Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of retinal detachment surgery outcome among patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy with and without relaxing retinotomy

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this four year retrospective study was to compare the anatomical and functional outcomes of complicated retinal detachment (RD) surgery by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with and without retinotomy. The main outcome measures were primary anatomical success (defined as retinal re-attachment at the final follow-up after a single operation, with or without silicone in situ), final anatomical success, final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and postoperative complications. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups, although there was a borderline significant trend for the retinotomy group to be associated with worse pre-surgical ocular pathology. With a mean follow-up of 18 (±7.8) months, primary anatomical success was achieved in 76.7% (33 of 43) of the retinotomy group eyes vs. 67.8% (40 of 59) of the eyes in the group without retinotomy. Final anatomical success rates for the retinotomy group and no retinotomy group were 100 and 93.2% respectively. The final BCVA was 1.57 LogMAR with retinotomy and 1.38 without retinotomy, an improvement in both groups. The incidence of postoperative complications was similar in the two groups, while the frequency of macular holes was higher in the retinotomy group. A similar degree of improvement in BCVA following both surgeries indicates their similar efficacy and justifies their performance even in complicated eyes in order to improve the patients’ quality of life. With neither approach superior to the other, the choice of method should be left to the surgeon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwartz SG, Flynn HW Jr, Mieler WF (2013) Update on retinal detachment surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 24(3):255–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schneider EW, Geraets RL, Johnson MW (2012) Pars plana vitrectomy without adjuvant procedures for repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 32(2):213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmidt JC, Rodrigues EB, Hoerle S, Meyer CH, Kroll P (2003) Primary vitrectomy in complicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment–a survey of 205 eyes. Ophthalmologica 217(6):387–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sodhi A, Leung LS, Do DV, Gower EW, Schein OD, Handa JT (2008) Recent trends in the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Surv Ophthalmol 53(1):50–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Machemer R (1981) Retinotomy. Am J Ophthalmol 92(6):768–774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sheng Y, Sun W, Mo B, Yu YJ, Gu YS, Liu W (2012) Non-buckled vitrectomy for retinal detachment with inferior breaks and proliferative vitreoretinophathy. Int J Ophthalmol 5(5):591–595

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tseng JJ, Barile GR, Schiff WM, Akar Y, Vidne-Hay O, Chang S (2005) Influence of relaxing retinotomy on surgical outcomes in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 140(4):628–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tan HS, Mura M, Oberstein SY, de Smet MD (2010) Primary retinectomy in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 149(3):447–452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Quiram PA, Gonzales CR, Hu W, Gupta A, Yoshizumi MO, Kreiger AE et al (2006) Outcomes of vitrectomy with inferior retinectomy in patients with recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachments and proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmology 113(11):2041–2047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shalaby KA (2010) Relaxing retinotomies and retinectomies in the management of retinal detachment with severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). Clin Ophthalmol 4:1107–1114

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grigoropoulos VG, Benson S, Bunce C, Charteris DG (2007) Functional outcome and prognostic factors in 304 eyes managed by retinectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245(5):641–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. de Silva DJ, Kwan A, Bunce C, Bainbridge J (2008) Predicting visual outcome following retinectomy for retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol 92(7):954–958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Holladay JT (1997) Proper method for calculating average visual acuity. J Refract Surg 13(4):388–391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schulze-Bonsel K, Feltgen N, Burau H, Hansen L, Bach M (2006) Visual acuities “hand motion” and “counting fingers” can be quantified with the freiburg visual acuity test. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(3):1236–1240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moisseiev E, Ohana O, Gershovitch L, Barak A (2013) Visual prognosis and complications following silicone oil removal. Eur J Ophthalmol 23(2):236–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kolomeyer AM, Grigorian RA, Mostafavi D, Bhagat N, Zarbin MA (2011) 360 degrees retinectomy for the treatment of complex retinal detachment. Retina 31(2):266–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kinori M, Moisseiev E, Shoshany N, Fabian ID, Skaat A, Barak A et al (2011) Comparison of pars plana vitrectomy with and without scleral buckle for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 152(2):291.e2–297.e2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsui I, Schubert HD (2009) Retinotomy and silicone oil for detachments complicated by anterior inferior proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 93(9):1228–1233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Garnier S, Rahmi A, Grasswil C, Kodjikian L (2013) Three hundred and sixty degree retinotomy for retinal detachments with severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251:2081–2085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lam RF, Cheung BT, Yuen CY, Wong D, Lam DS, Lai WW (2008) Retinal redetachment after silicone oil removal in proliferative vitreoretinopathy: a prognostic factor analysis. Am J Ophthalmol 145(3):527–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tan HS, Dell’omo R, Mura M (2012) Silicone oil removal after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: comparing techniques. Eye (Lond) 26(3):444–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Arevalo JF, Lasave AF, Torres F, Suarez E (2012) Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment after LASIK for myopia of up to −10 diopters: 10 years of follow-up. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 250(7):963–970

  23. Brown GC, Brown MM, Sharma S, Busbee B, Landy J (2002) A cost-utility analysis of interventions for severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 133(3):365–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adiel Barak.

Additional information

This work was performed in partial fulfillment of the M.D. thesis requirements of Dr. Tal Frenkel in Sackle Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frenkel, T., Moisseiev, E., Neudorfer, M. et al. Comparison of retinal detachment surgery outcome among patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy with and without relaxing retinotomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253, 855–864 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-014-2778-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-014-2778-0

Keywords

Navigation