Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Finer gauge of cutting but not pencil-point needles correlate with lower incidence of post-dural puncture headache: a meta-regression analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a well-known neurological outcome caused by leakage of cerebrospinal fluid during neuraxial anesthesia. Studies aimed at assessing the efficacy of finer gauged spinal needles to reduce the incidence of PDPH have produced conflicting results. We have therefore examined the effect of the gauge of cutting needles and pencil-point needles, separately, on the incidence of PDPH.

Methods

The PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases were searched for randomized studies which compared PDPH incidence in a head-to-head analysis of individual needle gauges of similar needle designs (cutting and pencil-point). A meta-regression analysis was performed taking into account various covariates, such as needle gauge and design, mean age of patient population, surgery type, percentage of males and females in study population and year of publication.

Results

Of the 22 studies (n = 5631) included in the analysis, 12 (n = 3148) and ten (n = 2483) compared different gauges of cutting needles and pencil-point needles, respectively. After adjusting for covariates, meta-regression analysis was performed for all studies that randomly compared individual needle gauges of similar needle design. Whereas the incidence of PDPH inversely correlated with gauge in cutting needles (β = −1.36 % per gauge, P = 0.037), no relationship was noted in pencil-point needles (β = −0.32 % per gauge, P = 0.114). Female gender was the only covariate that reached a statistically significant correlation with the incidence of PDPH in both models.

