt S, Tahasildar N, Tripathy SK, Bahadur R, Dhillon M (2011) Outcome of spinal decompression in Cauda Equina syndrome presenting late in developing countries: case series of 50 cases. Eur Spine J 20:2235–2239. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1840-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Shi J, Jia L, Yuan W, Shi G, Ma B, Wang B, Wu J (2010) Clinical classification of cauda equina syndrome for proper treatment. Acta Orthop 81:391–395. doi:10.3109/17453674.2010.483985

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Arrigo RT, Kalanithi P, Boakye M (2011) Is cauda equina syndrome being treated within the recommended time frame? Neurosurgery 68:1520–1526. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820cd426 (discussion 1526)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Podnar S, Vodusek DB (2015) Lower urinary tract dysfunction in patients with peripheral nervous system lesions. Handb Clin Neurol 130:203–224. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-63247-0.00012-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McCarthy MJ, Aylott CE, Grevitt MP, Hegarty J (2007) Cauda equina syndrome: factors affecting long-term functional and sphincteric outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:207–216. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000251750.20508.84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Qureshi A, Sell P (2007) Cauda equina syndrome treated by surgical decompression: the influence of timing on surgical outcome. Eur Spine J 16:2143–2151. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0491-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kostuik JP, Harrington I, Alexander D, Rand W, Evans D (1986) Cauda equina syndrome and lumbar disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:386–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Korse NS, Pijpers JA, van Zwet E, Elzevier HW, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL (2017) Cauda equina syndrome: presentation, outcome, and predictors with focus on micturition, defecation, and sexual dysfunction. Eur Spine J 26:894–904. doi:10.1007/s00586-017-4943-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahn UM, Ahn NU, Buchowski JM, Garrett ES, Sieber AN, Kostuik JP (2000) Cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:1515–1522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Todd NV (2011) Causes and outcomes of cauda equina syndrome in medico-legal practice: a single neurosurgical experience of 40 consecutive cases. Br J Neurosurg 25:503–508. doi:10.3109/02688697.2010.550344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jalloh I, Minhas P (2007) Delays in the treatment of cauda equina syndrome due to its variable clinical features in patients presenting to the emergency department. Emerg Med J 24:33–34. doi:10.1136/emj.2006.038182

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Laoire SA, Crockard HA, Thomas DG (1981) Prognosis for sphincter recovery after operation for cauda equina compression owing to lumbar disc prolapse. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 282:1852–1854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fairbank J, Hashimoto R, Dailey A, Patel AA, Dettori JR (2011) Does patient history and physical examination predict MRI proven cauda equina syndrome? Evid Based Spine Care J 2:27–33. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1274754

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kennedy JG, Soffe KE, McGrath A, Stephens MM, Walsh MG, McManus F (1999) Predictors of outcome in cauda equina syndrome. Eur Spine J 8:317–322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Shephard RH (1959) Diagnosis and prognosis of cauda equina syndrome produced by protrusion of lumbar disk. Br Med J 2:1434–1439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Dinning TA, Schaeffer HR (1993) Discogenic compression of the cauda equina: a surgical emergency. Aust N Z J Surg 63:927–934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Todd NV (2009) An algorithm for suspected cauda equina syndrome. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91:358–359. doi:10.1308/003588409X428487 (author reply 359–360)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ahn NU, Ahn UM, Nallamshetty L, Springer BD, Buchowski JM, Funches L, Garrett ES, Kostuik JP, Kebaish KM, Sponseller PD (2001) Cauda equina syndrome in ankylosing spondylitis (the CES-AS syndrome): meta-analysis of outcomes after medical and surgical treatments. J Spinal Disord 14:427–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hussain SA, Gullan RW, Chitnavis BP (2003) Cauda equina syndrome: outcome and implications for management. Br J Neurosurg 17:164–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mangialardi R, Mastorillo G, Minoia L, Garofalo R, Conserva F, Solarino GB (2002) Lumbar disc herniation and cauda equina syndrome. Considerations on a pathology with different clinical manifestations. Chir Organi Mov 87:35–42

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. McLaren AC, Bailey SI (1986) Cauda equina syndrome: a complication of lumbar discectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 204:143–149

    Google Scholar 

  37. Todd NV (2005) Cauda equina syndrome: the timing of surgery probably does influence outcome. Br J Neurosurg 19:301–306. doi:10.1080/02688690500305324 (discussion 307–308)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Korse NS, Nicolai MP, Both S, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Elzevier HW (2016) Discussing sexual health in spinal care. Eur Spine J 25:766–773. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3991-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Warener Straße 7, 12683, Berlin, Germany

    Alexander König, Lisa Amelung, Marco Danne, Ullrich Meier & Johannes Lemcke

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Alexander König

Authors
  1. Alexander König
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lisa Amelung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marco Danne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ullrich Meier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Johannes Lemcke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Lemcke.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

König, A., Amelung, L., Danne, M. et al. Do we know the outcome predictors for cauda equine syndrome (CES)? A retrospective, single-center analysis of 60 patients with CES with a suggestion for a new score to measure severity of symptoms. Eur Spine J 26, 2565–2572 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5131-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5131-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation