Skip to main content
Log in

Radiation exposure using the O-arm® surgical imaging system

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study was conducted to characterise the O-arm® surgical imaging system in terms of patient organ doses and medical staff occupational exposure during three-dimensional thoracic spine and pelvic examinations.

Methods

An anthropomorphic phantom was used to evaluate absorbed organ doses during a three-dimensional thoracic spine scan and a three-dimensional pelvic scan with the O-arm®. Staff occupational exposure was evaluated by constructing an ambient dose cartography of the operating theatre during a three-dimensional pelvic scan as well as using an anthropomorphic phantom to simulate the O-arm® operator.

Results

Patient organ doses ranged from 30 ± 4 μGy to 20.0 ± 3.0 mGy and 4 ± 1 μGy to 6.7 ± 1.0 mGy for a three-dimensional thoracic spine and pelvic examination, respectively. For a single three-dimensional acquisition, the maximum ambient equivalent dose at 2 m from the iso-centre was 11 ± 1 μSv.

Conclusion

Doses delivered to the patient during a three-dimensional thoracic spine image acquisition were found to be significant with the O-arm®, but lower than those observed with a standard computed tomography examination. The detailed dose cartography allows for the optimisation of medical staff positioning within the operating theatre while imaging with the O-arm®.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Medtronic (2007) O-arm user manual, MN

  2. Jin M, Liu Z, Liu X, Yan H, Han X, Qiu Y, Zhu Z (2015) Does intraoperative navigation improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the apical region of dystrophic scoliosis secondary to neurofibromatosis type I: comparison between O-arm navigation and free-hand technique. Eur Spine J [Epub ahead of print]

  3. Van de Kelft E, Costa F, Van der Planken D, Schils F (2012) A prospective multicenter registry on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic, lumbar and sacral level with the use of the O-arm imaging system and StealthStation navigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:E1580–E1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beir VII (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation, National Research Council of the National Academies, Washington D.C

  5. Park MS, Lee KM, Lee B, Min E, Kim Y, Jeon S, Huh Y, Lee K (2012) Comparison of operator radiation exposure between C-arm and O-arm fluoroscopy for orthopaedic surgery. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 148:431–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lange J, Karellas A, Street J, Eck JC, Lapinsky A, Connolly PJ, Dipaola CP (2013) Estimating the effective radiation dose imparted by intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography in thoracolumbar spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E306–E312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang J, Weir V, Fajardo L, Lin J, Hsiung H, Ritenour ER (2009) Dosimetric characterization of a cone-beam O-arm imaging system. J Xray Sci Technol 17:305–317

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. CIRS (2012) ATOM dosimetry phantoms, VA

  9. ICRP (1975) Report on the task group on reference man. Publication 23, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  10. ICRU (1992) Phantoms and computational models in therapy, diagnosis and protection. Publication 48, MD

    Google Scholar 

  11. JCGM-W (2008) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  12. APVL (2011) Manuel d’utilisation AT1123 V1. Saint-Cyr-sur-Loire, France

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hadelsberg UP, Harel R (2012) Hazards of ionizing radiation and its impact on spine surgery. World Neurosurg [Epub ahead of print]

  14. Qureshi S, Lu Y, McAnany S, Baird E (2014) Three-dimensional intraoperative imaging modalities in orthopaedic surgery: a narrative review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 22:800–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Söderberg M, Abul-Kasim K, Ohlin A, Gunnarsson M (2011) Estimation of organ and effective dose to the patient during spinal surgery with a cone-beam O-arm system. Proc SPIE 7961:79613G1-G6

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang D, Li X, Gao Y, Xu X, Liu B (2013) A method to acquire CT organ dose map using OSL dosimeters and atom anthropomorphic phantoms. Med Phys 40:081918

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. ICRP (2007) Radiological protection in medicine. Publication 105, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Pitteloud.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pitteloud, N., Gamulin, A., Barea, C. et al. Radiation exposure using the O-arm® surgical imaging system. Eur Spine J 26, 651–657 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4773-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4773-0

Keywords

Navigation