Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The comparison of the quality of life and intranasal edema between the patients with or without nasal packing after septoplasty

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Septoplasty is one of the most common operations performed in otolaryngology and anterior nasal packing is done routinely to prevent postoperative bleeding, septal hematoma or nasal synechia. Currently, transseptal sutures have gained a broader application area, not only for preventing the complications such as septal hematoma and bleeding but also closing any accidental tears of septal mucosa and providing additional support for the cartilage pieces retained in septoplasty. We evaluated the quality of life of the patients in early postoperative period (in the first postoperative week), intranasal edema with endoscopic examination and the intranasal changes with acoustic rhinometry. We performed a prospective and randomized study with patients undergoing septoplasty without inferior turbinectomy. As packing material, there were two groups: in group A, gauze in a glove finger and in group B, Doyle splint were used, and in the additional group C, only transseptal suture with 4/0 vicryl among the cartilaginous septum was performed. The patients were invited to control examinations on the postoperative 2nd, 4th and 7th days to evaluate the scores from 1 to 5 on the questionnaire for the pain, nasal fullness, sneezing, epiphora, difficulty in swallowing and sleep disturbances. The patients were also administered an endoscopic nasal examination for the purpose of detecting the intranasal edema, and acoustic rhinometry was performed during the control examinations to detect the intranasal changes. Total occluding packing was found to cause much more frequent and higher scores of epiphora, sneezing, difficulty in swallowing, but mainly, the pain compared to in silicone packing with airway and transseptal suture only. Although the silicone packing with airway was found to be much more comfortable, it also led to sneezing and epiphora. The patients without nasal packing had more comfortable period especially in the early postoperative days (the first 4 days). However, 1 week after surgery, groups with and without nasal packing were found to be equalized on behalf of the objective and subjective parameters. As any complication was not observed due to not using nasal packing, it is thought that nasal packing usage following septoplasty is not a necessity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernardo MT, Alves S, Lima NB, Helena D, Condé A (2013) Septoplasty with or without postoperative nasal packing? Prospective study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 79(4):471–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Basavaraj N, Walikar S, Rashinkar MS, Kakkeri A (2011) A comparative study of septoplasty with or without nasal packing. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 63(3):247–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gunaydin RO, Aygenc E, Karakullukcu S, Fidan F, Celikkanat S (2011) Nasal packing and transseptal suturing techniques: surgical and anaesthetic perspectives. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268(8):1151–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ardehali MM, Bastaninejad S (2009) Use of nasal packs and intranasal septal splints following septoplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38(10):1022–1024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Acıoğlu E, Edizer DT, Yiğit Ö, Onur F, Alkan Z (2012) Nasal septal packing: which one? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(7):1777–1781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gioacchini FM, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Kaleci S, Magliulo G, Re M (2014) The role of antibiotic therapy and nasal packing in septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271(5):879–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cayonu M, Acar A, Horasanlı E, Altundag A, Salihoglu M (2014) Comparison of totally occlusive nasal pack, internal nasal splint, and transseptal suture technique after septoplasty in terms of immediate respiratory distress related to anesthesia and surgical complications. Acta Otolaryngol 134(4):390–394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cukurova I, Cetinkaya EA, Mercan GC, Demirhan E, Gumussoy M (2012) Retrospective analysis of 697 septoplasty surgery cases: packing versus trans-septal suturing method. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 32(2):111–114

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ogretmenoglu O, Yilmaz T, Rahimi K, Aksöyek S (2002) The effect on arterial blood gases and heart rate of bilateral nasal packing. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 259(2):63–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fairbanks DN (1986) Complications of nasal packing. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 94(3):412–415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Korkut AY, Erkalp K, Erden V, Teker AM, Demirel A, Gedikli O, Saidoglu L (2010) Effect of pharyngeal packing during nasal surgery on postoperative nausea and vomiting. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 143(6):831–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Naghibzadeh B, Peyvandi AA, Naghibzadeh G (2011) Does post septoplasty nasal packing reduce complications? Acta Med Iran 49(1):9–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weber R, Keerl R, Hochapfel F, Draf W, Toffel PH (2001) Packing in endonasal surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 22(5):306–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tomori Z, Widdicombe JG (1969) Muscular, bronchomotor and cardiovascular reflexes elicited by mechanical stimulation of the respiratory tract. J Physiol 200(1):25–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Kayahan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Each of the authors declares that there is not any conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This research was approved by Hacettepe University Ethics Board (No. 2014/06-06, KA-14021).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kayahan, B., Ozer, S., Suslu, A.E. et al. The comparison of the quality of life and intranasal edema between the patients with or without nasal packing after septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274, 1551–1555 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4403-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4403-9

Keywords

Navigation