Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of failed facemask ventilation: new scoring system for difficult airway

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 21 May 2020

Abstract

Background

We previously have shown that there was a strong correlation between failed facemask ventilation, failed ventilation through a supraglottic airway, and difficult tracheal intubation. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether or not an established method to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway was also useful for predicting failed facemask ventilation.

Methods

This was a single-center, retrospective observational study. We studied 28,081 anesthetized patients in whom ventilation through a facemask, and supraglottic airway was attempted as the initial technique during induction of anesthesia, between May 2011 and March 2016. For each patient, the score which had been validated to be useful for predicting difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway was calculated. The score ranged between 0 and 7 points, and we defined a low risk when the score was 0–3, and a high risk when the score was 4–7. To measure and compare the predictive accuracy of the score, we generated a receiver operating characteristic curve and compared the area under the curve (AUC).

Results

The incidence of failed facemask ventilation was significantly higher in patients with high-risk predictive score than in patients with low-risk predictive score [0.38% vs 0.056%, odds ratio 6.8 (95% CI 2.6–18.1, p value = 0.002)], and the sensitivity of the score was 25%, while the specificity was 95%, with a negative predictive value of 99%. The AUC of the score was 0.71 (95% CI 0.58–0.83).

Conclusions

The predictive score for difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway is also useful to predict failed facemask ventilation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Blitt CD, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Benumof JL, Berry FA, Blitt CD, Bode RH, Cheney FW, Connis RT, Guidry OF, Nickinovich DG, American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Ovassapian A Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:251–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, Mendonca C, Bhagrath R, Patel A, O'Sullivan EP, Woodall NM, Ahmad I, Difficult Airway Society Intubation Guidelines Working Group. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115:827–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C. Major complication of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:617–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. JSA airway management guideline 2014: to improve the safety of induction of anesthesia. J Anesth. 2014;28:482–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yildiz TS, Solak M, Toker K. The incidence and risk factors of difficult mask ventilation. J Anesth. 2005;19:7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kheterpal S, Han R, Tremper KK, Shanks A, Tait AR, O’Reilly M, Ludwig TA. Incidence and predictors of difficult and impossible mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:885–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kheterpal S, Martin L, Shanks AM, Tremper KK. Prediction of impossible mask ventilation: a review of 50,000 anesthetics. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:891–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. El-Orbany M, Woehick HJ. Difficult mask ventilation. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:1870–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Asai T, Morris S. The laryngeal mask airway: its feature, effects and role. Can J Anaesth. 1994;41:930–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramachandran SK, Mathis MR, Tremper KK, Shanks AM, Kheterpal S. Predictors and clinical outcomes from failed Laryngeal Mask Airway UniqueTM: a study of 15,795 patients. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:1217–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saito T, Liu W, Chew ST, Ti LK. Incidence of and risk factors for difficult ventilation via a supraglottic airway device in a population of 14,480 patients from South-East Asia. Anaesthesia. 2015;70:1079–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Saito T, Chew ST, Liu WL, Thinn KK, Asai T, Ti LK. A proposal for a new scoring system to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117(Suppl 1):i83–i86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saito T, Asai T, Taguchi A, Chew ST, Liu WL, Thinn KK, Ti LK. Correlation between failed facemask ventilation, failed ventilation through a supraglottic airway and difficult tracheal intubation in unanticipated difficult airways: an observational study. J Clin Anesth. 2020;60:34–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saito T, Wong ZW, Thinn KK, Poon KH, Liu E. Review of critical incidents in a university department of anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015;43:238–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science (New York NY). 1988;240:1285–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yentis SM. Predicting difficult tracheal intubation: worthwhile exercise or pointless ritual? Anaesthesia. 2002;57:105–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Asai T. Complications with supraglottic airways: something to worry about or much ado about nothing? Anesthesiology. 2012;116:1183–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Asai T. Strategies for difficult airway management—the current state is not ideal. J Anesth. 2013;27:157–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Asai T. Progress in difficult airway management. J Anesth. 2017;31:483–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of the Department of Anesthesia, National University Health System and Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, for their contribution to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoyuki Saito.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saito, T., Asai, T., Taguchi, A. et al. Prediction of failed facemask ventilation: new scoring system for difficult airway. J Anesth 34, 367–372 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-020-02761-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-020-02761-3

Keywords

Navigation