Abstract
Study design
Biomechanical investigation.
Purpose
This study describes ex vivo evaluation of the range of motion (ROM) to characterize the stability and need for additional dorsal fixation after cervical single-level, two-level or multilevel corpectomy (CE) to elucidate biomechanical differences between anterior-only and supplemental dorsal instrumentation.
Methods
Twelve human cervical cadaveric spines were loaded in a spine tester with pure moments of 1.5 Nm in lateral bending (LB), flexion/extension (FE), and axial rotation (AR), followed by two cyclic loading periods for three-level corpectomies. After each cyclic loading session, flexibility tests were performed for anterior-only instrumentation (group_1, six specimens) and circumferential instrumentation (group_2, six specimens).
Results
The flexibility tests for all circumferential instrumentations showed a significant decrease in ROM in comparison with the intact state and anterior-only instrumentations. In comparison with the intact state, supplemental dorsal instrumentation after three-level CE reduced the ROM to 12 % (±10 %), 9 % (±12 %), and 22 % (±18 %) in LB, FE, and AR, respectively. The anterior-only construct outperformed the intact state only in FE, with a significant ROM reduction to 57 % (±35 %), 60 % (±27 %), and 62 % (±35 %) for one-, two- and three-level CE, respectively.
Conclusions
The supplemental dorsal instrumentation provided significantly more stability than the anterior-only instrumentation regardless of the number of levels resected and the direction of motion. After cyclic loading, the absolute differences in stability between the two instrumentations remained significant while both instrumentations showed a comparable increase of ROM after cyclic loading. The large difference in the absolute ROM of anterior-only compared to circumferential instrumentations supports a dorsal support in case of three-level approaches.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ozgen S, Naderi S, Ozek MM, Pamir MN (2004) A retrospective review of cervical corpectomy: indications, complications and outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 146:1099–1105. doi:10.1007/s00701-004-0327-z (discussion 1105)
Atanasiu JP, Badatcheff F, Pidhorz L (1993) Metastatic lesions of the cervical spine. A retrospective analysis of 20 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:1279–1284
Barros Filho TE, Oliveira RP, Grave JM, Taricco MA (1993) Corpectomy and anterior plating in cervical spine fractures with tetraplegia. Rev Paul Med 111:375–377
Wang JC, Hart RA, Emery SE, Bohlman HH (2003) Graft migration or displacement after multilevel cervical corpectomy and strut grafting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1016–1021. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000061998.62204.D7 (discussion 1021–2)
Boakye M, Patil CG, Ho C, Lad SP (2008) Cervical corpectomy: complications and outcomes. Neurosurgery 63:295–301. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000327028.45886.2E (discussion 301–2)
Eleraky MA, Llanos C, Sonntag VK (1999) Cervical corpectomy: report of 185 cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 90:35–41
Daubs MD (2005) Early failures following cervical corpectomy reconstruction with titanium mesh cages and anterior plating. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:1402–1406
Sasso RC, Ruggiero RA, Reilly TM, Hall PV (2003) Early reconstruction failures after multilevel cervical corpectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:140–142. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000041590.90290.56
Vaccaro AR, Falatyn SP, Scuderi GJ, Eismont FJ, McGuire RA, Singh K, Garfin SR (1998) Early failure of long segment anterior cervical plate fixation. J Spinal Disord 11:410–415
Panjabi MM, Isomi T, Wang JL (1999) Loosening at the screw–vertebra junction in multilevel anterior cervical plate constructs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:2383–2388
Sevki K, Mehmet T, Ufuk T, Azmi H, Mercan S, Erkal B (2004) Results of surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy: Anterior cervical corpectomy and stabilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:2493–2500
Aryan HE, Sanchez-Mejia RO, Ben-Haim S, Ames CP (2007) Successful treatment of cervical myelopathy with minimal morbidity by circumferential decompression and fusion. Eur Spine J 16:1401–1409. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0291-9
Setzer M, Eleraky M, Johnson WM, Aghayev K, Tran ND, Vrionis FD (2012) Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 16:579–584. doi:10.3171/2012.2.SPINE11611
Acosta FL, Aryan HE, Chou D, Ames CP (2008) Long-term biomechanical stability and clinical improvement after extended multilevel corpectomy and circumferential reconstruction of the cervical spine using titanium mesh cages. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:165–174. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180654205
Panjabi MM, Krag M, Summers D, Videman T (1985) Biomechanical time-tolerance of fresh cadaveric human spine specimens. J Orthop Res 3:292–300. doi:10.1002/jor.1100030305
Wilke HJ, Jungkunz B, Wenger K, Claes LE (1998) Spinal segment range of motion as a function of in vitro test conditions: effects of exposure period, accumulated cycles, angular-deformation rate, and moisture condition. Anat Rec 251:15–19
Panjabi MM (1988) Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: I. A conceptual framework. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13:1129–1134
Wilke HJ, Mehnert U, Claes LE, Bierschneider MM, Jaksche H, Boszczyk BM (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty with polymethyl methacrylate or calcium phosphate cement under cyclic loading. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2934–2941. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000248423.28511.44
Kristof RA, Kiefer T, Thudium M, Ringel F, Stoffel M, Kovacs A, Mueller CA (2009) Comparison of ventral corpectomy and plate–screw-instrumented fusion with dorsal laminectomy and rod–screw-instrumented fusion for treatment of at least two vertebral-level spondylotic cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J 18:1951–1956. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-1110-x
Liu Y, Qi M, Chen H, Yang L, Wang X, Shi G, Gao R, Wang C, Yuan W (2012) Comparative analysis of complications of different reconstructive techniques following anterior decompression for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 21:2428–2435. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2323-y
Herrmann AM, Geisler FH (2004) Geometric results of anterior cervical plate stabilization in degenerative disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:1226–1234
Mourning D, Reitman CA, Heggeness MH, Esses SI, Hipp JA (2007) Initial intervertebral stability after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plating. Spine J 7:643–646. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2006.10.024
Singh K, Vaccaro AR, Kim J, Lorenz EP, Lim TH, An HS (2003) Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:2352–2358. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000085344.22471.23 (discussion 2358)
Koller H, Hempfing A, Ferraris L, Maier O, Hitzl W, Metz-Stavenhagen P (2007) 4- and 5-level anterior fusions of the cervical spine: review of literature and clinical results. Eur Spine J 16:2055–2071. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0398-7
Hee HT, Majd ME, Holt RT, Whitecloud TS, Pienkowski D (2003) Complications of multilevel cervical corpectomies and reconstruction with titanium cages and anterior plating. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:1–8 (discussion 8–9)
Uribe JS, Sangala JR, Duckworth EA, Vale FL (2009) Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy fusion and cervical corpectomy fusion using titanium cages for reconstruction: analysis of outcome and long-term follow-up. Eur Spine J 18:654–662. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-0897-9
Doğan S, Baek S, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR (2008) Biomechanical consequences of cervical spondylectomy versus corpectomy. Neurosurgery 63:303–308. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000327569.03654.96 (discussion 308)
Singh K, Vaccaro AR, Kim J, Lorenz EP, Lim TH, An HS (2004) Enhancement of stability following anterior cervical corpectomy: a biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:845–849
Koller H, Schmidt R, Mayer M, Hitzl W, Zenner J, Midderhoff S, Middendorf S, Graf N, Gräf N, Resch H, Wilke HJ, Willke HJ (2010) The stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior and combined techniques for the reconstruction of a 2-level cervical corpectomy model: biomechanical study and first results of ATPS prototyping. Eur Spine J 19:2137–2148. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1503-x
Schmidt R, Koller H, Wilke HJ, Brade J, Zenner J, Meier O, Ferraris L, Mayer M (2010) The impact of cervical pedicle screws for primary stability in multilevel posterior cervical stabilizations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E1167–E1171. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e6bc59
Porter RW, Crawford NR, Chamberlain RH, Park SC, Detwiler PW, Apostolides PJ, Sonntag VK (2003) Biomechanical analysis of multilevel cervical corpectomy and plate constructs. J Neurosurg 99:98–103
Schmidt R, Wilke HJ, Claes L, Puhl W, Richter M (2003) Pedicle screws enhance primary stability in multilevel cervical corpectomies: biomechanical in vitro comparison of different implants including constrained and nonconstrained posterior instumentations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1821–1828. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000083287.23521.48
Koller H, Schmoelz W, Zenner J, Auffarth A, Resch H, Hitzl W, Malekzadeh D, Ernstbrunner L, Blocher M, Mayer M (2015) Construct stability of an instrumented 2-level cervical corpectomy model following fatigue testing: biomechanical comparison of circumferential antero-posterior instrumentation versus a novel anterior-only transpedicular screw–plate fixation technique. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3770-z
Isomi T, Panjabi MM, Wang JL, Vaccaro AR, Garfin SR, Patel T (1999) Stabilizing potential of anterior cervical plates in multilevel corpectomies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:2219–2223
Kirkpatrick JS, Levy JA, Carillo J, Moeini SR (1999) Reconstruction after multilevel corpectomy in the cervical spine. A sagittal plane biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1186–1190 (discussion 1191)
Acknowledgments
Funding for this study was provided by the Tyrolean research fund (Tiroler Wissenschaftsfond, TWF). All of the implants were provided free of charge by DepuySynthes.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has any conflicts of interest in connection with the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hartmann, S., Thomé, C., Keiler, A. et al. Biomechanical testing of circumferential instrumentation after cervical multilevel corpectomy. Eur Spine J 24, 2788–2798 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4167-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4167-8