Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Short-term pacemaker dependency after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

  • original article
  • Published:
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a less invasive technique for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients. Occurrence of conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after TAVI is frequently observed.

Methods

The retrospective analysis comprised 153 patients (96 women, aged from 65 to 97 years) who underwent TAVI due to high-grade aortic stenosis. The aim was to evaluate the incidence of high-grade atrioventricular (AV) block after TAVI and the percentage of ventricular pacing and pacemaker (PM)-dependency at the first follow-up 6–8 weeks after implantation.

Results

Out of the 153 patients (age 81 ± 6 years) who underwent TAVI, 144 (94 %) had a transfemoral and 9 (6 %) patients a transapical approach. A PPM was implanted in 31 (20 %) patients, 24 (16 %) were implanted with the Medtronic CoreValve® and 7 (5 %) with the Edwards Sapien® valve (p = n.s.). Complete AV block was the indication in 21 patients (68 %), second-degree AV block in 1 patient (3 %), slow atrial fibrillation in 3 patients (10 %), new left bundle branch block (LBBB) plus sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 1 patient (3 %), sick sinus syndrome in 2 patients (7 %), whereas in 3 patients (10 %) a PPM was inserted for safety reasons because of new LBBB and first-grade AV block. All of the nine patients (6 %) with a preexisting bundle branch block developed total AV block after TAVI. At follow-up PM-dependency (intrinsic rhythm < 30 bpm) occurred in 11/30 patients (37 %), whereas an intrinsic rhythm > 50 bpm was seen in 17 patients (57 %). At nominal device programming the percentage of ventricular stimulation (VP) during the short-term observation period was 60 ± 44 % in dual-chamber devices (N = 18), and 70 ± 36 % in single-chamber PPM (N = 5).

Conclusion

The PPM implantation rate of about 20 % after TAVI is comparable to previously published data. The need for permanent pacing is linked to the valve type and preexistence of a right bundle branch block. At short-term more than half of the patients implanted with a device were not strictly PM-dependent, but presented an underlying intrinsic rhythm, indicating that temporary AV conduction disturbances may recover over time. This might justify a more conservative approach in some patients under watchful waiting. From another point of view, ventricular pacing at a regular or sensor-modulated rate may provide rhythm stability and chronotropy during the short-term period post-TAVI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nazif TM, Dizon JM, Hahn RT, et al. PARTNER Publications Office. Predictors and clinical outcomes of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the PARTNER (Placement of AoRtic TraNscathetER Valves) trial and registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(1 Pt A):60–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Urena M, Rodés-Cabau J. Permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: still a concern? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(1 Pt A):70–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Urena M, Webb JG, Tamburino C, et al. Permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact on late clinical outcomes and left ventricular function. Circulation. 2014;129(11):1233–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Laynez A, Ben-Dor I, Barbash IM, et al. Frequency of conduction disturbances after Edwards SAPIEN percutaneous valve implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110(8):1164–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schymik G, Heimeshoff M, Bramlage P, et al. A comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement in 1,141 patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and less than high risk. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015. doi:101002/ccd.25866.

  6. Ledwoch J, Franke J, Gerckens U, German Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions Registry Investigators, et al. Incidence and predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: analysis from the German transcatheter aortic valve interventions registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82(4):E569–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldenberg G, Kusniec J, Kadmon E, et al. Pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112(10):1632–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Erkapic D, De Rosa S, Kelava A, Lehmann R, Fichtlscherer S, Hohnloser SH. Risk for permanent pacemaker after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comprehensive analysis of the literature. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012;23(4):391–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagatomo T, Abe H, Kikuchi K, Nakashima Y. New onset of pacemaker dependency after permanent pacemaker implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004;27(4):475–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramazzina C, Knecht S, Jeger R, et al. Pacemaker implantation and need for ventricular pacing during follow-up after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37(12):1592–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Durand E, Eltchaninoff H, Canville A, et al. Feasibility and safety of early discharge after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the edwards SAPIEN-XT prosthesis. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(8):1116–22. pii: S0002-9149(15)00641-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Godin M, Eltchaninoff H, Furuta A, et al. Frequency of conduction disturbances after transcatheter implantation of an Edwards Sapien aortic valve prosthesis. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106(5):707–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Franzoni I, Latib A, Maisano F, et al. Comparison of incidence and predictors of left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the CoreValve versus the Edwards valve. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112(4):554–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Adams DH, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ, CoreValve Clinical Investigators, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(19):1790–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pereira E, Ferreira N, Caeiro D, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation and requirements of pacing over time. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013;36(5):559–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bax JJ, Delgado V, Bapat V, et al. Open issues in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Part 2: procedural issues and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(38):2639–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tzamtzis S, Viquerat J, Yap J, Mullen MJ, Burriesci G. Numerical analysis of the radial force produced by the Medtronic-CoreValve and Edwards-SAPIEN after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Med Eng Phys. 2013;35(1):125–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mouillet G, Lellouche N, Yamamoto M, Oguri A, Dubois-Rande JL, Van Belle E, Gilard M, Laskar M, Teiger E. Outcomes following pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve(®) devices: results from the FRANCE 2 Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015. doi:10.1002/ccd.25818.

  19. Urena M, Hayek S, Cheema AN, et al. Arrhythmia burden in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis as determined by continuous electrocardiographic recording: toward a better understanding of arrhythmic events after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2015;131(5):469–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Guetta V, Goldenberg G, Segev A, et al. Predictors and course of high-degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the CoreValve Revalving System. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108(11):1600–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van der Boon RM, Van Mieghem NM, Theuns DA, et al. Pacemaker dependency after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the self-expanding Medtronic CoreValve System. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(2):1269–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sundh F, Simlund J, Harrison JK, Hughes GC, Vavalle J, Maynard C, Strauss DG, Wagner GS, Ugander M. Incidence of strict versus nonstrict left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am Heart J. 2015;169(3):438–44. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2014.12.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, Heart Rhythm Society, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(3):e6–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria

    Christiana Schernthaner MD, Johannes Kraus MD, Franz Danmayr MD, Matthias Hammerer MD, Uta C. Hoppe MD & Bernhard Strohmer MD

  2. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria

    Jens Schneider MD

Authors
  1. Christiana Schernthaner MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Johannes Kraus MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Franz Danmayr MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matthias Hammerer MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jens Schneider MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Uta C. Hoppe MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bernhard Strohmer MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christiana Schernthaner MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no actual or potential conflicts of interest in relation to this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schernthaner, C., Kraus, J., Danmayr, F. et al. Short-term pacemaker dependency after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Wien Klin Wochenschr 128, 198–203 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-015-0906-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-015-0906-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation