Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the effect of optic nerve head drusen (ONHD) on the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) using Cirrus optical coherence tomography (OCT).
Methods
Fifty-seven eyes of thirty patients with ONHD and thirty-eight eyes of twenty age-matched and sex-matched control subjects underwent circumpapillary and macular scanning using Cirrus OCT. The percentages of eyes with abnormal GCIPL and RNFL values according to the Cirrus normative data were analysed and compared.
Results
Overall, eyes with ONHD showed abnormally reduced values for average and minimum GCIPL thicknesses in 35 % and 45 % of cases compared to 2 % for both values in control eyes (P < 0.001). Average RNFL thickness comparison between eyes with ONHD and normal eyes revealed abnormal thinning in 33 % vs. 0 %, respectively (p = 0.002). The percentage of abnormal thinning increased with higher grades of ONHD for all the parameters evaluated, so that in grade III drusen, values were abnormally reduced in 80 % of eyes in all three analyses. Regarding buried ONHD, 30 % and 4 % of eyes had an abnormally reduced minimum GCIPL and average RNFL thickness, respectively. Furthermore, 26 % of these eyes had abnormal GCIPL exams with a normal or increased RNFL thickness.
Conclusions
Both RNFL and GCIPL analysis reveal significant thinning in eyes with ONHD directly correlated with drusen severity. In buried ONHD, the abnormality rate was significantly higher with GCIPL compared to RNFL evaluation, suggesting that GCIPL analysis might be an early structural indicator of neuronal loss in the setting of thickened RNFL.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lorentzen SE (1966) Drusen of the optic disk. A clinical and genetic study. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 90:1–180
Reese AB (1940) Relation of drusen of the optic nerve to tuberous sclerosis. Arch Ophthalmol 24:187–205
Friedman AH, Gartner S, Modi SS (1975) Drusen of the optic disc. A retrospective study in cadaver eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 59:413–421
Wirtschafter JD (1983) Optic nerve axons and acquired alterations in the appearance of the optic disc. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 81:1034–1091
Savino PJ, Glaser JS, Rosenberg MA (1979) A clinical analysis of pseudopapilledema. II. Visual field defects. Arch Ophthalmol 97:71–75
Noval S, Visa J, Contreras I (2013) Visual field defects due to optic disk drusen in children. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251:2445–2450
Lansche RK, Rucker CW (1957) Progression of defects in visual fields produced by hyaline bodies in optic discs. Arch Ophthalmol 58:115–121
Mustonen E, Nieminen H (1982) Optic disc drusen a photographic study. II. Retinal nerve fibre layer photography. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 60:859–872
Choi SS, Zawadzki RJ, Greiner MA, Werner JS, Keltner JL (2008) Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and adaptive optics reveal nerve fiber layer loss and photoreceptor changes in a patient with optic nerve drusen. J Neuroophthalmol 28:120–125
Gili P, Flores-Rodríguez P, Martin-Ríos MD, Carrasco Font C (2013) Anatomical and functional impairment of the nerve fiber layer in patients with optic nerve head drusen. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251:2421–2428
Roh S, Noecker RJ, Schuman JS, Hedges TR 3rd, Weiter JJ, Mattox C (1998) Effect of optic nerve head drusen on nerve fiber layer thickness. Ophthalmology 105:878–885
Schuman JS, Hee MR, Puliafito CA et al (1995) Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 113:586–596
Kotowski J, Folio LS, Wollstein G et al (2012) Glaucoma discrimination of segmented cirrus spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) macular scans. Br J Ophthalmol 96:1420–1425
Saidha S, Syc SB, Durbin MK et al (2011) Visual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis correlates better with optical coherence tomography derived estimates of macular ganglion cell layer thickness than peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Mult Scler 17:1449–1463
Kardon RH (2011) Role of the macular optical coherence tomography scan in neuro-ophthalmology. J Neuroophthalmol 31:353–361
Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS (1988) Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 44:1049–1060
Fan Q, Teo YY, Saw SM (2011) Application of advanced statistics in ophthalmology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:6059–6065
Lancaster G, Dodd S, Williamson P (2002) Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract 10:307–312
Pilat AV, Proudlock FA, Kumar P, Lee H, Papageorgiou E, Gottlob I (2014) Macular morphology in patients with optic nerve head drusen and optic disc edema. Ophthalmology 121:552–557
Katz BJ, Pomeranz HD (2006) Visual field defects and retinal nerve fiber layer defects in eyes with buried optic nerve drusen. Am J Ophthalmol 141:248–253
Lee KM, Woo SJ, Hwang JM (2011) Differentiation of optic nerve head drusen and optic disc edema with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 118:971–977
Mwanza JC, Budenz DL, Godfrey DG, Neelakantan A, Sayyad FE, Chang RT, Lee RK (2014) Diagnostic performance of optical coherence tomography ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness measurements in early glaucoma. Ophthalmology 121:849–854
Ratchford JN, Saidha S, Sotirchos ES et al (2013) Active MS is associated with accelerated retinal ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer thinning. Neurology 80:47–54
Syc SB, Saidha S, Newsome SD et al (2012) Optical coherence tomography segmentation reveals ganglion cell layer pathology after optic neuritis. Brain 135:521–533
Quigley HA, Addicks EM (1982) Quantitative studies of retinal nerve fiber layer defects. Arch Ophthalmol 100:807–814
Quigley HA, Miller NR, George T (1980) Clinical evaluation of nerve fiber layer atrophy as an indicator of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Arch Ophthalmol 98:1564–1571
Mustonen E (1983) Pseudopapilloedema with and without verified optic disc drusen. A clinical analysis II: visual fields. Acta Ophthalmol 61:1057–1066
Lee AG, Zimmerman MB (2005) The rate of visual field loss in optic nerve head drusen. Am J Ophthalmol 139:1062–1066
Wilkins JM, Pomeranz HD (2004) Visual manifestations of visible and buried optic disc drusen. J Neuroophthalmol 24:125–129
Roh S, Noecker RJ, Schuman JS (1997) Evaluation of coexisting optic nerve head drusen and glaucoma with optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 104:1138–1144
Mamikonian VR, Galoian NS, Sheremet NL et al (2013) Differentiation of concomitant glaucomatous optic neuropathy in optic disc drusen. Vestn Oftalmol 129:68–72
Bernardczyk-Meller J, Wasilewicz R, Pecold-Stepniewska H, Wasiewicz-Rager J (2006) OCT and PVEP examination in eyes with visible idiopathic optic disc drusen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 223:993–996
Ocakoglu O, Ustundag C, Koyluoglu N et al (2003) Long term follow-up of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in eyes with optic nerve head drusen. Curr Eye Res 26:277–280
Tatlipinar S, Kadayifçilar S, Bozkurt B et al (2001) Polarimetric nerve fiber analysis in patients with visible optic nerve head drusen. J Neuroophthalmol 21:245–249
Mwanza JC, Durbin MK, Budenz DL et al (2011) Profile and predictors of normal ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness measured with frequency-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:7872–7879
Conflict of interest
None.
Funding/Support
None.
Financial disclosures
None.
Author contributions
Design and conduct of the study (AC, GR); collection (AC, LG, ML, NO), management (AC, GR, FJMN), analysis (AC, GR, FJMN), and interpretation of the data (AC, GR, FJMN); and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript (AC, GR, IC, FJMN).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Casado, A., Rebolleda, G., Guerrero, L. et al. Measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer and macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in patients with optic nerve head drusen. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 252, 1653–1660 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-014-2773-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-014-2773-5