Skip to main content
Log in

Patient’s and physician’s behavior on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia among the patients at the risk of clinical progression. A multicenter noninterventional trial in Slovakia by “Prostate and Expectations of Treatment: Epidemiology Research” (PETER) study group

  • original article
  • Published:
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Objectives

The aim of the survey was to assess physician’s behavior and the global knowledge about patient’s preferences and their psychological burden linked to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in an outpatient setting in Slovakia.

Methods

The study included 36 outpatient urological clinics. Overall, 1132 newly diagnosed LUTS patients were screened within 1 month. A total of 454 questionnaires were obtained from 459 LUTS patients with risk of progression (RP). Inclusion criteria were: age > 50 years, IPSS > 8, prostate volume ≥ 30 cm3, and PSA ≥ 1.5 to ≤ 10 ng/ml.

Results

The digital rectal examination, PSA testing, and urinalysis were used in all the centers as first visit examinations. The least frequently performed diagnostic procedure was uroflowmetry (74 %). The physician’s preferred therapy for patients with RP was standard combined treatment in (52.6 %); followed by α-blocker alone (45 %) and monotherapy with 5-α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARI) only in 3 % of all asked urologists. Patient’s mean age was 63.3 years (SD ±  7.4); baseline PSA value 2.2 ng/ml (SD + 3.2); prostate volume was 38.0 ml (SD ±  16.7 ml); Qmax was 11.5 ml/s (SD ±  4.6); and IPSS score 12.5 (SD ±  6.3). The most bothersome symptoms were nocturia (prevalence of ≥ 75 %), weak urinary stream (61 %), and retarded voiding (43 %). Patient’s expectations of treatment were rapid improvement of symptoms (36.0 %), stabilization of symptoms (35.5 %), and reduction of potential risk of surgical intervention (25.8 %).

Conclusions

Our research reflects the physician’s behavior, patient’s self-perception of the disease and therapeutic priorities in the current outpatient practice in Slovakia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Teillac P. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: patients perception of medical treatment and their expectations: results of French survey involving patients treated with finasteride. Therapie. 2002;57:473–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hong SJ1, Rayford W, Valiquette L, et al. The importance of patient perception in the clinical assessment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and its management. BJU Int. 2005;95(1):15–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaplan S, Naslund M. Public, patient, and professional attitudes towards the diagnosis and treatment of enlarged prostate: a landmark national US survey. Int J Clin Pract. 2006;60(10):1157–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Emberton M, Marberger M, Rosette Jdl. Understanding patient and physician perceptions of benign prostatic hyperplasia in Europe: the prostate research on behavior and education (PROBE) survey. Int J Clin Pract. 2007;62(1):18–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Emberton M. Medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: physician and patient preferences and satisfaction. Int J Clin Pract. 2010;64(10):1425–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Parsons JK, Wilt TJ, Wang PY, et al. Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Research Group. Progression of lower urinary tract symptoms in older men: a community based study. J Urol. 2010;183(5):1915–20.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maserejian NN, Chen S, Chiu GR, et al. Treatment status and progression or regression of lower urinary tract symptoms in a general adult population sample. J Urol. 2014;191(1):107–13.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McVary KT, Roehrborn CG, Avins AL, et al. Update on AUA guideline on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2011;185(5):1793–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Madersbacher S1, Alivizatos G, Nordling J, et al. EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines). Eur Urol. 2004;46(5):547–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The study was funded by an unconditional research grant from GlaxoSmithKline Inc., Slovakia, which played a role in conducting the study as well as the data collection.

Conflicts of interest

Danica Fackovcova, MD, is a scientific consultant to Glaxo- SmithKline-Slovakia. All other authors have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Weibl MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weibl, P., Laurinc, P., Tomaškin, R. et al. Patient’s and physician’s behavior on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia among the patients at the risk of clinical progression. A multicenter noninterventional trial in Slovakia by “Prostate and Expectations of Treatment: Epidemiology Research” (PETER) study group. Wien Klin Wochenschr 127, 434–439 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-015-0751-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-015-0751-5

Keywords

Navigation