Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Induction chemotherapy plus IMRT alone versus induction chemotherapy plus IMRT-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

  • Original Article – Clinical Oncology
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the value of concurrent chemotherapy after induction chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), we performed this retrospective cohort study to compare the efficiency and toxicities of induction chemotherapy plus IMRT alone (IC + RT) versus induction chemotherapy plus IMRT-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC + CCRT).

Method

We analyzed data from patients with locoregionally advanced NPC (stage III–IVb) who were treated at the West China hospital between January 2008 and December 2014. Patients received docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) IC followed by IMRT alone (IC + RT group) or IMRT plus cisplatin concurrent chemotherapy (IC + CCRT group). The main endpoint was overall survival (OS), which was evaluated by the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to identify potential independent prognostic factors. Treatment-associated toxicities were compared between groups using the Chi squared test.

Results

A total of 78 patients treated with IC + RT and 76 with IC + CCRT were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 59 months (range: 7–108 months). There was no difference between patients treated with IC + RT and IC + CCRT in terms of 3-year OS (89.0% versus 88.0%, p = 0.286), progression-free survival (76.8% versus 80.0%, p = 0.142), locoregional recurrence-free survival (87.1% versus 90.5%, p = 0.156), or distant metastasis-free survival (83.6% versus 82.6%, p = 0.567). Treatment (IC + RT versus IC + CCRT) was not an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 1.425, 95% CI 0.698–2.908; p = 0.331). IC + CCRT was associated with a higher incidence of grade 3–4 neutropenia than IC + RT during radiotherapy (11.8% versus 1.3%, p = 0.020).

Conclusion

IC plus IMRT alone achieves similar patient survival outcomes as IC plus IMRT-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and has a lower incidence of toxicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Sarraf M, LeBlanc M, Giri PG, Fu KK, Cooper J, Vuong T et al (1998) Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: phase III randomized Intergroup study 0099. J Clin Oncol 16(4):1310–1317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard P, Lee A, Marguet S, Leclercq J, Ng WT, Ma J et al (2015) Chemotherapy and radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update of the MAC-NPC meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 16(6):645–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cao CN, Luo JW, Gao L, Yi JL, Huang XD, Wang K et al (2015) Update report of T4 classification nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy: an analysis of survival and treatment toxicities. Oral Oncol 51(2):190–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chua MLK, Wee JTS, Hui EP, Chan ATC (2016) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet 387(10022):1012–1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1471–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hui EP, Ma BB, Leung SF, King AD, Mo F, Kam MK et al (2009) Randomized phase II trial of concurrent cisplatin-radiotherapy with or without neoadjuvant docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 27(2):242–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kam MK, Teo PM, Chau RM, Cheung KY, Choi PH, Kwan WH et al (2004) Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: the Hong Kong experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60(5):1440–1450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kong L, Hu C, Niu X, Zhang Y, Guo Y, Tham IW et al (2013) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: interim results from 2 prospective phase 2 clinical trials. Cancer 119(23):4111–4118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kwong DL, Sham JS, Chua DT, Choy DT, Au GK, Wu PM (1997) The effect of interruptions and prolonged treatment time in radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 39(3):703–710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin S, Lu JJ, Han L, Chen Q, Pan J (2010) Sequential chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the management of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: experience of 370 consecutive cases. BMC Cancer 10:39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mao YP, Xie FY, Liu LZ, Sun Y, Li L, Tang LL et al (2009) Re-evaluation of 6th edition of AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and proposed improvement based on magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73(5):1326–1334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ribassin-Majed L, Marguet S, Lee AWM, Ng WT, Ma J, Chan ATC et al (2017) What Is the best treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma? An individual patient data network meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 35(5):498–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Su S, Chen C, Han F, Zhao C, Xiao W et al (2014) Long-term outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for 868 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an analysis of survival and treatment toxicities. Radiother Oncol 110(3):398–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Li WF, Chen NY, Zhang N, Hu GQ, Xie FY et al (2016) Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 17(11):1509–1520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tham IW, Hee SW, Yeo RM, Salleh PB, Lee J, Tan TW et al (2009) Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma using intensity-modulated radiotherapy-the national cancer centre Singapore experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75(5):1481–1486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65(2):87–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Ding W, Chen C, Niu Z, Pan M, Zhang H (2015) Meta-analysis of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Cancer Res Ther 11(Suppl 2):C191–C195

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wei WI, Sham JS (2005) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet 365(9476):2041–2054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xie R, Xia B, Zhang X, Hu W, Zhao R, Xie C et al (2016) T4/N2 classification nasopharyngeal carcinoma benefit from concurrent chemotherapy in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Oncotarget 7(49):81918–81925

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yi JL, Gao L, Huang XD, Li SY, Luo JW, Cai WM et al (2006) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by radical radiotherapy alone: ten-year experience of a single institution. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65(1):161–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Zhao C, Ghimire B, Hong MH, Liu Q, Zhang Y et al (2010) The role of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma among endemic population: a meta-analysis of the phase III randomized trials. BMC Cancer 10:558

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Shan GP, Li P, Cheng PJ (2015) The role of concurrent chemotherapy to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) after neoadjuvant docetaxel and cisplatin treatment in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Med Oncol 32(3):41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81672386).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xingchen Peng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethics statement

All procedures in this study involving human participants were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the West China Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, Z., Zhang, Z., Luo, J. et al. Induction chemotherapy plus IMRT alone versus induction chemotherapy plus IMRT-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 145, 1857–1864 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-02925-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-02925-z

Keywords

Navigation