Skip to main content
Log in

A retrospective review of diagnosis and treatment modalities of neuroendocrine tumors (excluding primary lung cancer) in 10 oncological institutions of the East German Study Group of Hematology and Oncology (OSHO), 2010–2012

  • Original Article – Clinical Oncology
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

There is a paucity of data on the incidence of neuroendocrine tumors (NET) outside pulmonary primaries and on treatment modalities applied to patients with NET in clinical practice. Only very little therapeutic progress has been made with respect to response and overall survival, particularly among patients with poorly differentiated, WHO grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinomas (G3-NEC). We sought to document the incidence and treatment modalities in patients with NET/NEC within a period of 2 years.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective data analysis using a simple documentation file to be completed in written form or electronically, including localization, WHO grading, treatment modalities, and specific therapeutic regimens applied. Primary lung cancer was excluded. The time period to be covered was 2010 through 2012. Individual patient data such as names or age were not documented, so that no ethics committee approval was required.

Results

Ten different hospital- or practice-based institutions contributed their data. One to 35 patients were documented per institution, summing up to 149 patients with 154 tumor localizations. Midgut (n = 46), foregut (n = 42), hindgut (n = 17), lung (n = 9), bladder (n = 8), unknown primary (n = 11), and other including prostate and liver (n = 21) were documented as tumor sites. Histological gradings were G1 (n = 71), G2 (n = 27), G3 (n = 34), undifferentiated “G4” (n = 4), and not specified (n = 13). Treatment modalities were surgical resection (n = 102), chemotherapy (n = 49), somatostatin analogs (n = 39), radiotherapy (n = 22), receptor-directed radionuclide therapy (n = 12), and systemic tyrosine kinase inhibition (n = 5). Chemotherapy was given to patients not only with G3-NEC (n = 31), but also with G2 (n = 12) and G1 NET (n = 7). Somatostatin analogs as well as receptor-directed radionuclides were applied to patients throughout all gradings.

Conclusions

NET and NEC are not very rare tumor entities, but are diagnosed with very different frequencies, possibly depending upon the alertness of pathologists and clinicians. Chemotherapy, receptor-directed radionuclide application, and somatostatin analog therapy are applied without a clear correlation to different histologic gradings. Diagnostic and therapeutic progress in the field of NETs/carcinomas is urgently needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AJCC (2010) Exocrine and endocrine pancreas. In: Edge SB, Byrd, Compton CC et al (eds) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York, pp 241–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Hainsworth JD, Spigel DR, Litchy S, Greco FA (2006) Phase II trial of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and etoposide in advanced poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma: a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network study. J Clin Oncol 24:3548–3554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klimstra DS, Modlin IR, Adsay NV, Chetty R, Deshpande V, Gönen M, Jensen RT, Kidd M, Kulke MH, Lloyd RV, Moran C, Moss SF, Oberg K, O’Toole D, Rindi G, Robert ME, Suster S, Tang LH, Tzen CY, Washington MK, Wiedenmann B, Yao J (2010) Pathology reporting of neuroendocrine tumors: application of the Delphic consensus process to the development of a minimum pathology data set. Am J Surg Pathol 34:300–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klöppel G, Couvelard A, Perren A, Komminoth P, McNicol AM, Nilsson O, Scarpa A, Scoazec JY, Wiedenmann B, Papotti M, Rindi G, Plöckinger U (2009) ENETS consensus guidelines for the standards of care in neuroendocrine tumors: towards a standardized approach to the diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and their prognostic stratification. Neuroendocrinology 90:162–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitry E, Rougier P (2001) The treatment of undifferentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 37:47–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitry E, Baudin E, Ducreux M, Sabourin JC, Rufié P, Aparicio T, Aparicio T, Lasser P, Elias D, Duvillard P, Schlumberger M, Rougier P (1999) Treatment of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumours with etoposide and cisplatin. Br J Cancer 81:1351–1355

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moertel CG, Kvols LK, O’Connell MJ, Rubin J (1991) Treatment of neuroendocrine carcinomas with combined etoposide and cisplatin. Evidence of major therapeutic activity in the anaplastic variants of these neoplasms. Cancer 68:227–232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (2014) Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: neuroendocrine tumors (Version 1.2015). www.nccn.org. Last access 20 Dec 2014

