Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gender Effect on Oral Volume Capacity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies have shown anatomical and functional differences between men and women with respect to the mouth, pharynx, upper esophageal sphincter, and esophagus. The aim of this investigation was to analyze the influence of gender, body mass index (BMI), age, and orofacial anthropometric measurements on the intraoral maximum volume capacity for liquid. The investigation included asymptomatic subjects, 56 females and 44 males, aged 19–53 years. The volunteers sucked water through a straw up to the maximum tolerated oral volume, which was greater in men (71.2 ± 15.0 ml) than in women (55.4 ± 13.4 ml). Age, BMI, height, and number of teeth had no influence on the intraoral tolerated volume. Anthropometric orofacial measurements were greater in men than in women. In individuals with height between 1.66 and 1.89 m, anthropometric orofacial measurements were greater in men than in women, and the tolerated intraoral volume was greater in men than in women. There was a positive correlation between orofacial measurements and intraoral maximum volume. In conclusion, men have the capacity to place a larger volume of water inside their mouth than women. This observation is associated with higher anthropometric orofacial measures, but not with age, number of teeth, height, or BMI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Felício CM. Sistema estomatognático e funções. In: Felício CM, editor. Fonoaudiologia aplicada a casos odontológicos: motricidade oral e audiologia. São Paulo: Pancast; 1999. p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dantas RO, Kern MK, Massey BT, Dodds WJ, Kahrilas PJ, Brasseur JG, Cook IJ, Lang IM. Effect of swallowed bolus variables on oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. Am J Physiol. 1990;258:G675–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schultz PerlmanAL, JG Van, Daele DJ. Effects of age, gender, bolus volume, and bolus viscosity on oropharygeal pressure during swallowing. J Appl Physiol. 1993;75:33–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Adeleye B, Rachal C. Comparison of the rheological properties of ready-to-serve and powdered instant food-thickened beverages at different temperatures for dysphagic patients. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107:1176–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bass NH. The neurology of swallowing. In: Groher ME, editor. Dysphagia–diagnosis and management. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997. p. 7–35.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lawless HT, Bender S, Oman C, Pelletier C. Gender, age, vessel size, cup vs. straw sipping, and sequence effects on sip volume. Dysphagia. 2003;18:196–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hughes TA, Wiles CM. Clinical measurement of swallowing in health and in neurogenic dysphagia. QJM. 1996;89:109–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alves LM, Cassiani RA, Santos CM, Dantas RO. Gender effect on the clinical measurement of swallowing. Arq Gastroenterol. 2007;44:227–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dantas RO, Ferriolli E, Souza MAN. Gender effects on esophageal motility. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1998;31:539–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gluckman A. Sexual dimorphism in human and mammalian biology and pathology. New York: Academic Press; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dantas RO, Cassiani RA, Santos CM, Gonzaga GM, Alves LM, Mazin SC. Effect of gender on swallow event duration assessed by videofluoroscopy. Dysphagia. 2008;24:280–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Adnerhill I, Ekberg O, Groher ME. Determining normal bolus size for thin liquids. Dysphagia. 1989;4:1–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nilsson H, Ekberg O, Olsson R, Kjellin O, Hindfelt B. Quantitative assessment of swallowing in healthy adults. Dysphagia. 1996;11:110–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Psillakis JM, Lucardi V. Proporções estéticas da face. In: Psillakis JM, Zanini AS, Mélega JM, Costa EA, Cruz RL, editors. Cirurgia craniomaxilofacial: osteotomias da face. Rio de Janeiro: Medsi; 1987. p. 297–313.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Langlade M. Análise da estética. In: Langlade M, editor. Diagnóstico ortodôntico. São Paulo: Santos; 1995. p. 129–60.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sunguino R, Ramos AL, Terada HH, Furquim LZ, Maeda L, Silva Filho OG. Análise facial. R Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Maxilar. 1996;1:86–107.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cattoni DM. O uso do paquímetro na motricidade orofacial: procedimentos de avaliação. Barueri: Pró-Fono; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  18. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation on obesity. Geneva: World Health Organization, 3–5 June 1997.

  19. Schall R. Estimation in generalized linear models with random effects. Biometrika. 1991;78:719–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. SAS/STAT® User’s Guide, version 9.0, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2002-2003.

  21. Bennett JW, Van Lieshout PHHM, Pelletier CA, Steele CM. Sip-sizing behaviors in natural drinking conditions compared to instructed experimental conditions. Dysphagia. 2009;24:152–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alves LM, Santos CM, Cassiani RA, Dantas RO. Dinâmica da deglutição de líquido em pessoas obesas. GED. 2007;26:187–90.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nilsson H, Ekberg O, Olsson R, Kjellin O, Hindfelt B. Quantitative aspects of swallowing in an elderly nondysphagic populations. Dysphagia. 1996;11:180–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Herdy JL, Nouer PR, Junqueira JL, Gumieiro EH. Morfologia e alterações do perfil facial durante o crescimento. Ortodontia. 2002;35:109–19.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Valente ROH, Oliveira MG. Valores normativos e dimorfismo sexual em perfis esteticamente agradáveis, através das análises cefalométricas computadorizadas (Ricketts e McNamara). Pesq Odontol Bras. 2003;17:29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Enlow DH, Hans MG. Forma e Padrão da Face. In: Enlow DH, Hans MG, editors. Noções básicas sobre crescimento facial. São Paulo: Santos; 2003. p. 130–41.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mendell DA, Logemann JA. Temporal sequence of swallow events during the oropharyngeal swallow. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007;50:1256–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoffman MR, Ciucci MR, Mielens JD, Jiang JJ, McCulloch TM. Pharyngeal swallow adaptations to bolus volume measured with high-resolution manometry. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:2367–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Butler SG, Stuart A, Case LD, Rees C, Vitolins M, Kritchevsky SB. Effect of liquid type, delivery method, and bolus volume on penetration-aspiration scores in healthy older adults during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011;120:288–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ochiai KT, Hojo S, Nakamura C, Ikeda H, Garrett NR. Impact of facial form on the relationship between conventional or implant-assisted mandibular dentures and masticatory function. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;105:256–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Oliveira Dantas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nascimento, W.V., Cassiani, R.A. & Dantas, R.O. Gender Effect on Oral Volume Capacity. Dysphagia 27, 384–389 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9379-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9379-4

Keywords

Navigation