Abstract
Purpose
A high percentage of cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). The aim of our study was to learn more about the association of CAM usage, information needs, perceived impact of disease, locus of control and self-efficacy of cancer patients.
Methods
We asked patients attending a series of lectures on CAM using a standardized questionnaire which integrated questions on information needs, CAM and validated short questionnaires on self-efficacy, perception of the disease and locus of control of reinforcement.
Results
One hundred and eighty-five patients answered the questionnaire, from whom 45 % used CAM. Sixty percentage disclosed using CAM to the general practitioner and 57 % to the oncologist. Physicians and nurses, print media and the Internet are the most important source of information on CAM (used by 20–25 % each). Impact on neither daily life, perceived personal control nor coherence was associated with CAM usage, disclosure to physicians or sources of information. There also was no association between CAM usage and self-efficacy. In contrast, there was a significant association between CAM user rate and a high external locus of control.
Conclusion
While CAM usage is agreed upon by many physicians due to the idea that it helps patients to become active and feel more in control of the disease, our data are in favor of the contrary. A strong perception of external locus of control seems to be a driver of CAM usage. Physicians should be aware of this association when counseling on CAM.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J (2006) The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res 60:631–637
Hinz A, Schumacher J, Albani C, Schmid G, Brähler E (2006) Bevölkerungsrepräsentative Normierung der Skala zur Allgemeinen Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung. Diagnostica 52(1):26–31
Horneber M, Bueschel G, Dennert G, Less D, Ritter E, Zwahlen M (2012) How many cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Integr Cancer Ther 11(3):187–203
http://www.gesis.org/kurzskalen-psychologischer-merkmale/kurzskalen/. Accessed 09 Dec 2013
http://www.gesis.org/kurzskalen-psychologischer-merkmale/kurzskalen/. Accessed 14 Dec 2013
http://www.gesis.org/uploads/media/ASKU_Workingpaper_01.pdf. Accessed 09 Dec 2013
http://www.gesis.org/uploads/media/IE4_Workingpaper.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2013
http://www.uib.no/ipq/html/b-ipq.html. Accessed 14 Dec 2013
Huebner J, Muenstedt K, Muecke R, Micke O, Stoll C, Kleeberg UR, Buentzel J, Dennert G, Prott FJ (2013) Counseling cancer patients on complementary and alternative medicine. Strahlenther Onkol 189(8):613–617
Huebner J, Micke O, Muecke R, Buentzel J, Prott FJ, Kleeberg UR, Davey B, Senf B, Muenstedt K (2014a) User rate of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) of patients visiting a counseling facility for CAM of a German comprehensive cancer center. Anticancer Res 34:943–949
Huebner J, Muenstedt K, Prott FJ, Stoll C, Micke O, Buentzel J, Muecke R, Senf B (2014b) Online survey of patients with breast cancer on complementary and alternative medicine. Breast Care 9(1):60–63
Huebner J, Prott FJ, Micke O, Muecke R, Senf B, Dennert G, Muenstedt K (2014c) Online survey of cancer patients on complementary and alternative medicine. Oncol Res Treat 37:304–308
Micke O, Bruns F, Glatzel M, Schoenekaes K, Micke P, Muecke R, Buentzel J (2009) Predictive factors for the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in radiation oncology. Eur J Integr Med 1:22–30
Muenstedt K, Kirsch K, Milch W, Sachsse S, Vahrson H (1996) Unconventional cancer therapy-survey of patients with gynaecological malignancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 258(2):81–88
Muenstedt K, Duetemeyer V, Huebner J (2013) Patients’ considerations behind the use of methods from complementary and alternative medicine in the field of obstetrics in Germany. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288(3):527–530
Paul M, Davey B, Senf B, Stoll C, Muenstedt K, Muecke R, Micke O, Prott FJ, Buentzel J, Huebner J (2013) Patients with advanced cancer and their usage of complementary and alternative medicine. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 130(9):1515–1522
Robinson A, McGrail MR (2004) Disclosure of CAM use to medical practitioners: a review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Complement Ther. Med 12(2-3):90–98
Saxe GA, Madlensky L, Kealey S, Wu DP, Freeman KL, Pierce JP (2008) Disclosure to physicians of CAM use by breast cancer patients: findings from the women‘s healthy eating and living study. Integr Cancer Ther 7(3):122–127
Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M (1995) Generalized self-efficacy SCALE. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M (eds) Measures in health psychology: a user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. NFER-Nelson, Windsor, pp 35–37
Trimborn A, Senf B, Muenstedt K, Buentzel J, Muecke R, Prott FJ, Wicker S, Huebner J (2013) Attitude of employees of a university clinic to complementary and alternative medicine in oncology. Ann Oncol 24(10):2641–2645
Zeller T, Muenstedt K, Stoll C, Schweder J, Senf B, Ruckhaeberle E, Becker S, Serve H, Huebner J (2013) Potential interactions of complementary and alternative medicine with cancer therapy in outpatients with gynecological cancer in a comprehensive cancer center. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 139:357–365
Conflict of interest
A. Hoppe is an employee of the Techniker Krankenkasse, which sponsored the lectures. The lectures were given by J. Huebner, who did receive travel grants but no fees for the lectures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
On behalf of the working group Prevention and Integrative Oncology of the German Cancer Society.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ebel, MD., Rudolph, I., Keinki, C. et al. Perception of cancer patients of their disease, self-efficacy and locus of control and usage of complementary and alternative medicine. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 141, 1449–1455 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-015-1940-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-015-1940-3