Skip to main content
Log in

Spondylolysis and spina bifida occulta in pediatric patients: prevalence study using computed tomography as a screening method

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The prevalence of spondylolysis reported from radiograph-based studies has been questioned in recent computed tomography (CT)-based studies in adults; however, no new data are available in pediatric patients. Spina bifida occulta (SBO), which has been associated to spondylolysis, may be increasing its prevalence, according to recent studies in adults in the last decades, but without new data in pediatric patients. We aimed to determine the prevalence of spondylolysis and SBO in pediatric patients using abdomen and pelvis CT as a screening tool.

Methods

We studied 228 patients 4–15 years old (107 males), who were evaluated with abdomen and pelvis CT scans for reasons not related to the spine. The entire lumbo-sacral spine was evaluated to detect the presence of spondylolysis and SBO. We compared the prevalence of spondylolysis in patients with and without SBO. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the effect of age and sex as independent predictors of spondylolysis and SBO.

Results

The prevalence of spondylolysis was 3.5 % (1.1–5.9 %); 2/8 patients presented with olisthesis, both with grade I slip. The prevalence of SBO was 41.2 % (34.8–59.2 %) (94 patients). Spondylolysis was not more frequent in patients with SBO than in patients without SBO. Male sex and decreasing age independently predicted the presence of SBO, but not of spondylolysis.

Conclusion

We observed a 3.5 % prevalence of spondylolysis and a 41.2 % prevalence of SBO. SBO was significantly more frequent in males and younger patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fredrickson BE, Baker D, McHolick WJ, Yuan HA, Lubicky JP (1984) The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 66:699–707

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eubanks JD, Cheruvu VK (2009) Prevalence of sacral spina bifida occulta and its relationship to age, sex, race, and the sacral table angle: an anatomic, osteologic study of three thousand one hundred specimens. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1539–1543. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a98560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fidas A, MacDonald HL, Elton RA, Wild SR, Chisholm GD, Scott R (1987) Prevalence and patterns of spina bifida occulta in 2,707 normal adults. Clin Radiol 38:537–542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Solomon LB, Ruhli FJ, Lee YC, Henneberg M (2009) Secular trend in the opening of the sacral canal: an Australian study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:244–248. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181908ca2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gregerson DM (1997) Clinical consequences of spina bifida occulta. J Manip Physiol Ther 20:546–550

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee YC, Solomon LB, Ruhli FJ, Schiess R, Ohrstrom L, Sullivan T, Alkadhi H, Henneberg M (2011) Confirmation of microevolutionary increase in spina bifida occulta among Swiss birth cohorts. Eur Spine J 20:776–780. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1519-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalichman L, Kim DH, Li L, Guermazi A, Berkin V, Hunter DJ (2009) Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: prevalence and association with low back pain in the adult community-based population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:199–205. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818edcfd

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sakai T, Sairyo K, Takao S, Nishitani H, Yasui N (2009) Incidence of lumbar spondylolysis in the general population in Japan based on multidetector computed tomography scans from two thousand subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2346–2350. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4abbe

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Belfi LM, Ortiz AO, Katz DS (2006) Computed tomography evaluation of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in asymptomatic patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E907–E910. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000245947.31473.0a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brooks BK, Southam SL, Mlady GW, Logan J, Rosett M (2010) Lumbar spine spondylolysis in the adult population: using computed tomography to evaluate the possibility of adult onset lumbar spondylosis as a cause of back pain. Skelet Radiol 39:669–673. doi:10.1007/s00256-009-0825-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ko SB, Lee SW (2011) Prevalence of spondylolysis and its relationship with low back pain in selected population. Clin Orthop Surg 3:34–38. doi:10.4055/cios.2011.3.1.34

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyerding H (1932) Spondylolisthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 54:371–377

    Google Scholar 

  13. Virta L, Ronnemaa T, Osterman K, Aalto T, Laakso M (1992) Prevalence of isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis in middle-aged subjects from eastern and western Finland. J Clin Epidemiol 45:917–922

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stewart TD (1953) [The age incidence of neural-arch defects in Alaskan natives, considered from the standpoint of etiology]. J Bone Jt Surg Am 35-A:937–950

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roche MB, Rowe GG (1951) The incidence of separate neural arch and coincident bone variations; a survey of 4,200 skeletons. Anat Rec 109:233–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Soler T, Calderon C (2000) The prevalence of spondylolysis in the Spanish elite athlete. Am J Sports Med 28:57–62

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rossi F, Dragoni S (1990) Lumbar spondylolysis: occurrence in competitive athletes. Updated achievements in a series of 390 cases. J Sports Med Phys Fit 30:450–452

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. El Rassi G, Takemitsu M, Woratanarat P, Shah SA (2005) Lumbar spondylolysis in pediatric and adolescent soccer players. Am J Sports Med 33:1688–1693. doi:10.1177/0363546505275645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Copp AJ, Stanier P, Greene ND (2013) Neural tube defects: recent advances, unsolved questions, and controversies. Lancet Neurol 12:799–810. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70110-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group (1991) Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. Lancet 338:131–137

  21. Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, Li L, Suri P, Guermazi A, Hunter DJ (2009) Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study. Spine J 9:545–550. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kebaish KM, Neubauer PR, Voros GD, Khoshnevisan MA, Skolasky RL (2011) Scoliosis in adults aged 40 years and older: prevalence and relationship to age, race, and gender. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:731–736. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e9f120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Urrutia J, Diaz-Ledezma C, Espinosa J, Berven SH (2011) Lumbar scoliosis in postmenopausal women: prevalence and relationship with bone density, age, and body mass index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:737–740. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181db7456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Urrutia J, Zamora T, Klaber I (2014) Thoracic scoliosis prevalence in patients 50 years or older and its relationship with age, sex, and thoracic kyphosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:149–152. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000095

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julio Urrutia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Urrutia, J., Cuellar, J. & Zamora, T. Spondylolysis and spina bifida occulta in pediatric patients: prevalence study using computed tomography as a screening method. Eur Spine J 25, 590–595 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3480-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3480-y

Keywords

Navigation