Abstract
In insects, wing shape and body size are correlated with several aspects of behaviour, and the optimal morphology of wings is a trade-off between a number of functional demands in relation to behaviour (e.g. foraging, migration and sexual display). Dragonflies are spectacularly skilful flyers and present a range of different wing shapes, but to date, no detailed studies have been conducted in this group on wing length allometry in relation to body size. In this paper, we use published data on body length and wing length in all European and North American dragonflies to investigate differences in wing length allometries among Odonata taxa (suborders and families) and to relate these to behavioural patterns. We found different wing allometries between Zygoptera and Anisoptera, which are probably related to the flight mode and wing form of the two suborders. Among the Anisoptera, the Libellulidae showed a distinct wing length allometry from all other anisopteran families and migrants differed from non-migrant species. The first dichotomy is likely to reflect the adaptation of wing morphology of Libellulidae to sit-and-wait behaviour and to brief foraging flights (most species of this family are perchers) with respect to all other families, members of which are typically flyers. The second dichotomy reflects the trend of migrating species to have relatively longer wings than non-migrating members of the same family. Finally, wing length allometry differed among all the zygopteran families analysed, and this pattern suggested that each family evolved a particular wing morphology in response to peculiarities in behaviour, habitat and flight mode.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Caski F (eds) Proceeding of the second international symposium on information theory. Akademia Kiado, Budapest
Altizer S, Davis AK (2010) Populations of Monarch butterflies with different migratory behaviours show divergence in wing morphology. Evolution 64:1018–1028
Berwaerts K, van Dyck H, Aerts P (2002) Does flight morphology relate to flight performance? An experimental test with the butterfly Pararge aegeria. Funct Ecol 16:484–491
Blomberg SP, Garland T Jr, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behaviorial traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717–745
Bried JT, Bennett LW, Ervin GN (2005) Live mass and length-mass allometry of adult odonates collected in east-central Mississippi, United States. Odonatologica 34:111–122
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodal inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York
Calmaestra RG, Moreno E (2001) A phylogenetically-based analysis on the relationship between wing morphology and migratory behaviour in Passeriformes. Ardea 89:405–414
Carle FL, Kjer KM, May ML (2008) Evolution of Odonata, with special reference to Coenagrionidae (Zygoptera). Arthr Sys Phyl 66:37–44
Corbet PS (1962) A biology of dragonflies. Witherby, London
Corbet PS (1999) Dragonflies—behaviour and ecology of Odonata. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Corbet PS, May ML (2008) Fliers and perchers among Odonata: dichotomy or multidimensional continuum? A provisional reappraisal. Int J Odonatol 11:155–171
Cordero Rivera A (2000) An analysis of multivariate selection in a non-territorial damselfly (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Etología 8:37–41
Davies R, Nicholson DB, Saunders ELR, Mayhew PJ (2011) Fossil gaps inferred from phylogenies alter the apparent nature of diversification in dragonflies and their relatives. BMC Evol Biol 11:252
Dijkstra KDB, Lewington R (2006) Field Guide to the Dragonflies of Britain and Europe. British Wildlife Publishing, Dorset
Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15
Förschler MI, Bairlein F (2011) Morphological shifts of the external flight apparatus across the range of a Passerine (Northern Wheatear) with diverging migratory behaviour. PLoS ONE 6:1–9
Freckleton RP, Harvey PH, Pagel M (2002) Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am Nat 160:712–726
Grabow K, Rüppel G (1995) Wing loading in relation to size and flight characteristics of European Odonata. Odonatologica 24:175–186
Greenewalt CH (1962) Dimensional relationships for flying animals. Smithson Misc Coll 144:1–46
Hardersen S (2010) Seasonal variation of wing spot allometry in Calopteryx splendens (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Ethol Ecol Evol 22:365–373
Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hasegawa E, Kasuya E (2006) Phylogenetic analysis of the insect order Odonata using 28S and 16S rDNA sequences: a comparison between data sets with different evolutionary rates. Entomol Sci 9:55–66
Johansson F, Söderquist M, Bokma F (2009) Insect wing shape evolution: independent effects of migratory and mate guarding flight on dragonfly wings. Biol J Lin Soc 97:362–372
Jolicoeur P (1990) Bivariate allometry: interval estimation of the slope of the ordinary and standardized normal major axes and structural relationship. J Theor Biol 144:275–285
Kaboli M, Aliabadian M, Guillaumet A, Roselaar C, Prodon R (2007) Ecomorphology of the wheatears (genus Oenanthe). Ibis 149:792–805
