Skip to main content
Log in

Management of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band erosion

  • Review
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) was a popular procedure in the USA and Europe in the past decade. However, its use has currently declined. Band erosion (BE) is a rare complication after LAGB with a reported incidence rate of 1.46 %. Controversies exist regarding the management, approach and timing for the band removal. The aim of this study is to describe the rate, clinical presentation and perioperative outcomes of BEs at our institution and provide overall recommendations regarding the diagnosis and management of BE.

Materials and methods

This study is a single-center, retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. Data were collected from all consecutive patients who underwent a LAGB and band revisional surgeries at the University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System from December 2008 to September 2015. We identified patients who underwent gastric band removal due to a BE and analyzed their outcomes.

Results

A total of 576 LAGBs were performed at our institution. Nine patients underwent surgery for BE at our hospital. The average time between the primary surgery and the removal of the band was 68.5 (42.9) months. Abdominal pain, nausea and/or vomiting were the most frequently mentioned symptoms. In all patients, a minimally invasive approach was used to remove the band. The mean length of hospitalization was 2.6 (1.1) days. The only complication was a pneumonia (n = 1).

Conclusions

BE is one of the most severe complications of LAGB. The minimally invasive approach provided us with the opportunity to repair the fistula, and it was associated with a prompt recovery with very little morbidity. In general, it is recommended that the band be removed at the time of the diagnosis of the BE. Endoscopic band removal can be utilized with patients who have a more advanced BE and migration into the gastric lumen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Echaverry-Navarrete DJ, Maldonado-Vazquez A, Cortes-Romano P, Cabrera-Jardines R, Mondragon-Pinzon EE, Castillo-Gonzalez FA (2015) Gastric band erosion: alternative management. Cir Cir 83:418–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sturm R, Hattori A (2013) Morbid obesity rates continue to rise rapidly in the United States. Int J Obes 37:889–891

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cherian PT, Goussous G, Ashori F, Sigurdsson A (2010) Band erosion after laparoscopic gastric banding: a retrospective analysis of 865 patients over 5 years. Surg Endosc 24:2031–2038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Solomon H, Liu GY, Alami R, Morton J, Curet MJ (2009) Benefits to patients choosing preoperative weight loss in gastric bypass surgery: new results of a randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg 208:241–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ponce J, Nguyen NT, Hutter M, Sudan R, Morton JM (2015) American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of bariatric surgery procedures in the United States, 2011–2014. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11:1199–1200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kodner C, Hartman DR (2014) Complications of adjustable gastric banding surgery for obesity. Am Fam Physician 89:813–818

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pentin PL, Nashelsky J (2005) What are the indications for bariatric surgery? J Fam Pract 54:633–634

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Brien PE (2010) Bariatric surgery: mechanisms, indications and outcomes. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:1358–1365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kohn GP, Hansen CA, Gilhome RW, McHenry RC, Spilias DC, Hensman C (2012) Laparoscopic management of gastric band erosions: a 10-year series of 49 cases. Surg Endosc 26:541–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Trujillo MR, Muller D, Widmer JD, Warschkow R, Muller MK (2015) Long-term follow-up of gastric banding 10 years and beyond. Obes Surg 26:581–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aarts EO, van Wageningen B, Berends F, Janssen I, Wahab P, Groenen M (2015) Intragastric band erosion: experiences with gastrointestinal endoscopic removal. World J Gastroenterol 21:1567–1572

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Dogan UB, Akin MS, Yalaki S, Akova A, Yilmaz C (2014) Endoscopic management of gastric band erosions: a 7-year series of 14 patients. Can J Surg 57:106–111

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Egberts K, Brown WA, O’Brien PE (2011) Systematic review of erosion after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg 21:1272–1279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mozzi E, Lattuada E, Zappa MA, Granelli P, De Ruberto F, Armocida A, Roviaro G (2011) Treatment of band erosion: feasibility and safety of endoscopic band removal. Surg Endosc 25:3918–3922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown WA, Egberts KJ, Franke-Richard D, Thodiyil P, Anderson ML, O’Brien PE (2013) Erosions after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: diagnosis and management. Ann Surg 257:1047–1052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. El-Hayek K, Timratana P, Brethauer SA, Chand B (2013) Complete endoscopic/transgastric retrieval of eroded gastric band: description of a novel technique and review of the literature. Surg Endosc 27:2974–2979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodarte-Shade M, Barrera GT, Arredondo JF, Diaz RR (2013) Hybrid technique for removal of eroded adjustable gastric band. JSLS 17:338–341

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Carandina S, Tabbara M, Bossi M, Helmy N, Polliand C, Barrat C (2014) Two stages conversion of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass. A study of one hundred patients. J Gastrointest Surg 18:1730–1736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chisholm J, Kitan N, Toouli J, Kow L (2011) Gastric band erosion in 63 cases: endoscopic removal and rebanding evaluated. Obes Surg 21:1676–1681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hutter MM, Schirmer BD, Jones DB, Ko CY, Cohen ME, Merkow RP, Nguyen NT (2011) First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg 254:410–420

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Campos JM, Evangelista LF, Galvao Neto MP, Ramos AC, Martins JP, dos Santos MA, Ferraz AA Jr (2010) Small erosion of adjustable gastric band: endoscopic removal through incision in gastric wall. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:e215–e217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Neto MP, Ramos AC, Campos JM, Murakami AH, Falcao M, Moura EH, Evangelista LF, Escalona A, Zundel N (2010) Endoscopic removal of eroded adjustable gastric band: lessons learned after 5 years and 78 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:423–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Quadri.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Pablo Quadri, Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia, Mario Masrur, Lisa Sanchez-Johnsen and Enrique Elli have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quadri, P., Gonzalez-Heredia, R., Masrur, M. et al. Management of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band erosion. Surg Endosc 31, 1505–1512 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5183-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5183-4

Keywords

Navigation