Abstract
Background
Standard oncologic liver resections performed on elderly patients (≥70 years old) have been shown to be safe and effective. The aim of this study was to analyze operative and oncologic short-term outcomes of totally laparoscopic liver resections (TLLR) performed on elderly patients for malignancies.
Methods
We performed a retrospective statistical analysis of prospectively recorded data of TLLR performed from October 2008 to February 2012 by a single hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeon. Patients were divided into two groups according to age (<70 vs. ≥70 years old) and perioperative outcomes were compared.
Result
A total of 60 TLLR for malignancies were identified of which 25 patients (42 %) were aged ≥70 years (Group A) and 35 (58 %) were aged <70 years (Group B). There was no difference in operative time (170 vs. 180 min, p = 0.267), median blood loss (200 vs. 250 ml, p = 0.183), number and time of Pringle maneuver (p = 0.563 and p = 0.180), blood transfusion rate (4 vs. 17 %, p = 0.222), conversion rate (4 vs. 9 %, p = 0.443), morbidity rate (12 vs. 20 %, p = 0.797), and perioperative mortality rate (0 vs. 3 %, p = 0.688). An R0 resection was achieved in 92 (Group A) versus 83 % (Group B) (p = 0.265). At a median follow-up of 18 months, 12 % of patients in Group A experienced a disease recurrence with a related mortality rate similar to that of Group B (8 vs. 12 %, p = 0.375).
Conclusion
This retrospective comparative study shows that TLLR performed on elderly for liver neoplasm are feasible and safe and lead to short-term outcomes similar to those of younger patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
World Health Organization (WHO) World Health Statistics 2012. WHO, Geneva. Available from http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/EN_WHS2012_Full.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2012
Yamada S, Shimada M, Miyake H, Utsunomiya T, Morine Y, Imura S et al (2012) Outcome of hepatectomy in super-elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 42:454–458
Cook E, Welsh F, Chandrakumaran K, John T, Rees M (2012) Resection of colorectal liver metastases in the elderly: does age matter? Colorectal Dis 14(10):1210–1216
Di Benedetto F, Berretta M, D’Amico G, Montalti R, De RN, Cautero N et al (2011) Liver resection for colorectal metastases in older adults: a paired matched analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 59:2282–2290
Cannon RM, Martin RC, Callender GG, McMasters KM, Scoggins CR (2011) Safety and efficacy of hepatectomy for colorectal metastases in the elderly. J Surg Oncol 104:804–808
Kulik U, Framke T, Grosshennig A, Ceylan A, Bektas H, Klempnauer J, Lehner F (2011) Liver resection of colorectal liver metastases in elderly patients. World J Surg 35:2063–2072
Adam R, Frilling A, Elias D, Laurent C, Ramos E, Capussotti L, Poston GJ, Wicherts DA, de Haas RJ (2010) Liver resection of colorectal metastases in elderly patients. Br J Surg 97:366–376
Menon KV, Al-Mukhtar A, Aldouri A, Prasad RK, Lodge PA, Toogood GJ (2006) Outcomes after major hepatectomy in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:677–683
Nguyen KT, Laurent A, Dagher I, Geller DA, Steel J, Thomas MT et al (2009) Minimally invasive liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional, international report of safety, feasibility, and early outcomes. Ann Surg 250:842–848
Belli G, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Belli A, Russolillo N (2004) Laparoscopic liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients. HPB (Oxford) 6:236–246
Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A, Steel JJ, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2011) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 146:348–356
Gustafson JD, Fox JP, Ouellette JR, Hellan M, Termuhlen P, McCarthy MC, Thambi-Pillai T (2012) Open versus laparoscopic liver resection: looking beyond the immediate postoperative period. Surg Endosc 26:468–472
Strasberg S, Belghiti J, Clavien P, Gadzijev E, Garden O, Lau W et al (2000) IHPBA Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy & resections. HPB (Oxford) 2:333–339
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213
Ferrero A, Vigano L, Polastri R, Ribero D, Lo TR, Muratore A, Capussotti L (2005) Hepatectomy as treatment of choice for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly cirrhotic patients. World J Surg 29:1101–1105
Huang J, Li BK, Chen GH, Li JQ, Zhang YQ, Li GH, Yuan YF (2009) Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1627–1635
Sastre J, Pallardo FV, Pla R, Pellin A, Juan G, O’Connor JE, Estrela JM, Miquel J, Vina J (1996) Aging of the liver: age-associated mitochondrial damage in intact hepatocytes. Hepatology 24:1199–1205
Reddy SK, Barbas AS, Turley RS, Gamblin TC, Geller DA, Marsh JW, Tsung A, Clary BM, Lagoo-Deenadayalan S (2011) Major liver resection in elderly patients: a multi-institutional analysis. J Am Coll Surg 212:787–795
Abu HM, Di Fabio F, Abu SM, Pearce NW (2012) Oncological efficiency analysis of laparoscopic liver resection for primary and metastatic cancer: a single-center UK experience. Arch Surg 147:42–48
Acknowledgments
We thank Prof. G. Mudo’ from the Department Experimental Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Human Physiology, University of Palermo (Italy) for her kindly assistance in the editing of the manuscript. Dr. Francesco Puleo is currently granted by Fonds Erasme, Brussels, Belgium.
Disclosures
Marcello G. Spampinato, Marianna Arvanitakis, Lucio Mandala’, Giuseppe Quarta, Donatella Traisci, Antonella Plaia, Nicola Di Bartolomeo, Giànandrea Baldazzi, and Umberto Cillo have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spampinato, M.G., Arvanitakis, M., Puleo, F. et al. Totally laparoscopic liver resections for primary and metastatic cancer in the elderly: safety, feasibility and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 27, 1881–1886 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2687-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2687-4