  • Oberg K, Castellano D (2011) Current knowledge on diagnosis and staging of neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer Metastasis Rev 30(Suppl 1):3–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen IH, Langer SW, Jepsen I, Assens M, Federspil B, Hasselby JP, Hansen CP, Kjaer A, Knigge U (2012a) First-line treatment of patients with disseminated poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas with carboplatin, etoposide, and vincristine: a single institution experience. Acta Oncol 51:97–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen IH, Sorensen JB, Federspil B, Kjaer A, Hansen CP, Knigge U, Langer SW (2012b) Temozolomide as second or third line treatment of patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas. Sci World J 2012:170496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavel M, Baudin E, Couvelard A, Krenning E, Öberg K, Steinmüller T, Anlauf M, Wiedenmann B, Salazar R, Barcelona Consensus Conference participants (2012) ENETS consensus guidelines for the management of patients with liver and other distant metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms of foregut, midgut, hindgut, and unknown primary. Neuroendocrinology 95:157–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ploeckinger U, Kloeppel G, Wiedenmann B, Lohmann R, representatives of 21 German NET Centers (2009) The German NET-registry: an audit on the diagnosis and therapy of neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology 90:349–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramella Munhoz R, de Mendonça Rego JF, de Celis Ferrari AR, Braghiroli MI, Mendonça Bariani G, Hoff PM, Perego Costa F, Flesch Pfiffer TE, Riechelmann R (2013) Combination of irinotecan and a platinum agent for poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Rare Tumors 5:e39

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rindi G, Wiedenmann B (2011) Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gut and pancreas: new insights. Nat Rev Endocrinol 8:54–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rindi G, Klöppel G, Alhman H, Caplin M, Couvelard A, de Herder WW, Erikssson B, Falchetti A, Falconi M, Komminoth P, Körner M, Lopes JM, McNicol AM, Nilsson O, Perren A, Scarpa A, Scoazec JY, Wiedenmann B, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) (2006) TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 449:395–401

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rindi G, Klöppel G, Couvelard A, Komminoth P, Körner M, Lopes JM, McNicol AM, Nilsson O, Perren A, Scarpa A, Scoazec JY, Wiedenmann B (2007) TNM staging of midgut and hindgut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 451:757–762

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J, Reidy-Langunes D (2013) The management of extrapulmonary poorly differentiated (high-grade) neuroendocrine carcinomas. Semin Oncol 40:100–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sorbye H, Welin S, Langer SW, Vestermark LW, Holt N, Osterlund P, Dueland S, Hofsli E, Guren MG, Ohrling K, Birkemeyer E, Thiis-Evensen E, Biagini M, Gronbaek H, Soveri LM, Olsen IH, Federspiel B, Assmus J, Janson ET, Knigge U (2013) Predictive and prognostic factors for treatment and survival in 305 patients with advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (WHO G3): the NORDIC NEC study. Ann Oncol 24:152–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strosberg JR, Coppola D, Klimstra DS, Phan AT, Kulke MH, Wiseman GA, Kvols LK (2010) The NANETS consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of poorly differentiated (high-grade) extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas. Pancreas 39:799–800

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welin S, Sorbye H, Sebjornsen S, Knappskog S, Busch C, Oberg K (2011) Clinical effect of temozolomide-based chemotherapy in poorly differentiated endocrine carcinoma after progression on first-line chemotherapy. Cancer 117:4617–4622

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, Dagohoy C, Leary C, Mares JE, Abdalla EK, Fleming JB, Vauthey JN, Rashid A, Evans DB (2008) One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol 26:3063–3072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yao JC, Lombard-Bohas C, Baudin E, Kvols LK, Rougier P, Ruszniewski P, Hoosen S, St Peter J, Haas T, Lebwohl D, Van Cutsem E, Kulke MH, Hobday TJ, O’Dorisio TM, Shah MH, Cadiot G, Luppi G, Posey JA, Wiedenmann B (2010) Daily oral everolimus activity in patients with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after failure of cytotoxic chemotherapy: a phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 28:69–76

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Simone Wendt (Potsdam) and Rainer Krahl (Leipzig) for providing excellent data management.

Conflict of interest

All co-authors have no conflicts of interest with respect to this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Maschmeyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maschmeyer, G., Mügge, LO., Kämpfe, D. et al. A retrospective review of diagnosis and treatment modalities of neuroendocrine tumors (excluding primary lung cancer) in 10 oncological institutions of the East German Study Group of Hematology and Oncology (OSHO), 2010–2012. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 141, 1639–1644 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-015-1954-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-015-1954-x

Keywords

Navigation