Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Totally laparoscopic liver resections for primary and metastatic cancer in the elderly: safety, feasibility and short-term outcomes

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Standard oncologic liver resections performed on elderly patients (≥70 years old) have been shown to be safe and effective. The aim of this study was to analyze operative and oncologic short-term outcomes of totally laparoscopic liver resections (TLLR) performed on elderly patients for malignancies.

Methods

We performed a retrospective statistical analysis of prospectively recorded data of TLLR performed from October 2008 to February 2012 by a single hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeon. Patients were divided into two groups according to age (<70 vs. ≥70 years old) and perioperative outcomes were compared.

Result

A total of 60 TLLR for malignancies were identified of which 25 patients (42 %) were aged ≥70 years (Group A) and 35 (58 %) were aged <70 years (Group B). There was no difference in operative time (170 vs. 180 min, p = 0.267), median blood loss (200 vs. 250 ml, p = 0.183), number and time of Pringle maneuver (p = 0.563 and p = 0.180), blood transfusion rate (4 vs. 17 %, p = 0.222), conversion rate (4 vs. 9 %, p = 0.443), morbidity rate (12 vs. 20 %, p = 0.797), and perioperative mortality rate (0 vs. 3 %, p = 0.688). An R0 resection was achieved in 92 (Group A) versus 83 % (Group B) (p = 0.265). At a median follow-up of 18 months, 12 % of patients in Group A experienced a disease recurrence with a related mortality rate similar to that of Group B (8 vs. 12 %, p = 0.375).

Conclusion

This retrospective comparative study shows that TLLR performed on elderly for liver neoplasm are feasible and safe and lead to short-term outcomes similar to those of younger patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO) World Health Statistics 2012. WHO, Geneva. Available from http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/EN_WHS2012_Full.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2012

  2. Yamada S, Shimada M, Miyake H, Utsunomiya T, Morine Y, Imura S et al (2012) Outcome of hepatectomy in super-elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 42:454–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cook E, Welsh F, Chandrakumaran K, John T, Rees M (2012) Resection of colorectal liver metastases in the elderly: does age matter? Colorectal Dis 14(10):1210–1216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Di Benedetto F, Berretta M, D’Amico G, Montalti R, De RN, Cautero N et al (2011) Liver resection for colorectal metastases in older adults: a paired matched analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 59:2282–2290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cannon RM, Martin RC, Callender GG, McMasters KM, Scoggins CR (2011) Safety and efficacy of hepatectomy for colorectal metastases in the elderly. J Surg Oncol 104:804–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kulik U, Framke T, Grosshennig A, Ceylan A, Bektas H, Klempnauer J, Lehner F (2011) Liver resection of colorectal liver metastases in elderly patients. World J Surg 35:2063–2072

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Adam R, Frilling A, Elias D, Laurent C, Ramos E, Capussotti L, Poston GJ, Wicherts DA, de Haas RJ (2010) Liver resection of colorectal metastases in elderly patients. Br J Surg 97:366–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Menon KV, Al-Mukhtar A, Aldouri A, Prasad RK, Lodge PA, Toogood GJ (2006) Outcomes after major hepatectomy in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:677–683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen KT, Laurent A, Dagher I, Geller DA, Steel J, Thomas MT et al (2009) Minimally invasive liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional, international report of safety, feasibility, and early outcomes. Ann Surg 250:842–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Belli G, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Belli A, Russolillo N (2004) Laparoscopic liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients. HPB (Oxford) 6:236–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A, Steel JJ, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2011) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 146:348–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gustafson JD, Fox JP, Ouellette JR, Hellan M, Termuhlen P, McCarthy MC, Thambi-Pillai T (2012) Open versus laparoscopic liver resection: looking beyond the immediate postoperative period. Surg Endosc 26:468–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Strasberg S, Belghiti J, Clavien P, Gadzijev E, Garden O, Lau W et al (2000) IHPBA Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy & resections. HPB (Oxford) 2:333–339

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrero A, Vigano L, Polastri R, Ribero D, Lo TR, Muratore A, Capussotti L (2005) Hepatectomy as treatment of choice for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly cirrhotic patients. World J Surg 29:1101–1105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang J, Li BK, Chen GH, Li JQ, Zhang YQ, Li GH, Yuan YF (2009) Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1627–1635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sastre J, Pallardo FV, Pla R, Pellin A, Juan G, O’Connor JE, Estrela JM, Miquel J, Vina J (1996) Aging of the liver: age-associated mitochondrial damage in intact hepatocytes. Hepatology 24:1199–1205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Reddy SK, Barbas AS, Turley RS, Gamblin TC, Geller DA, Marsh JW, Tsung A, Clary BM, Lagoo-Deenadayalan S (2011) Major liver resection in elderly patients: a multi-institutional analysis. J Am Coll Surg 212:787–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Abu HM, Di Fabio F, Abu SM, Pearce NW (2012) Oncological efficiency analysis of laparoscopic liver resection for primary and metastatic cancer: a single-center UK experience. Arch Surg 147:42–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. G. Mudo’ from the Department Experimental Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Human Physiology, University of Palermo (Italy) for her kindly assistance in the editing of the manuscript. Dr. Francesco Puleo is currently granted by Fonds Erasme, Brussels, Belgium.

Disclosures

Marcello G. Spampinato, Marianna Arvanitakis, Lucio Mandala’, Giuseppe Quarta, Donatella Traisci, Antonella Plaia, Nicola Di Bartolomeo, Giànandrea Baldazzi, and Umberto Cillo have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcello Giuseppe Spampinato.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spampinato, M.G., Arvanitakis, M., Puleo, F. et al. Totally laparoscopic liver resections for primary and metastatic cancer in the elderly: safety, feasibility and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 27, 1881–1886 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2687-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2687-4

Keywords

Navigation