Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Warming chambers stimulate early season growth of an arctic sedge: results of a minirhizotron field study

  • Ecosystem Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the effects of passive open-top warming chambers on Eriophorum vaginatum production near Toolik Lake, Alaska, USA. During the 2002 growing season, chamber warming was consistent with the magnitude and seasonality observed in recent decades throughout northwestern North America. Leaf-growth rates were higher in late May and early June; maximum growth rates in each leaf cohort occurred earlier and peak biomass was observed 20 days earlier within the chambers. Consequently, plants within the chambers maintained more live leaf biomass during the period of highest photosynthetically active radiation. Annual leaf production within the chambers (21±2 mg tiller) was not significantly different than under ambient conditions (17±2 mg tiller) (P=0.2256) despite higher early-season growth rates. Root growth began earlier; growth rates were higher in late May and early June, and maximum growth rates occurred earlier within the chambers. Therefore, plants within the chambers maintained greater root biomass during what earlier studies have identified as a period of relatively high nutrient availability. Annual root production within the chambers (191±42 g m−2) was not significantly different than under ambient conditions (119±48 g m−2) (P=0.1979), although there was a trend toward higher production within the chambers. The tendency toward higher root production within the chambers is consistent with previous laboratory experiments and with the predictions of biomass allocation theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arft AM, Walker MD, Gurevitch J, Alatalo JM, Bret-Harte MS, Dale M, Diemer M, Gugerli F, Henry GHR, Jones MH, Hollister RT, Jónsdóttir IS, Laine K, Lévesque E, Marion GM, Molau U, Mø lgaard P, Nordenhäll U, Raszhivin V, Robinson CH, Starr G, Stenström A, Stenström M, Totland ø , Turner PL, Walker LJ, Webber PJ, Welker JM, Wookey PA (1999) Responses of tundra plants to experimental warming: meta-analysis of the international tundra experiment. Ecol Monogr 69(4):491–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Bret-Harte MS, Shaver GR, Zoerner JP, Johnstone JF, Wagner JL, Chavez AS, Gunkelman RF, Lippert SC, Laundre JA (2001) Developmental plasticity allows Betula nana to dominate tundra subjected to an altered environment. Ecology 82(1):18–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Bret-Harte MS, Shaver GR, Chapin FS III (2002) Primary and secondary stem growth in arctic shrubs: implications for community response to environmental change. J Ecol 90(2):251–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer R (1962) Nutritive influences on the distribution of dry matter in the plant. Neth J Agric Sci 10(5):399–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III, Van Cleve K, Chapin MC (1979) Soil temperature and nutrient cycling in the tussock growth form of Eriophorum vaginatum. J Ecol 67:169–189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III (1983) Direct and indirect effects of temperature on arctic plants. Polar Biol 2(1):47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III, Shaver GR (1985) Individualistic growth response of tundra plant species to environmental manipulations in the field. Ecology 66(2):564–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III, Fetcher N, Kielland K, Everett KR, Linkins AE (1988) Productivity and nutrient cycling of Alaskan tundra: enhancement by flowing soil water. Ecology 69(3):693–702

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III, Shaver GR, Giblin AE, Nadelhoffer KJ, Laundre JA (1995) Responses of arctic tundra to experimental and observed changes in climate. Ecology 76(3):694–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III, Shaver GR (1996) Physiological and growth responses of arctic plants to a field experiment simulating climatic change. Ecology 77:822–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III, McGuire AD, Randerson J, Pielke R Sr, Baldocchi D, Hobbie SE, Roulet N, Eugster W, Kasischke E, Rastetter EB, Zimov SA, Running SW (2000) Arctic and boreal ecosystems of western North America as components of the climate system. Global Change Biol 6 [Suppl]:211–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson RL (1969) Effect of root/leaf temperature differentials on root/shoot ratios in some pasture grasses and clover. Ann Bot 33:571–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Defoliart LS, Griffith M, Chapin FS III, Jonasson S (1988) Seasonal patterns of photosynthesis and nutrient storage in Eriophorum vaginatum L., an arctic sedge. Funct Ecol 2:185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Eviner VT, Chapin FS III (2003) Functional matrix: a conceptual framework for predicting multiple plant effects on ecosystem processes. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:455–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrar JF, Jones DL (2000) The control of carbon acquisition by roots. New Phytol 147(1):43–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton TD (1986) Late Cenozoic glaciation of the central Brooks Range. In: Hamilton TD, Reid KM, Thorson RM (eds) Glaciation in Alaska: the geologic record. Alaska Geologic Society, Anchorage, Alaska, pp 9–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS (1996) Applications of minirhizotrons to understand root function in forests and other natural ecosystems. Plant Soil 185:293–304

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbie SE (1992) Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol Evol 7:336–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbie SE (1996) Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra. Ecol Monogr 66(4):503–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbie SE, Chapin FS III (1998) The response of tundra plant biomass, aboveground production, nitrogen, and CO2 flux to experimental warming. Ecology 79(5):1526–1544

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbie SE, Shevtsova A, Chapin FS III (1999) Plant responses to experimental warming and species removal in Alaskan tussock tundra. Oikos 84(3):417–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollister RD, Webber PJ (2000) Biotic validation of small open-top chambers in a tundra ecosystem. Global Change Biol 6:835–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itoh S (1985) In situ measurement of rooting density by micro-rhizotron. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 31:653–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MG, Tingey DT, Phillips DL, Storm MJ (2001) Advancing fine root research with minirhizotrons. Environ Exp Bot 45:263–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jonasson S, Chapin FS III (1985) Significance of sequential leaf development for nutrient balance of the cotton sedge, Eriophorum vaginatum L. Oecologia 67:511–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones MH, Fahnestock JT, Walker DA, Walker MD, Welker JM (1998) Carbon dioxide fluxes in moist and dry arctic tundra during the snow-free season: responses to increases in summer temperature and winter snow accumulation. Arct Alp Res 30(4):373–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Kummerow J, McMaster GS, Krause DA (1980) Temperature effect on growth and nutrient contents in Eriophorum vaginatum under controlled environmental conditions. Arct Alp Res 12(3):335–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Kummerow J, Ellis B (1984) Temperature effect on biomass production and root/shoot biomass ratios in two arctic sedges under controlled environmental conditions. Can J Bot 62:2150–2153

