Skip to main content
Log in

Catheter-associated bloodstream infections and thrombotic risk in hematologic patients with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) as an alternative to other central venous access devices (CVAD) is becoming very frequent in cancer patients. To evaluate the impact of complications associated to these devices in patients with hematologic malignancies, we revised the catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) and the catheter-related thrombotic complications (CRTC) observed at our institute between January 2009 and December 2012.

Methods

A total of 612 PICCs were inserted into 483 patients at diagnosis or in subsequent phases of their hematologic disease. PICCs were successfully inserted in all cases. The median duration of in situ PICC placement was 101 days (interquartile range, 48–184 days).

Results

A CRBSI occurred in 47 cases (7.7 %), with a rate of 0.59 per 1000 PICC days. A CRTC was recorded in 16 cases (2.6 %), with a rate of 0.20 per 1000 PICC days. No serious complication was associated to these events. Cox regression analyses of variables associated to CRBSIs and to CRTCs showed that only the type of disease (acute leukemia compared to other diseases) was significantly associated to a higher incidence of CRBSIs, while no feature was predictive for a higher risk of CRTCs.

Conclusions

PICCs represent a useful and safe alternative to conventional CVAD for the management of patients with hematologic malignancies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yildizeli B, Lacin T, Batirel HF, Yuksel M (2004) Complications and management of long-term central venous access catheters and ports. J Vasc Access 5:174–178

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Polak JF, Anderson D, Hagspiel K, Mungovan J (1998) Peripherally inserted central venous catheters: factors affecting patient satisfaction. Am J Roentgenol 170:1609–1611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cortelezzi A, Fracchiolla NS, Maisonneuve P, Moia M, Luchesini C, Ranzi ML et al (2003) Central venous catheter-related complications in patients with hematological malignancies: a retrospective analysis of risk factors and prophylactic measures. Leuk Lymphoma 44:1495–1501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Worth LJ, Seymour JF, Slavin MA (2009) Infective and thrombotic complications of central venous catheters in patients with hematological malignancy: prospective evaluation of nontunneled devices. Support Care Cancer 17:811–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. United States (2011) Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections

  6. Bellesi S, Chiusolo P, De Pascale G, Pittiruti M, Scoppettuolo G, Metafuni E et al (2013) Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in the management of oncohematological patients submitted to autologous stem cell transplantation. Support Care Cancer 21:531–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wisplinghoff H, Cornely OA, Moser S et al (2003) Outcomes of nosocomial bloodstream infections in adult neutropenic patients: a prospective cohort and matched case-control study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 12:905–911, 24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ (2006) The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc 81:1159–1171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Safdar N, Maki DG (2005) Risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with peripherally inserted central venous catheters used in hospitalized patients. Chest 128:489–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Strahilevitz J, Lossos IS, Verstandig A, Sasson T, Kori Y, Gillis S (2001) Vascular access via peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs): experience in 40 patients with acute myeloid leukemia at a single institute. Leuk Lymphoma 40:365–371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kabsy Y, Baudin G, Vinti H, Novellas S, Mannone L, Chevallier P et al (2010) Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) in onco-hematology. PICC line in onco-hematology. Bull Cancer 97:1067–1071

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mollee P, Jones M, Stackelroth J, van Kuilenburg R, Joubert W, Faoagali J et al (2011) Catheter-associated bloodstream infection incidence and risk factors in adults with cancer: a prospective cohort study. J Hosp Infect 78:26–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morano SG, Coppola L, Latagliata R, Berneschi P, Chistolini A, Micozzi A et al (2014) Early and late complications related to central venous catheters in hematological malignancies: a retrospective analysis of 1102 patients. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis 14:6

    Google Scholar 

  14. Linder LE, Curelaru I, Gustavsson B et al (1984) Material thrombogenicity in central venous catheterization: a comparison between soft, antebrachial catheters of silicone elastomer and polyurethane. J Parente Enteral Nutr 8:399–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Curelaru I, Gustavsson B, Hansson AH et al (1983) Material thrombogenicity in central venous catheterization II. A comparison between plain silicone elastomer, and plain polyethylene, long, antebrachial catheters. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 27:158–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Allen AW, Megargell JL, Brown DB et al (2000) Venous thrombosis associated with the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11:1309–1314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gong P, Huang XE, Chen CY, Liu JH, Meng AF, Feng JF (2012) Comparison of complications of peripherally inserted central catheters with ultrasound guidance or conventional methods in cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 13:1873–1875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chopra V, Anand S, Hickner A, Buist M, Rogers MA, Saint S et al (2013) Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 382:311–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leung TK, Lee CM, Tai CJ, Liang YL, Lin CC (2011) A retrospective study on the long-term placement of peripherally inserted central catheters and the importance of nursing care and education. Cancer Nurs 34:E25–E30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ngo A, Murphy S (2005) A Theory-based intervention to improve nurses’ knowledge, self-efficacy, and skills to reduce PICC occlusion. J Infus Nurs 28:173–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest to report for any author of the manuscript entitled “Catheter-Associated Bloodstream Infections and Thrombosis Risk in Hematologic Patients with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICC)” submitted for publication in the Journal of Supportive Care in Cancer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salvatore Giacomo Morano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morano, S.G., Latagliata, R., Girmenia, C. et al. Catheter-associated bloodstream infections and thrombotic risk in hematologic patients with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC). Support Care Cancer 23, 3289–3295 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2740-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2740-7

Keywords

Navigation