Conclusions

A significant relationship between needle gauge and subsequent rate of PDPH was noted in cutting needles, but not pencil-point needles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Power I, McCormack JG, Myles PS. Regional anaesthesia and pain management. Anaesthesia. 2010;65[Suppl 1]:38–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kettner SC, Willschke H, Marhofer P. Does regional anaesthesia really improve outcome? Br J Anaesth. 2011;107[Suppl 1]:i90–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, Sage D, Futter M, Saville G, Clark T, MacMahon S. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ. 2000;321:1493.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Choi PT, Galinski SE, Takeuchi L, Lucas S, Tamayo C, Jadad AR. PDPH is a common complication of neuraxial blockade in parturients: a meta-analysis of obstetrical studies. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50:460–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Douglas MJ, Ward ME, Campbell DC, Bright SB, Merrick PM. Factors involved in the incidence of post-dural puncture headache with the 25 gauge Whitacre needle for obstetric anesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1997;6:220–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rukewe A, Adebayo OK, Fatiregun AA. Failed obstetric spinal anesthesia in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital: incidence and risk factors. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:1301–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chaudhry WI, Saleem S, Naaman K, Waseem H, Javaid A, Waseem MB. Comparison of 22, 23 and 25 gauge quincke needles for post dural puncture headache and identification of other significant factors for PDPH in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Proc Shaikh Zayed Postgraduate Medical Institute. 2009;23:55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Corbey MP, Berg P, Quaynor H. Classification and severity of postdural puncture headache. Comparison of 26-gauge and 27-gauge Quincke needle for spinal anaesthesia in day-care surgery in patients under 45 years. Anaesthesia. 1993;48:776–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hafer J, Rupp D, Wollbruck M, Engel J, Hempelmann G. The effect of needle type and immobilization on postspinal headache. Anaesthesist. 1997;46:860–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hwang JJ, Ho ST, Wang JJ, Liu HS. Post dural puncture headache in cesarean section: comparison of 25-gauge Whitacre with 25- and 26-gauge Quincke needles. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 1997;35:33–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang SB, Goodnough DE, Lee YK, Olson RA, Borshoff JA, Furlano MM, Krueger LS. Comparison of 26- and 27-G needles for spinal anesthesia for ambulatory surgery patients. Anesthesiology. 1992;76:734–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim M, Yoon H. Comparison of post-dural puncture headache and low back pain between 23 and 25 gauge Quincke spinal needles in patients over 60 years: randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48:1315–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmittner MD, Terboven T, Dluzak M, Janke A, Limmer ME, Weiss C, Bussen DG, Burmeister MA, Beck GC. High incidence of post-dural puncture headache in patients with spinal saddle block induced with Quincke needles for anorectal surgery: a randomised clinical trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010;25:775–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shah VR, Bhosale GP. Spinal anaesthesia in young patients: evaluation of needle gauge and design on technical problems and postdural puncture headache. S Afr J Anaesth Analg. 2010;16:24–8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shaikh JM, Memon A, Memon MA, Khan M. Post dural puncture headache after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a comparison of 25 g Quincke, 27 g Quincke and 27 g Whitacre spinal needles. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008;20:10–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Srivastava V, Jindal P, Sharma JP. Study of post dural puncture headache with 27G Quincke & Whitacre needles in obstetrics/non obstetrics patients. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2010;20:709–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tarkkila P, Huhtala J, Salminen U. Difficulties in spinal needle use. Insertion characteristics and failure rates associated with 25-, 27- and 29-gauge Quincke-type spinal needles. Anaesthesia. 1994;49:723–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vallejo MC, Mandell GL, Sabo DP, Ramanathan S. Postdural puncture headache: a randomized comparison of five spinal needles in obstetric patients. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:916–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wadood R, Tariq A. Post dural puncture headache; comparison of 25 and 27 G spinal needles in urological patients. Khyber J Med Sci. 2014;7:40–3.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Campbell DC, Douglas MJ, Pavy TJ, Merrick P, Flanagan ML, McMorland GH. Comparison of the 25-gauge Whitacre with the 24-gauge Sprotte spinal needle for elective caesarean section: cost implications. Can J Anaesth. 1993;40:1131–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fama F, Linard C, Bierlaire D, Gioffre’-Florio M, Fusciardi J, Laffon M. Influence of needle diameter on spinal anaesthesia puncture failures for caesarean section: a prospective, randomised, experimental study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2015;34:277–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hopkinson JM, Samaan AK, Russell IF, Birks RJ, Patrick MR. A comparative multicentre trial of spinal needles for caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 1997;52:1005–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pittoni G, Toffoletto F, Calcarella G, Zanette G, Giron GP. Spinal anesthesia in outpatient knee surgery: 22-gauge versus 25-gauge Sprotte needle. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:73–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sears DH, Leeman MI, Jassy LJ, O’Donnell LA, Allen SG, Reisner LS. The frequency of postdural puncture headache in obstetric patients: a prospective study comparing the 24-gauge versus the 22-gauge Sprotte needle. J Clin Anesth. 1994;6:42–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shutt LE, Valentine SJ, Wee MY, Page RJ, Prosser A, Thomas TA. Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: comparison of 22-gauge and 25-gauge Whitacre needles with 26-gauge Quincke needles. Br J Anaesth. 1992;69:589–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith EA, Thorburn J, Duckworth RA, Reid JA. A comparison of 25 G and 27 G Whitacre needles for caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 1994;49:859–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Eriksson AL, Hallen B, Lagerkranser M, Persson E, Skoldefors E. Whitacre or Quincke needles—does it really matter. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1998;113:17–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hart JR, Whitacre RJ. Pencil-point needle in prevention of postspinal headache. J Am Med Assoc. 1951;147:657–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Holst D, Mollmann M, Ebel C, Hausman R, Wendt M. In vitro investigation of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after dural puncture with various spinal needles. Anesth Analg. 1998;87:1331–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nafiu OO, Salam RA, Elegbe EO. Post dural puncture headache in obstetric patients: experience from a West African teaching hospital. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007;16:4–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Halpern S, Preston R. Postdural puncture headache and spinal needle design. Metaanalyses. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:1376–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Turnbull DK, Shepherd DB. Post-dural puncture headache: pathogenesis, prevention and treatment. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:718–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Flaatten H, Rodt SA, Vamnes J, Rosland J, Wisborg T, Koller ME. Postdural puncture headache. A comparison between 26- and 29-gauge needles in young patients. Anaesthesia. 1989;44:147–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lim M, Cross GD, Sold M. Postspinal headache. A comparison of the 24G Sprotte syringe and a 29G Quincke needle. Anaesthesist. 1992;41:539–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Van de Velde M, Schepers R, Berends N, Vandermeersch E, De Buck F. Ten years of experience with accidental dural puncture and post-dural puncture headache in a tertiary obstetric anaesthesia department. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2008;17:329–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lybecker H, Møller JT, May O, Nielsen HK. Incidence and prediction of postdural puncture headache. A prospective study of 1021 spinal anesthesias. Anesth Analg. 1990;70:389–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Naulty JS, Hertwig L, Hunt CO, Datta S, Ostheimer GW, Weiss JB. Influence of local anesthetic solution on postdural puncture headache. Anesthesiology. 1990;72:450–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Harbord RM, Higgins JPT. Meta-regression in Stata. Meta. 2008;8:493–519.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Peralta F, Higgins N, Lange E, Wong CA, McCarthy RJ. The relationship of body mass index with the incidence of postdural puncture headache in parturients. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:451–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Seeberger MD, Kaufmann M, Staender S, Schneider M, Scheidegger D. Repeated dural punctures increase the incidence of postdural puncture headache. Anesth Analg. 1996;82:302–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hatfalvi BI. Postulated mechanisms for postdural puncture headache and review of laboratory models. Clinical experience. Reg Anesth. 1995;20:329–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Miu M, Paech MJ, Nathan E. The relationship between body mass index and post-dural puncture headache in obstetric patients. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014;23:371–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Thompson SG, Higgins JP. How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Stat Med. 2002;21:1559–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1800 Orleans Street, Sheikh Zayed Tower 3014C, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA

    Andres Zorrilla-Vaca & Ryan Healy

  2. Faculty of Health, Universidad Libre, Cali, Colombia

    Andres Zorrilla-Vaca & Carolina Zorrilla-Vaca

Authors
  1. Andres Zorrilla-Vaca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ryan Healy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carolina Zorrilla-Vaca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andres Zorrilla-Vaca.

Ethics declarations

Funding

None.

Disclosures

Andres Zorrilla-Vaca receives research support by the Colombian Society of Anesthesiology and Reanimation.

Conflict of interest

None.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zorrilla-Vaca, A., Healy, R. & Zorrilla-Vaca, C. Finer gauge of cutting but not pencil-point needles correlate with lower incidence of post-dural puncture headache: a meta-regression analysis. J Anesth 30, 855–863 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-016-2221-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-016-2221-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation