Abstract
The aim of the paper is to inquire and discuss the specificities of the women’s approaches in leading organizations towards generating social innovation. What are the traits of women’s leadership and their role in managing and governing organizations? Are they holders of values, which raise their capability “to listen” and “to read” stakeholders expectations and needs in different socio-economic and historical contexts? The work provides a reply to these research questions by analyzing the role of women in two different Italian organizations. The first one is relative to an institution (“S. Giuseppe Institute for Maternal and Infant Help” in Rimini and the “Little Hospital Regina Elena”, currently named S. Giuseppe Onlus) that, from the beginning of the Nineteenth century, played a key role in the local and national context (Italy) in protecting illegitimate motherhood and children, which represented from centuries a social and cultural plague in the Country. The second one is relative to an Italian large-sized multi-utility company (SGR Group) based in Rimini and developed abroad (Bulgaria) which is family owned and whose sustainability-oriented process is driven for years by the vision of a female President. The reflections emerged from the analysis contribute to understand the potential of women in generating social innovation through their management and leadership and the changes “silently” promoted within organizations. Coherently, the work contributes to nurture a field which has still to be improved in order to disclose the frequently “hidden” role of women in promoting CSR and sustainability and developing the socio-economic and territorial context, in Italy and abroad.
Zusammenfassung
Dieser Beitrag zielt darauf ab, die spezifisch bei Frauen feststellbaren Herangehensweisen in der Unternehmensführung im Hinblick auf die sich aus diesen ergebenen sozialen Innovationen darzulegen bzw. zu ergründen. Wodurch ist weibliche Führung bzw. deren Rolle beim Management und bei der Leitung von Organisationen gekennzeichnet? Werden Frauen dabei von Werten bestimmt, welche ihre eigene Fähigkeit steigern, den Erwartungen und Bedürfnissen der Interessevertretungen in den jeweiligen sozio-ökonomischen und historischen Zusammenhängen ‚zuzuhören‘ bzw. sie denen ‚abzulesen‘?
Meine Studie schlägt eine Antwort auf solche Fragen vor, indem sie die Rolle(n) von Frauen bei zwei italienischen Einrichtungen analysiert. Die erste Einrichtung ist das heute als „Stiftung S. Giuseppe Onlus“ bekannte, in Rimini wirkende „Institut S. Giuseppe für Mutter- und Kinderhilfe“ mit dazugehöriger Kinderklinik „Ospedalino Regina Elena“. Diese Einrichtung hatte ab dem Anfang des 19. Jahrhunderts im regionalen und nationalen Kontext eine Schlüsselrolle beim Schutz von als illegitim begriffenen Mutterschaften und Kindern. Dieses Phänomen außerehelicher Mütter und Kinder wurde jahrhundertelang in Italien als soziokulturelle Plage empfunden. Die zweite Einrichtung ist ein ebenfalls in Rimini wirkendes großes, familiengeführtes Multi-Utility Unternehmen (SGR Group), das ins Ausland (Bulgarien) expandiert ist, und dessen vom Nachhaltigkeitsprinzip bestimmter Werdegang seit Jahren vom Weitblick einer weiblichen Präsidentin vorangetrieben wird.
Die Analyse soll das sozial innovative Frauenpotential, insbesondere auf der Ebene von Management und Führung, sowie die durch Frauen bewirkten ‚stillen‘ Erneuerungsprozesse innerhalb von Einrichtungen erläutern. Damit soll auch ein Beitrag geboten werden, um einem Forschungsdesiderat nachzukommen: der ‚stillen‘ Rolle der Frauen beim Aufbau und der Unterstützung von CSR und Nachhaltigkeit, sowie zur damit zusammenhängenden territorialen Entwicklung in Italien und in Europa.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Other women’s roles included: the female personnel responsible for various services, women and young mothers belonging to the local community, who freely offered their services (covering a dual role as former users and collaborators), the assisted women and the trained and monitored wet nurses.
The Group includes SGR reti, Utilia, SGR Servizi and CityGas, the Bulgarian company controlled by SGR which was joined by Technoterm in 2010.
To respond to and contemporise the stakeholders’ interests, SGR proceeded with their analysis, followed by the stakeholders’ engagement plan, which includes diverse tools of dialogue, consultation and communication. Mention can be made of Intranet, accessible at all corporate levels; an internal blog; a newsletter; employee satisfaction questionnaires; informative brochures; company notice boards; plenary meetings (once or twice a year) and monthly meetings.
We can cite projects for kindergartens, elementary and middle children which involved more than 5000 students aimed at educating to eco-energy, nutrition, civic sense, the creative and artistic development.
References
Atkinson P, Coffey A (1997) Analysing documentary realities. In: Silverman D (ed) Qualitative research. SAGE, London, pp 45–62
Baldarelli MG (2013) Account(ing)-ability and “charisma”: conceptual network and implementation. Ekonomska Istrazivanja-Economic Research. Special Issue: The 6th International Conference “The Changing Economic Landscape: Issues, Implications and Policy Options”. May 30th–June 1st 2013, S 63–82
Baldarelli MG, Del Baldo M (2013) The question of pendulum between entrepreneurship and managerialism: new challenges in theory and in practice. Ideas Ideals 4(18):63–74
Baldarelli MG, Del Baldo M (2016) Accounting and charity, How to read the “pink” in accounting in the first half of the twentieth century to a real life case. Special Issue: accounting and charities in historical perspective. Account Hist 21(2–3):144–166
Baldarelli MG, Gigli S (2014) Exploring the drivers of corporate reputation integrated with a corporate responsibility perspective: some reflections in theory and in praxis. J Manag Gov 18(2):589–613. doi:10.1007/s10997-011-9192-3
Baldarelli MG, Nesheva-Kioseva N (2011) Social and environmental accounting and reporting institutional factors: comparative analysis Bulgaria/Italy. In: Arena P, Cardillo E (eds) Social and environmental accounting research advances and new perspectives. Aracne, Rome, pp 63–137
Baldarelli MG, Del Baldo M, Nesheva-Kiosseva N (2014) Implementing Sustainability reporting (SR): (Neo-) institutional theory insights in the analysis of the SGR group, Italy and citygas, Bulgaria. J Mod Account Auditing 10(11):1067–1104
Barker PC, Monks K (1998) Irish women accountants and career progression: a research note. Account Organ Soc 23(8):813–823
Bass BM, Bass R (2008) The bass handbook of leadership: theory, research, & managerial applications. Free Press, New York
Bebbington J, Unerman J, O’Dwyer B (2009) Sustainability accounting and accountability. Routledge, London
Bell M (2013) Charismatic leadership case study with Ronald Reagan as exemplar. Emerg Leadersh Journeys 6(1):66–74
Broadbent J (2015) A gender agenda. Paper for the SIDREA International Workshop Meditari Accountancy Research European Conference, University of Bologna, Forlì, 2–3 July 2015, pp 1–14
Bruni L, Sena B (eds) (2013) The charismatic principle in social life. Routledge, New York
Bruni L, Smerilli A (2014) L’altra metà dell’ Economia. Città Nuova, Rome
Campolattano A, Mele C (2007) Rimini tra ’800 e ’900. La pubblica assistenza e beneficenza e il contributo delle Figlie della Carità. Quad ASRI 100:1–40
Catturi G (2007) La “valorialità” aziendale (“Values implementation” in the company). Cedam, Padova
Chapman CS, Cooper DJ, Miller PB (2009) Linking accounting, organizations and institutions. In: Chapman CS, Cooper DJ, Miller PB (eds) Accounting, organizations, & institutions. Essays in honour of Anthony Hopwood. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–29
Chiadini A, Freddi P (2008 and 2009) La storia di un valore. L’Istituto San Giuseppe per l’Aiuto Materno e Infantile di Rimini. Dagli inizi del Novecento agli anni Trenta, volume primo; Dagli anni Quaranta agli anni Settanta, volume secondo. FaraEditore: Rimini.
Choi J (2006) A motivational theory of charismatic leadership: envisioning, empathy and empowerment. J Leadersh Organ Stud 13(1):24–43
Ciancanelli P, Gallhofere S, Humphrey C, Kirkham L (1990) Gender and accountancy: some evidence from the UK. Crit Perspect Account 1(2):117–144
Contrafatto M (2011) Social and environmental accounting and engagement research: reflections on the state of the art and nee research avenues. Econ Aziend Online 2(3):273–289
Cooper C (1992) The non and nom of accounting for (M)other nature. Account Auditing Account J 5(3):16–39
Del Baldo M (2010) Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: toward a ‘territorial’ model based on small ‘champions’ of CSR. Int J Sustain Soc 2(3):215–247
Del Piano A (1927) L’Opera dell’Aiuto Materno in Rimini dal 1910 al 1926. Tipografia Giuseppe Benzi, Rimini (Relazione Sanitaria del Dott. Prof. Del Piano)
Eu-Commission (2012) Social innovation. http://ec.europea.eu/enterprise/policies/Innovation/policy/social-Innovation/index_en.htm. Accessed 11 February 2015
Gray RH, Dey C, Owen D, Evans R, Zadek S (1997) Struggling with the praxis of social accounting: stakeholders, accountability, audits and procedures. Account Auditing Account J 10(3):325–364
Haniffa RM, Cooke TE (2005) The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. J Account Public Policy 24(5):391–430
Haynes K (2008a) Transforming identities: accounting professionals and the transition to motherhood. Crit Perspect Account 19:620–642
Haynes K (2008b) (Re)figuring accounting and maternal bodies: the gendered embodiment of accounting professionals. Account Organ Soc 33(4–5):328–348
Hofstede G (1991) Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. McGraw-Hill, New York
Hopwood AG (1987) Accounting and gender: an introduction. Account Organ Soc 12(1):65–69
Jamali D, Saffieddine AM, Rabbath M (2008) Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corp Gov 16:443–459
Kirkham LM (1992) Integrating herstory and history in accountancy. Account Organ Soc 17(3–4):87–297
Krüger P (2009) Corporate social responsibility and the board of directors. Job market paper. Toulouse School of Economics, Toulouse
Light PC (2006) Reshaping social entrepreneurship. Stanf Soc Innov Rev 4(3):46–51
Maak T, Pless N (2006) Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society: a relational perspective. J Bus Ethics 66(1):99–115
Maltby J, Rutterford J (2006) ‘she possessed her own fortune’: women investors from the late nineteenth century to the early twentieth century. Bus Hist 48(2):220–253
McKernan JF, Kosmala K (2007) Doing the truth: religion – deconstruction – justice and accounting. Account Auditing Account J 20(5):729–764
Meindl JR (1990) On leadership: an alternative to the conventional. In: Straw BM, Cummings LL (eds) Research in organizational behavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 159–203
Miller TL, Grimes M, McMullen J, Vogus TJ (2012) Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Acad Manag Rev 37(4):616–640
Molteni M (2009) Aziende a movente ideale. In: Bruni L, Zamagni S (eds) Dizionario di Economia Civile. Città Nuova, Rome
Naumes W, Naumes MJ (2006) The art and craft of case writing, 2nd edn. M. E. Sharpe, London
Nicholls A, Murdock A (2012) The nature of social innovation. In: Nicholls A, Murdock A (eds) Social innovation: blurring boundaries to reconfigure markets. Palgrave Macmillan, London
Olsen, OK (2010) Are good leaders moral leaders? The relationship between effective military operational leadership and morals’. Dissertation for the philosophiae doctor degree (PhD) at the University of Bergen
Osburg T, Schmidpeter R (2013) Social innovation: solutions for a sustainable future. CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance series. Springer, London
O’Brien DJ (2013) The charismatic principle in an american and democratic context. In: Bruni L, Sena B (eds) The charismatic principle in social life. Routledge, New York, pp 37–46
Palshikar K (2007) Charismatic leadership. http://www.unc.edu/~ketan/documents/Charismatic%20Leadership.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2015
Rao K, Tilt C (2015) Board composition and corporate social responsibility: the role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making. J Bus Ethics 138(2):327–347. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2613-5
Rhode DL, Kellerman B (eds) (2007) Women and leadership: the state of play and strategies for change. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Rimondini G (2009) Gruppo Società Gas Rimini. 1959–2009, Cinquantesimo anniversario dall’inizio dell’erogazione del gas. Società Gas Rimini, Rimini
Rose C (2007) Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corp Gov 15(2):404–413
SGR President (2013) Interview
Shackleton K (1999) Gender segregation in Scottish chartered accountancy; the deployment of male concerns about the admission of women 1900–25. Account Bus Financial Hist 9(1):135–156
Spence C, Gray R (2008) Social and environmental reporting and the business case. ACCA, London
Stein E (1996) Essays on woman, 2nd edn. ICS Publications, Washington DC
Tilt C (2015) Gender diversity on corporate boards and CSR. Paper for the SIDREA International Workshop Meditari Accountancy Research European Conference 2015, University of Bologna, Forlì, 2–3 July 2015, pp 1–19
Walker B, Salt D (2006) Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press, Washington DC
Walker SP (2006) Philanthropic women and accounting. Octavia Hill and the exercise of ‘quiet power and sympathy. Account Bus Financial Hist 16(2):163–194
Weber M (1947) The theory of social and economic organization. The Free Press of Glencoe, Collier-Macmillan Limited, London (Copyright 1947 by Oxford University Press, New York, Inc. printed in the USA. First Free Press Paperback Edition 1964)
Wiskin C (2006) Businesswomen and financial management: three eighteenth-century case studies. Account Bus Financial Hist 16(2):143–161
Yin RK (1994) Case study research: design and methods, 2nd edn. SAGE, Newbury Park
Yukl GA (2010) Leadership in organizations, 7th edn. Prentice-Hall, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This paper represents the work of a common research project. However, Baldarelli Maria-Gabriella wrote Sect. 4 and 5 while Del Baldo Mara wrote Sect. 1, 2 and 3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baldarelli, MG., Del Baldo, M. Ethics, gift and social innovation through CSR and female leadership in business administration in Italy. uwf 24, 141–150 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-016-0413-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-016-0413-8
Keywords
- Leadership
- Women
- Social innovation
- Business administration
- CSR (corporate social responsibility)
- Sustainability