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambers H (1983) The functional equilibrium, nibbling on the edges of a paradigm. Neth J Agric Sci 31:305–311

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lauenroth WK (2000) Methods of estimating belowground net primary production. In: Sala OE, Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Howarth RW (eds) Methods in ecosystem science. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 58–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73(6):1943–1967

    Google Scholar 

  • Loya WM, Johnson LC, Nadelhoffer KJ (2004) Seasonal dynamics of leaf- and root-derived C in arctic tundra mesocosms. Soil Biol Biochem 36(4):655–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marion GM, Henry GHR, Freckman DW, Johnstone J, Jones G, Jones MH, Levesque E, Molau U, Mø lgaard P, Parsons AN, Svoboda J, Virginia RA (1997) Open-top designs for manipulating field temperature in high-latitude ecosystems. Global Change Biol 3 [Suppl]:20–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molau U, Mølgaard P (1996) ITEX Manual, 2nd edn. Danish Polar Center, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadelhoffer KJ, Giblin AE, Shaver GR, Linkins AE (1992) Microbial processes and plant nutrient availability in arctic soils. In: Chapin FS III, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF, Shaver GR, Svoboda J (eds) Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate: an ecophysiological perspective. Academic, San Diego, pp 281–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Poorter H, Nagel O (2000) The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Aust J Plant Physiol 27:595–607

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quested HM, Press MC, Callaghan TV (2003) Litter of the hemiparasite Bartsia alpina enhances plant growth: evidence for a functional role in nutrient cycling. Oecologia 135(4):606–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruess RW, Hendrick RL, Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS, Sveinbjornsson B, Allen MF, Maurer GE (2003) Coupling fine root dynamics with ecosystem carbon balance in black spruce forests of interior Alaska. Ecol Monogr 73(4):643–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders JL, Brown DA (1978) A new fiber optic technique for measuring root growth of soybeans under field conditions. Agron J 70:1073–1076

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1999) SAS/STAT Users Guide. Version 8.2. SAS Institute, Cary

  • Schimel JP, Bilbrough C, Welker JM (2004) Increased snow depth affects microbial activity and nitrogen mineralization in two Arctic tundra communities. Soil Biol Biochem 36(2):217–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Serreze MC, Walsh JE, Chapin FS III, Osterkamp T, Dyurgerov M, Romanovsky V, Oechel WC, Morison J, Zhang T, Barry RG (2000) Observational evidence of recent change in the northern high-latitude environment. Clim Change 46:159–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver GR, Cutler J (1979) The vertical distribution of phytomass in cottongrass- tussock tundra. Arct Alp Res 11:335–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver GR, Chapin FS III, Gartner BL (1986) Factors limiting seasonal growth and peak biomass accumulation in Eriophorum vaginatum in Alaskan tussock tundra. J Ecol 74:257–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr G, Oberbauer SF (2003) Photosynthesis of arctic evergreens under snow: implications for tundra ecosystem carbon balance. Ecology 84(6):1415–1420

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker MD, Walker DA, Auerbach NA (1994) Plant communities of a tussock tundra landscape in the Brookes Range Foothills, Alaska. J Veg Sci 5(6):843–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker MD, Walker DA, Welker JM, Arft AM, Bardsley T, Brooks PD, Fahnestock JT, Jones MH, Losleben M, Parsons AN, Seastedt TR, Turner PL (1999) Long-term experimental manipulation of winter snow regime and summer temperature in arctic and alpine tundra. Hydrol Process 13:2315–2330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welker JM, Wookey PA, Parsons AN, Press MC, Callaghan TV, Lee JA (1993) Leaf carbon isotope discrimination and vegetative responses of Dryas octopetala to temperature and water manipulations in a high arctic polar semi-desert, Svalbard. Oecologia 94(5):463–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Welker JM, Molau U, Parsons AN, Robinson CH, Wookey PA (1997) Responses of Dryas octopetala to ITEX environmental manipulations: a synthesis with circumpolar comparisons. Global Change Biol 3:61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welker JM, Fahnestock JT, Jones MH (2000) Annual CO2 flux in dry and moist arctic tundra: field responses to increases in summer temperatures and winter snow depth. Clim Change 44:139–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the NSF Office of Polar Programs research grants OPP-9907356, 0196345 and 0120589. We thank C. Bilbrough for proposal contributions, A. Parsons for provision of 1994 micro-meteorological data from the ITEX plots, J. Fahnestock and R. Piper for installing the minirhizotrons, D. Binkley, G. Shaver and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments during manuscript preparation, G. Shaver and the Toolik Lake LTER (NSF-DEB-9810222) for use of meteorological data from the neighboring LTER site, and S. Arens and K. Olin for field and laboratory assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1499, USA

    Patrick F. Sullivan

  2. Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1499, USA

    Patrick F. Sullivan & Jeffrey M. Welker

Authors
  1. Patrick F. Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeffrey M. Welker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick F. Sullivan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sullivan, P.F., Welker, J.M. Warming chambers stimulate early season growth of an arctic sedge: results of a minirhizotron field study. Oecologia 142, 616–626 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1764-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1764-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation