Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Challenging a dogma: co-mutations exist in MAPK pathway genes in colorectal cancer

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sequencing of genes encoding mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway proteins in colorectal cancer (CRC) has established as dogma that of the genes in a pathway only a single one is ever mutated. We searched for cases with a mutation in more than one MAPK pathway gene (co-mutations). Tumor tissue samples of all patients presenting with CRC, and referred between 01/01/2008 and 01/06/2015 to three French cancer centers for determination of mutation status of RAS/RAF+/−PIK3CA, were retrospectively screened for co-mutations using Sanger sequencing or next-generation sequencing. We found that of 1791 colorectal patients with mutations in the MAPK pathway, 20 had a co-mutation, 8 of KRAS/NRAS, and some even with a third mutation. More than half of the mutations were in codons 12 and 13. We also found 3 cases with a co-mutation of NRAS/BRAF and 9 with a co-mutation of KRAS/BRAF. In 2 patients with a co-mutation of KRAS/NRAS, the co-mutation existed in the primary as well as in a metastasis, which suggests that co-mutations occur early during carcinogenesis and are maintained when a tumor disseminates. We conclude that co-mutations exist in the MAPK genes but with low frequency and as yet with unknown outcome implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Rajagopalan H, Bardelli A, Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE (2002) Tumorigenesis: RAF/RAS oncogenes and mismatch-repair status. Nature 418:934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Italiano A, Hostein I, Soubeyran I, Fabas T, Benchimol D, Evrard S, Gugenheim J, Becouarn Y, Brunet R, Fonck M, François E, Saint-Paul MC, Pedeutour F (2010) KRAS and BRAF mutational status in primary colorectal tumors and related metastatic sites: biological and clinical implications. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1429–1434. doi:10.1245/s10434-009-0864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Piton N, Lonchamp E, Nowak F, Sabourin JC, KRAS group (2015) Real life distribution of KRAS and NRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal carcinoma from French routine genotyping. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 24:1416–1418. doi:10.1158/1055-9965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Oliveira C, Velho S, Moutinho C, Ferreira A, Preto A, Domingo E, Capelinha AF, Duval A, Hamelin R, Machado JC, Schwartz S Jr, Carneiro F, Seruca R (2007) KRAS and BRAF oncogenic mutations in MSS colorectal carcinoma progression. Oncogene 26:158–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vagaja NN, Parry J, McCallum D, McCallum D, Thomas MA, Bentel JM (2015) Are all RAS mutations the same? Coexisting KRAS and NRAS mutations in a caecal adenocarcinoma and contiguous tubulovillous adenoma. J Clin Pathol 68:657–660. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2015-202969

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC (2009) Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc 4:1073–1081. doi:10.1038/nprot.2009.86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, et al. (2010) A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 7:248–249. doi:10.1038/nmeth0410-248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Frampton GM, Fichtenholtz A, Otto GA, Wang K, Downing SR, He J, et al. (2013) Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 31:1023–1031. doi:10.1038/nbt.2696

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Seth R, Crook S, Ibrahem S, Fadhil W, Jackson D, Ilyas M (2009) Concomitant mutations and splice variants in KRAS and BRAF demonstrate complex perturbation of the Ras/Raf signalling pathway in advanced colorectal cancer. Gut 58:1234–1241. doi:10.1136/gut.2008.159137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sahin IH, Kazmi SM, Yorio JT, Bhadkamkar NA, Kee BK, Garrett CR (2013) Rare though not mutually exclusive: a report of three cases of concomitant KRAS and BRAF mutation and a review of the literature. J Cancer 4:320–322. doi:10.7150/jca.3619

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. De Roock W, Claes B, Bernasconi D, De Schutter J, Biesmans B, Fountzilas G, Kalogeras KT, Kotoula V, Papamichael D, Laurent-Puig P, et al. (2010) Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. Lancet Oncol 11:753–762. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70130-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sorich MJ, Wiese MD, Rowland A, Kichenadasse G, McKinnon RA, Karapetis CS (2015) Extended RAS mutations and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody survival benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Ann Oncol 26:13–21. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haigis KM, Kendall KR, Wang Y, Cheung A, Haigis MC, Glickman JN, Niwa-Kawakita M, Sweet-Cordero A, Sebolt-Leopold J, Shannon KM, Settleman J, Giovannini M, Jacks T (2008) Differential effects of oncogenic K-Ras and N-Ras on proliferation, differentiation and tumor progression in the colon. Nat Genet 40:600–608. doi:10.1038/ng.115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Ravi Nookala of Institut Bergonié for medical writing service.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Grellety.

Ethics declarations

The present study was approved by the local ethics committee.

Funding

This study was funded by the Institut Bergonié Comprehensive Cancer Center Institution.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grellety, T., Gros, A., Pedeutour, F. et al. Challenging a dogma: co-mutations exist in MAPK pathway genes in colorectal cancer. Virchows Arch 469, 459–464 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-016-1991-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-016-1991-0

Keywords

Navigation