Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A study investigating the validity of modified Tokuhashi score to decide surgical intervention in patients with metastatic spinal cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Predicted survival of a patient is the most important parameter that helps to guide the treatment of a patient with metastatic spinal cancer. We aimed to investigate the reliability of modified Tokuhashi score in the decision-making process in patients with metastatic spinal cancer.

Methods

We performed a review of our prospectively collected Metastatic Cancer Database over a period of 4 years (2007–2010). Ninety consecutive patients who were treated for metastatic spinal cancer were enrolled. Data review included demographic details, source of primary cancer, duration of symptoms, location of metastases, calculated Karnofsky’s performance status, and calculated survival based on modified Tokuhashi score. We divided the patients into 3 groups. Group A included patients with expected survival less than 6 months. Group B included patients with expected survival between 6 and 12 months. Group C included patients whose expected survival was more than 12 months. We compared the calculated expected survival to the actual survival in all three groups with all patients following up to a minimum of 1 year or until death. Statistical analysis was done by Chi-square test and the Fisher Exact test.

Results

The survival prediction in group C was significantly accurate in 80.9 % patients (P = 0.027). However, in groups A and B, only 36.1 and 9.1 % patients survived, respectively, as per predicted. (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

We can conclude from this study that, when used alone, modified Tokuhashi score may not be a reliable tool to predict survival in all patient groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pointillart V, Vital J, Salmi R, Diallo A, Quan GM (2011) Survival prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in patients with spinal metastases. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137:849–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Toriyama S et al (1990) Scoring system for the preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. Spine 15:1110–1113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Oda H, Oshima M, Ryu J (2005) A revised scoring system for preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. Spine 30(19):2186–2191 (Phila Pa 1976)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Kobayashi T et al (2001) Surgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine 26:298–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Karnofsky DA (1967) Clinical evaluation of anticancer drugs: cancer chemotherapy. GANN Monogr 2:223–231

    Google Scholar 

  6. Enkaoua EA, Doursounian L, Chatellier G, Mabesoone F, Aimard T, Saillant G (1997) Vertebral metastases: a critical appreciation of the preoperative prognostic Tokuhashi score in a series of 71 cases. Spine 22(19):2293–2298 (Phila Pa 1976)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Constans JP, de Donzelli DE, Spaziante R, Meder JF, Haye C (1983) Spinal metastases with neurological manifestations. Review of 600 cases. J Neurosurg 59(1):111–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hammerberg KW (1992) Surgical treatment of metastatic spine disease. Spine 17(10):1148–1153 (Phila Pa 1976)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Harrington KD (1986) Metastatic disease of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68(7):1110–1115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi D, Crockard A, Bunger C, Harms J, Kawahara N, Mazel C, Melcher R, Tomita K (2010) Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: the consensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group. Eur Spine J 19(2):215–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yilmazlar S, Dogan S, Caner B, Turkkan A, Bekar A, Korfali E (2008) Comparison of prognostic scores and surgical approaches to treat spinal metastatic tumors: a review of 57 cases. J Orthop Surg Res 3:37. doi:10.1186/1749-799X-3-37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeon SU, Kang DH, Park KB, Lee CH, Hwang SH, Park IS (2009) Is a revised Tokuhashi scoring system useful in preopertative evaluation of metastatic spinal tumor prognosis? Kor J Spine 6(3):181–186

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hessler C, Vettorazzi E, Madert J, Bokemeyer C, Panse J (2011) Actual and predicted survival time of patients with spinal metastases of lung cancer. evaluation of the robustness of the Tokuhashi score. Spine 36(12):983–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Leithner A, Radl R, Gruber G, Hochegger M, Leithner K, Welkerling H, Rehak P, Windhager R (2008) Predictive value of seven preoperative prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases. Eur Spine J 17(11):1488–1495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harinder Gakhar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gakhar, H., Swamy, G.N., Bommireddy, R. et al. A study investigating the validity of modified Tokuhashi score to decide surgical intervention in patients with metastatic spinal cancer. Eur Spine J 22, 565–568 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2480-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2480-z

Keywords

Navigation