Abstract
Purpose
Though surgical decompression is today a common option for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), little is known about the exact postoperative early neurological recovery course. The purpose of this study was to analyze the functional recovery, its dynamics, its intensity and its pattern, in the early postoperative period after surgical decompression for CSM.
Methods
A prospective non-controlled observational study was performed from March 2006 to July 2008, and included consecutive patients with CSM who underwent surgical decompression. Functional assessments were done before the operation, at 1 month, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery using three tests: the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) test, the nine-hole peg test (9HPT) and the Crockard walking test.
Results
Sixty-seven patients were included (mean age of 61 years). The global JOA score improved after surgery, reaching statistical significance at 1 month (from 11.5 ± 2.6 to 13.6 ± 2.0 points, p = 0.0078), then settling to a plateau till the end of follow-up at 24 months (12.7 ± 2.6 points). The 9HPT and the Crockard test did not show any significant improvement after surgery.
Conclusions
Neurological recovery after surgical decompression has been proved to be very fast during the first month, but stabilizes afterwards. The JOA score is the best assessment to reveal neurological improvement in the early recovery course.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McCormack B, Weinstein P (1996) Cervical spondylosis: an update. West J Med 165:43–51
Clark E, Robinson P (1956) Complication of cervical spondylosis. Brain 79:483–510
Fehlings M, Wilson J, Yoon S, Rhee J, Shamji M, Lawrence B (2013) Symptomatic progression of cervical myelopathy and the role of nonsurgical management: a consensus statement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(22 Suppl 1):S19–S20
Carol M, Ducker T (1998) Cervical spondylitic myelopathies: surgical treatment. J Spinal Disord 1:59–65
Sampath P, Bendebba M, Davis J, Ducker T (2000) Outcomes of patients treated for cervical myelopathy—a prospective, multicentre study with independent clinical review. Spine 25:670–676
Teramoto T, Ohmori K, Takatsu T, Inoue H, Ishida Y, Suzuki K (1994) A long-term results of anterior cervical spondylodesis. Neurosurgery 35:64–68
Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Iwasaki H, Yoshida M, Ando M, Yamada H (2000) A comparison study of surgical approaches for cervical compressive myelopathy. Clin Orthop Rel Res 381:129–136
Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, Asano M, Ono K (1992) Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy: a comparative study of results in multisegment cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 17:1281–1284
Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Vaccaro A, Yoon S, Arnold P, Massicotte E, Fehlings M (2013) A clinical prediction model to determine outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: data from the prospective, multi-center AO Spine North America study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(18):1659–1666
Fehlings M, Barry S, Kopjar B, Tim Yoon SAP, Massicotte EM, Vaccaro A, Brodke DS, Shaffrey C, Smith JS, Woodard E, Banco RJ, Chapman J, Janssen M, Bono C, Sasso R, Dekutoski M, Gokaslan ZL (2013) Anterior vs posterior surgical approaches to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy: outcomes of the prospective multicenter AOSpine North America CSM study in 264 patients. Spine 38(26):2247–2252 (Epub ahead of print)
Traynelis V, Arnold P, Fourney D, Bransford R, Fischer D, Skelly A (2013) Alternative procedures for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: arthroplasty, oblique corpectomy, skip laminectomy: evaluation of comparative effectiveness and safety. Spine 38(22 Suppl 1):S210–S231 (Epub ahead print)
Cheung W, Arvinte D, Wong Y, Luk K, Cheung K (2008) Neurological recovery after surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy—a prospective study. Int Orthop 32(2):273–278
Engsberg J, Laurysseen C, Ross S, Hollman J, Walker D, Wippold F (2003) Spasticity, strength, and gait changes after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy—a case report. Spine 28:136–139
Pascal-Moussellard H, Despeignes L, Olindo S, Rouvillain J, Catonne Y (2005) Neurological recovery after cervical cord compression for canal stenosis myelopathy. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 91(7):607–614
Prabhu K, Babu K, Bot S, Chacko A (2005) Rapid opening and closing of the hand as a measure of early neurologic recovery in the upper extremity after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:105–108
Al-Tamimi Y, Guilfoyle M, Seeley H, Laing R (2013) Measurement of long-term outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated surgically. Eur Spine J 22(11):2552–2557
Yonenobu K, Abumi K, Nagata K, Taketomi E, Ueyama K (2001) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Japanese orthopaedic association scoring system for évaluation of cervical compression myelopathy. Spine 26:1890–1895
Oxford-Grice K, Vogel K, Vollmer M (2003) Adults norms for a commercially available nine hole peg test for finger dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 57:570–573
Singh A, Crockard H (1999) Quantitative assessment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy by a simple walking test. Lancet 354:370–373
Hirabayashi K, Satomi K (1998) Operative procédure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine 13:870–876
Kadanka Z, Mares M, Bednanik J, Smrcka V, Krbec M, Stejskal L (2002) Approaches to cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Conservative versus surgical results in a 3 year follow-up study. Spine 27:2205–2211
Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y (1983) Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine 8:693–699
Matsuda Y, Shibata T, Oki S, Kawatani Y, Mashima N, Oishi H (1999) Outcomes of surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy in patients more than 75 years of age. Spine 24:529–534
Satomi K, Nishu Y, Kohno T, Hirabayashi K (1994) Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 19:507–510
Kimura I, Shingu H, Nasu Y (1995) Long-term follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by canal expansive laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 77:956–961
Anderson P, Matz P, Groff M, Heary RF, Holly LT, Kaiser MG, Mummaneni PV, Ryken TC, Choudhri TF, Vresilovic EJ, Resnick DK, Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons (2009) Laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 11(2):150–156
Cunningham M, Hershman S, Bendo J (2010) Systematic review of cohort studies comparing surgical treatments for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 35(5):537–543
Geck M, Eismont F (2002) Surgical options for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Orthop Clin North Am 33(2):329–348
Jiang S, Jiang L, Dai L (2012) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylosis: a systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(2):155–161
Seichi A, Takeshita K, Ohishi I, Kawaguchi H, Akune T, Anamizu Y (2001) Long-term results of double door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 26:479–487
Suda K, Abumi K, Ito M, Shono Y, Kaneda K, Fujiya M (2003) Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 28:1258–1262
Edwards C, Heller J, Silcox D (2000) T-saw laminoplasty for the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy—clinical and radiological outcome. Spine 25:1788–1794
Fujiwara K, Yonenobu K, Ebara S, Yamashita K, Ono K (1989) The prognosis of surgery for cervical decompression myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 81:393–398
Yamazaki T, Yanaka K, Sato H, Uemura K, Tsukada A, Nose T (2003) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical results and factors affecting outcome with special reference to age differences. Neurosurgery 52:122–126
Machino M, Yukawa Y, Hida T, Ito K, Nakashima H, Kanbara S, Morita D, Kato F (2012) Persistent physical symptoms after laminoplasty: analysis of postoperative residual symptoms in 520 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 37(11):932–936
Fukuda K, Ozaki T, Tsumura N, Sengoku A, Nomi M, Yanagiuchi A, Nishida K, Kuroda R, Iguchi T (2013) Neurogenic bladder associated with pure cervical spondylotic myelopathy: clinical characteristics and recovery after surgery. Spine 38(2):104–111
Chiles B, Leonard M, Choudhri H, Cooper P (1999) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: patterns of neurological deficit and recovery after anterior cervical decompression. Neurosurgery 44:762–770
Nakashima H, Yukawa Y, Ito K, Machino MKS, Morita D, Imagama S, Hamajima N, Ishiguro N, Kato F (2011) Validity of the 10-s step test: prospective study comparing it with the 10-s grip and release test and the 30-m walking test. Eur Spine J 20(8):1318–1322
Kadaňka Z, Bednařík J, Novotný O, Urbánek I, Dušek L (2011) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: conservative versus surgical treatment after 10 years. Eur Spine J 20(9):1533–1538
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moussellard, H.P., Meyer, A., Biot, D. et al. Early neurological recovery course after surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study with 2-year follow-up using three different functional assessment tests. Eur Spine J 23, 1508–1514 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3315-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3315-x