Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does delayed esophagectomy after endoscopic resection affect outcomes in patients with stage T1 esophageal cancer? A propensity score-based analysis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although endoscopic resection (ER) may be sufficient treatment for early-stage esophageal cancer, additional treatment is recommended when there is a high risk of cancer recurrence. It is unclear whether delaying esophagectomy by performing and assessing the success of ER affects outcomes as compared with immediate esophagectomy without ER. Additionally, long-term survival after sequential ER and esophagectomy required further investigation.

Methods

Between 2011 and 2015, 48 patients with stage T1 esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy after ER with curative intent at our institution. Two-to-one propensity score methods were used to identify 96 matched-control patients who were treated with esophagectomy only using baseline patient, tumor characteristics and surgical approach. Time from initial evaluation to esophagectomy, relapse-free survival, overall survival, and postoperative complications were compared between the propensity-matched groups.

Results

In the ER + esophagectomy group, the time from initial evaluation to esophagectomy was significantly longer than in the esophagectomy only group (114 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001). The incidence of dense adhesion (p = 0.347), operative time (p = 0.867), postoperative surgical complications (p = 0.966), and postoperative length of hospital stay (p = 0.125) were not significantly different between the groups. Moreover, recurrence-free survival and overall survival were also similar between the two groups (p = 0.411 and p = 0.817, respectively).

Conclusions

Treatment of stage T1 esophageal cancer with ER prior to esophagectomy did not increase the difficulty of performing esophagectomy or the incidence of postoperative complications and did not affect survival after esophagectomy. These results suggest that ER can be recommended for patients with stage T1 cancer even if esophagectomy is warranted eventually.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang GQ, Jiao GG, Chang FB, Fang WH, Song JX, Lu N, Lin DM, Xie YQ, Yang L (2004) Long-term results of operation for 420 patients with early squamous cell esophageal carcinoma discovered by screening. Ann Thorac Surg 77(5):1740–1744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pech O, Bollschweiler E, Manner H, Leers J, Ell C, Holscher AH (2011) Comparison between endoscopic and surgical resection of mucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus at two high-volume centers. Ann Surg 254(1):67–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim DU, Lee JH, Min BH, Shim SG, Chang DK, Kim YH, Rhee PL, Kim JJ, Rhee JC, Kim KM, Shim YM (2008) Risk factors of lymph node metastasis in T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23(4):619–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Spechler SJ (2015) Dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: limitations of current management strategies. Am J Gastroenterol 100(4):927–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pech O, May A, Gossner L, Rabenstein T, Manner H, Huijsmans J, Vieth M, Stolte M, Berres M, Ell C (2007) Curative endoscopic therapy in patients with early esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Endoscopy 39(1):30–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Das A, Singh V, Fleischer DE, Sharma VK (2008) A comparison of endoscopic treatment and surgery in early esophageal cancer: an analysis of surveillance epidemiology and end results data. Am J Gastroenterol 103(6):1340–1345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nealis TB, Washington K, Keswani RN (2011) Endoscopic therapy of esophageal premalignancy and early malignancy. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw: JNCCN 9(8):890–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi JY, Park YS, Jung HY, Ahn JY, Kim MY, Lee JH, Choi KS, Kim do H, Choi KD, Song HJ, Lee GH, Cho KJ, Kim JH (2011) Feasibility of endoscopic resection in superficial esophageal squamous carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 73(5):881–889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park JS, Youn YH, Park JJ, Kim JH, Park H (2016) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous neoplasms. Clin Endosc 49(2):168–175

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Qin X, He S, Zhang Y, Xue L, Lu N, Wang G (2014) Diagnosis and staging of superficial esophageal precursor based on pre-endoscopic resection system comparable to endoscopic resection. BMC Cancer 14:774

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, Keswani RN, Chung J, Sherman KL, Knab LM, Posner MC, Bentrem DJ (2014) Treatment trends, risk of lymph node metastasis, and outcomes for localized esophageal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 106(7):dju133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Davison JM, Landau MS, Luketich JD, McGrath KM, Foxwell TJ, Landsittel DP, Gibson MK, Nason KS et al (2016) A model based on pathologic features of superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma complements clinical node staging in determining risk of metastasis to lymph nodes. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 14(3):369–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pech O, May A, Manner H, Behrens A, Pohl J, Weferling M, Hartmann U, Manner N, Huijsmans J, Gossner L, Rabenstein T, Vieth M, Stolte M, Ell C et al (2014) Long-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for patients with mucosal adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Gastroenterology 146(3):652–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gertler R, Stein HJ, Schuster T, Rondak IC, Höfler H, Feith M et al (2014) Prevalence and topography of lymph node metastases in early esophageal and gastric cancer. Ann Surg 259(1):96–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Participants in the Paris Workshop (2003) The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 58 (6 Suppl): S3–S43

  16. Van Westreenen HL, Westerterp M, Bossuyt PM, Pruim J, Sloof GW, van Lanschot JJ, Groen H, Plukker JT (2004) Systematic review of the staging performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22(18):3805–3812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lightdale CJ, Kulkarni KG (2005) Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging and follow-up of esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(20):4483–4489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eguchi T, Nakanishi Y, Shimoda T, Iwasaki M, Igaki H, Tachimori Y, Kato H, Yamaguchi H, Saito D, Umemura S (2006) Histopathological criteria for additional treatment after endoscopic mucosal resection for esophageal cancer: analysis of 464 surgically resected cases. Modern Pathol 19(3):475–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ciocirlan M, Lapalus MG, Hervieu V, Souquet JC, Napoleon B, Scoazec JY, Lefort C, Saurin JC, Ponchon T (2007) Endoscopic mucosal resection for squamous premalignant and early malignant lesions of the esophagus. Endoscopy 39(1):24–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers. http://www.nccn.org. Version 1.2017. Updated March 21, 2017. Accessed 1 June 2017

  21. Tomita N, Matsumoto T, Hayashi T, Arakawa A, Sonoue H, Kajiyama Y, Tsurumaru M (2008) Lymphatic invasion according to D2-40 immunostaining is a strong predictor of nodal metastasis in superficial squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: algorithm for risk of nodal metastasis based on lymphatic invasion. Pathol Int 58(5):282–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Lang H (2013) Endoscopic and surgical resection of T1a/T1b esophageal neoplasms: a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 19(9):1424–1437

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Holscher AH (2007) Endoscopic mucosal resection for early squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus–a dangerous game or standard treatment? Endoscopy 39(1):77–79

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Badreddine RJ, Prasad GA, Lewis JT, Lutzke LS, Borkenhagen LS, Dunagan KT, Wang KK (2010) Depth of submucosal invasion does not predict lymph node metastasis and survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8(3):248–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ono S, Fujishiro M, Niimi K, Goto O, Kodashima S, Yamamichi N, Omata M (2009) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 70(5):860–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Takahashi H, Arimura Y, Masao H, Okahara S, Tanuma T, Kodaira J, Kagaya H, Shimizu Y, Hokari K, Tsukagoshi H, Shinomura Y, Fujita M (2010) Endoscopic submucosal dissection is superior to conventional endoscopic resection as a curative treatment for early squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 72(2):255–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Okada K, Tsuchida T, Ishiyama A, Taniguchi T, Suzuki S, Horiuchi Y, Matsuo Y, Yoshizawa N, Suganuma T, Omae M, Kubota M, Hirasawa T, Yamamoto Y, Inamori M, Yamamoto N, Nakajima A (2012) Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for en bloc resection of superficial pharyngeal carcinomas. Endoscopy 44(6):556–564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tang B, Bai JY, Zhao XY, Fan CQ, Yang X, Deng L, Yang SM, Yu J (2015) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer with near-circumferential lesions: our experience with 40 patients. Surg Endosc 29(8):2141–2148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported, in part, by Shanghai Science and Technology Commission Foundation key project (14JC140140), Grant from Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (No. 15411951602; No. 16401970704), Trans-Century Training Programme Foundation for the Talents by the State Education Commission (NCET-13-0148), Grant from Health and Family Planning Commission of Shanghai Municipality (No. XYQ2011025; No. 2013ZYJB0301). We thank Shannon Wyszomierski, Ph.D. for editing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Shengfei Wang, Yangle Huang, Juntao Xie, Lingdun Zhuge, Longlong Shao, Jiaqing Xiang, Yawei Zhang, Yihua Sun, Hong Hu, Sufeng Chen, Toni Lerut, James Luketich, Jie Zhang, and Haiquan Chen have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Shengfei Wang, Yangle Huang, and Juntao Xie contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Huang, Y., Xie, J. et al. Does delayed esophagectomy after endoscopic resection affect outcomes in patients with stage T1 esophageal cancer? A propensity score-based analysis. Surg Endosc 32, 1441–1448 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5830-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5830-4

Keywords

Navigation