Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic, relapsed, or inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate changes in health related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with metastatic head and neck (H&N) cancer randomized to receive metronomic (methotrexate and celecoxib) or cisplatin chemotherapy.

Methods

Patients older than 18 years, with a Karnofsky Performance score of ≥70, and diagnosed with metastatic, locally advanced inoperable or recurrent head and neck (H&N) cancer not amenable to surgery or radiation were randomized (1:1) to receive metronomic or cisplatin chemotherapy. All patients were recruited from the Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. In addition to demographic and baseline clinical characteristics, patients were asked to rate their HRQoL using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires (Indian versions) at baseline and at the end of each chemo cycle (every 3 weeks) till the end of study or early termination.

Results

Of the 110 patients screened, 87 agreed to participate in the study. Mean age of the study population was 47.5 years (S.D. ±10.04) for the metronomic group and 47.2 years (S.D. ±9.89) for the cisplatin group. Overall quality of life was not significantly different between the two treatment groups from baseline to end of treatment. However, there was a statistically significant improvement in Pain QLQ-C30 score from baseline to week 3 (OR = 3.14, p = 0.036) and week 6 (OR = 3.33, p = 0.034) in the metronomic arm compared with the cisplatin arm.

Conclusion

In addition to improvements in survival, understanding the impact of treatment options on changes in HRQoL is important as it can aid physicians in making treatment and rehabilitation decisions for patients with advanced inoperable H&N cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. List M, Stracks J (2000) Evaluation of quality of life in patients definitively treated for squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. Curr Opin Oncol 12:215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Murphy BA, Ridner S, Wells N et al (2007) Quality of life research in head and neck cancer: a review of the current state of the science. Crit Rev Oncol/Hematol 62:251–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Amdur R, Parsons J, Mendenhall W et al (1989) Postoperative irradiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: an analysis of treatment results and complications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 16:25–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gritz ER, Hoffman A (1996) Behavioral and psychological issues in head and neck cancer. In: Beumer J, Curtis T, Marunick M (eds) Maxillofacial rehabilitation: prosthodontic and surgical considerations. Ishiyaku Euromica. 1–14

  5. Brockstein BE (2011) Management of recurrent head and neck cancer: recent progress and future directions. Drugs 71(12):1551–1559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Rivera F et al (2008) Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 359:1116–1127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ignacio DN, Griffin JJ, Daniel MG et al (2013) An evaluation of treatment strategies for head and neck cancer in an African American population. West Indian Med J 62(6):504–509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Molina MA, Cheung MC, Perez EA et al (2008) African American and poor patients have a dramatically worse prognosis for head and neck cancer: an examination of 20,915 patients. Cancer 113(10):2797–2806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goss PE, Strasser-Weippl K, Lee-Bychkovsky BL et al (2014) Challenges to effective cancer control in China, India, and Russia. Lancet Oncol 15(5):489–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Patil V, Noronha V, Krishna V et al (2013) Oral metronomic chemotherapy in recurrent, metastatic and locally advanced head and neck cancers. Clin Oncol R Coll Radiol G B 25(6):388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Patil V, Noronha V, D’cruz AK et al (2012) Metronomic chemotherapy in advanced oral cancers. J Cancer Res Ther 8(Suppl 1):S106–110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gluck S, Lau H, Mackinnon J et al (2005) Metronomic therapy in recurrent and metastatic chemoresistant SCCHN: data from a pilot study. Biomed Pharmacother 59:S319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Velikova G, Booth L, Smith A et al (2004) Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 22:714–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Patil V, Noronha V, Joshi A et al (2015) A prospective randomized phase II study comparing metronomic chemotherapy with chemotherapy (single agent cisplatin), in patients with metastatic, relapsed or inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of head neck. Oral Oncol

  15. Andre T, Boni C, Mounedji-Boudiaf L et al (2004) Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2343–2351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B et al (2005) Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:1659–1672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC et al (2006) Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 355:2542–2550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Escudier B, Eisen T, Stadler WM et al (2007) Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356:125–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wong YN, Egleston BL, Sachdeva K et al (2013) Cancer patients’ trade-offs among efficacy, toxicity, and out-of-pocket cost in the curative and noncurative setting. Med Care 51(9):838–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This was an investigator initiated study and was funded by Intramural Grant from Tata Memorial Hospital.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Statement of human rights

The studies have been approved by the appropriate institutional ethics committee and have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Confirmation

This is to confirm that paper submitted to Value in Health journal is just the abstract and not the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kumar Prabhash.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noronha, V., Joshi, A., Marfatia, S. et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic, relapsed, or inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in India. Support Care Cancer 24, 1595–1602 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2937-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2937-9

Keywords

Navigation