Kaitaniemi P (2004) Testing the allometric scaling laws. J Theor Biol 228:149–153
Kembel SW, Cowan PD, Helmus MR, Cornwell WK, Morlon H, Ackerly DD, Blomberg SP, Webb CO (2010) Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinform Appl Notes 11:1463–1464
Knell RJ, Pomfret JC, Tomkins JL (2003) The limits of the elaboration: curved allometries reveal the constraints on mandible size in stag beetles. Proc R Soc Lond Serb 271:523–528
Koenig WD, Albano SS (1987) Lifetime reproductive success, selection, and the opportunity for selection in the White-tailed Skimmer Plathemis lydia (Odonata: Libellulidae). Evolution 41:22–36
Malmqvist B (2000) How does wing length relate to distribution patterns of stoneflies (Plecoptera) and mayflies (Ephemeroptera)? Biol Conserv 93:271–276
May ML (1981) Wingstroke frequency of dragonflies (Odonata: Anisoptera) in relation of temperature and body size. J Comp Physiol B 144:229–240
Needham JG, Westfall MJ, May ML (2000) Dragonflies of North America. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville
Norberg UM (1995) How a long tail and changes in mass and wing shape affect the cost for flight in animals. Funct Ecol 9:48–54
Nudds RL (2007) Wing-bone length allometry in birds. J Avian Biol 38:515–519
Olberg RM, Worthington AH, Venator KR (2000) Prey pursuit and interception in dragonflies. J Comp Physiol A 186:155–162
Paulson DR (2004) Why do some zygopterans (Odonata) perch with open wings? Int J Odonatol 7:505–515
Rehn AC (2003) Phylogenetic analysis of higher-level relationships of Odonata. Sys Biol 28:181–239
Revell LJ, Harmon LJ, Collar DC (2008) Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate. Sys Biol 57:591–601
Roff DA (1990) The evolution of flightlessness in insects. Ecol Monogr 60:389–421
Rundle SD, Bilton DT, Abbott J, Foggo A (2007) Range size in North American Enallagma damselflies correlates with wing size. Fresh Biol 52:471–477
Rüppel G (1989) Kinematic analysis of symmetrical flight manoeuvres of Odonata. J Exp Biol 144:13–42
Russell RW, May ML, Soltesz KL, Fitzpatrick JW (1998) Massive swarm migrations of dragonflies (Odonata) in Eastern North America. Am Midl Nat 140:325–342
Saux C, Simon C, Spicer GS (2003) Phylogeny of the dragonfly and damselfly order Odonata as inferred by mitochondrial 12S ribosomal RNA sequences. Ann Ent Soc Am 96:693–699
Serrano-Meneses MA, Córdoba-Aguilar A, Méndez V, Layen SJ, Székely T (2007) Sexual size dimorphism in the American rubyspot: male body size predicts male competition and mating success. Anim Behav 73:987–997
Sokal RR, Rolph FJ (2012) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 4th edn. Freeman and Co., New York
Stern DL, Moon A, Martinez del Rio C (1996) Caste allometries in the soldier-producing aphid Pseudoregma alexanderi (Hormaphididae: Aphidoidea). Ins Soc 43:137–147
Taylor PD, Merriam G (1995) Wing morphology of a forest damselfly is related to landscape structure. Oikos 73:43–48
Teuscher M, Brändle M, Traxel V, Brandl R (2009) Allometry between leg and body length of insects: lack of support for the size-grain hypothesis. Ecol Entomol 34:718–724
van Dyck H, Matthysen E, Dhondt AA (1997) Mate-locating strategies are related to relative body length and wing colour in the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria. Ecol Entomol 22:116–120
Wakeling JM (1997) Odonatan wing and body morphologies. Odonatologica 26:35–52
Wang X, McGowan AJ, Dyke GJ (2011) Avian wing proportions and flight styles: first step towards predicting the flight modes of mesozoic birds. PLoS ONE 6:e28672. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028672
Warton DI, Wright IJ, Falster DS, Westoby M (2006) Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biol Rev 81:259–291
Warton DI, Duursma R, Falster DS, Taskinen S (2011) smatr: (standardised) major axis estimation and testing routines. R package version 3.2.2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=smatr
Westfall MJ, May ML (1996) Damselflies of North America. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville
Wootton RJ (1991) The functional morphology of the wings of Odonata. Adv Odonatol 5:153–169
Wootton RJ, Newman JS (2008) Evolution, diversification, and mechanics of dragonfly wings. In: Córdoba-Aguilar A (ed) Dragonflies and damselflies—model organisms for ecological and evolutionary research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 261–274
Acknowledgments
We thank Ettore Mitali for his help with data entry, and Anna Macagno for helpful comments on an earlier version of the paper. We also thank Andrew Sturgeon for reviewing the English of the manuscript. The comments of Andrea Cardini and two anonymous reviewers significantly improved the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by A. Schmidt-Rhaesa.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sacchi, R., Hardersen, S. Wing length allometry in Odonata: differences between families in relation to migratory behaviour. Zoomorphology 132, 23–32 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-012-0172-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-012-0172-1