Abstract
Purpose
Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TILCS), facilitates the communication between physicians, and guides to treatment decision with better outcome. A composite injury severity score is calculated from these characteristics stratifying patients into operative and non-operative treatment. Aim of this study is to identify the effectiveness of TLICS scoring for thoracolumbar vertebral fractures without neurological deficits and the efficacy of conservative treatment in patients with TILCS 4.
Methods
58 patients with thoracolumbar fracture were included. 38 patients with TLICS 1–3 (group A) and 20 patients with TLICS 4 (group B) treated conservatively, were evaluated with traditional two-plain radiographic examination, CT-scan and MRI. The pain and functional scales were used in the clinical evaluation. Local kyphosis angle, sagittal index and height loss percentage were measured in the radiologic evaluation. Mean follow-up period was 28 months. Post-fracture and follow-up values were compared. Functional scores and clinical outcomes of the groups were compared.
Results
The mean pain (1 = worse pain, reverse-VAS) and functional scores at the final follow-up were 8.2 and 86 points, respectively (group A), 6.4 and 76 points (group B). The mean period for returning to work was 3.2 (group A) and 3.8 months (group B). Comparing the two groups did not demonstrate any statistical difference of their clinical and functional outcomes.
Conclusion
The study’s results demonstrate that conservative treatment for TLICS 4 thoracolumbar fractures can be safely applied. The conservative treatment of cases scoring TLICS 4 is equally effective to those scoring ≤3.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lee JY et al (2005) Thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score: a new paradigm for the treatment of thoracolumbar spine trauma. J Orthop Sci 10(6):671–675
Vaccaro AR et al (2005) A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(20):2325–2333
Vaccaro AR et al (2006) Reliability of a novel classification system for thoracolumbar injuries: the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score. Spine (Phila Pa) 1976 31(11 Suppl):S62–S69 (discussion S104)
Bono CM et al (2006) Validating a newly proposed classification system for thoracolumbar spine trauma: looking to the future of the thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score. J Orthop Trauma 20(8):567–572
Joaquim AF et al (2014) Measuring the impact of the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score among 458 consecutively treated patients. J Spinal Cord Med 37(1):101–106
Wood KB et al (2014) Management of thoracolumbar spine fractures. Spine J 14(1):145–164
Joaquim AF et al (2013) Retrospective evaluation of the validity of the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System in 458 consecutively treated patients. Spine J 13(12):1760–1765
Joaquim AF, Patel AA (2013) Relationships between the Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen Spine System and the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System: an analysis of the literature. J Spinal Cord Med 36(6):586–590
Patel AA et al (2009) Thoracolumbar spine trauma classification: the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score system and case examples. J Neurosurg Spine 10(3):201–206
Joaquim AF, Patel AA (2013) Thoracolumbar spine trauma: evaluation and surgical decision-making. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 4(1):3–9
Lee HM et al (2000) Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting posterior ligament complex injury in thoracolumbar spinal fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(16):2079–2084
Khurana B et al (2013) Traumatic thoracolumbar spine injuries: what the spine surgeon wants to know. Radiographics 33(7):2031–2046
Haba H et al (2003) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting posterior ligamentous complex injury associated with thoracic and lumbar fractures. J Neurosurg 99(1 Suppl):20–26
Vaccaro AR et al (2009) Injury of the posterior ligamentous complex of the thoracolumbar spine: a prospective evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(23):E841–E847
Joaquim AF et al (2011) Evaluation of the thoracolumbar injury classification system in thoracic and lumbar spinal trauma. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(1):33–36
Rihn JA et al (2008) A review of the TLICS system: a novel, user-friendly thoracolumbar trauma classification system. Acta Orthop 79(4):461–466
Nicoll EA (1949) Fractures of the dorso-lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 31B(3):376–394
Holdsworth F (1970) Fractures, dislocations, and fracture-dislocations of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(8):1534–1551
Louis R (1977) Unstable fractures of the spine. III. Instability. A. Theories concerning instability. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 63(5):423–425
Denis F (1983) The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8(8):817–831
Magerl F et al (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3(4):184–201
Koh YD, Kim DJ, Koh YW (2010) Reliability and Validity of Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS). Asian Spine J 4(2):109–117
Lewkonia P, Paolucci EO, Thomas K (2012) Reliability of the thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score and comparison with the Denis classification for injury to the thoracic and lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(26):2161–2167
Conflict of interest
The authors state that no conflict of interest exists. All authors have made an important contribution to the study. The study has been approved by IRB of our hospital as required.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pneumaticos, S.G., Karampinas, P.K., Triantafilopoulos, G. et al. Evaluation of TLICS for thoracolumbar fractures. Eur Spine J 25, 1123–1127 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3889-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3889-y