Abstract
To investigate the surgical and audiological outcomes of an installation of a bone-anchored hearing system (BAHS) procedure without tissue reduction using Ponto implants and abutments. Retrospective consecutive case series. Forty-nine patients, 18 years or older and eligible for treatment with a bone-anchored hearing system with tissue preservation surgery, were included in the study. Following a systematic scheme for medical outcomes, we collected the data regarding surgical intervention, quality of life (GBI), skin and soft tissue reactions (Holgers grading system), pain and numbness (VAS). Hearing performance (aided thresholds and speech recognition in noise) was recorded in 20 patients. No implants were lost, skin, and soft tissue reactions were mild in 96 % of the all visits. Quality of life (GBI) generally improved in the aided condition compared to prior to implantation. Audiologically, 100 % of the 20 patients examined showed improvement of speech reception and sound field thresholds comparing aided to unaided. An average improvement of 33 dB on PTA was recorded. The study, presenting data on a large population, treated with tissue preservation and modern titanium implants, shows that this treatment is a viable solution that results in fewer complications, high degree of predictability and good audiological results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tjellstrom A, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Albrektsson T, Branemark PI (1981) Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 2(4):304–310
Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Proops DW, Wolfaardt JF, Hodgetts WE, Somers T, Niparko JK, Wazen JJ, Sterkers O, Cremers CW, Tjellstrom A (2005) Consensus statements on the BAHA system: where do we stand at present? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 195:2–12
Dun CA, Faber HT, de Wolf MJ, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW, Hol MK (2012) Assessment of more than 1,000 implanted percutaneous bone conduction devices: skin reactions and implant survival. Otol Neurotol 33(2):192–198. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e318241c0bf
Kiringoda R, Lustig LR (2013) A meta-analysis of the complications associated with osseointegrated hearing aids. Otol Neurotol 34(5):790–794. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e318291c651
von Recum AF (1984) Applications and failure modes of percutaneous devices: a review. J Biomed Mater Res 18(4):323–335. doi:10.1002/jbm.820180403
Holgers KM (1994) Soft tissue reactions around clinical skin-penetrating titanium implants. Göteborg, ISBN: 91-628-1334-X
Hultcrantz M (2011) Outcome of the bone-anchored hearing aid procedure without skin thinning: a prospective clinical trial. Otol Neurotol 32(7):1134–1139. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822a1c47
Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG (1996) Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105(6):415–422
Nelissen RC, den Besten CA, Mylanus EAM, Hol MKS (2016) Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(1):105–111. doi:10.1007/s00405-015-3593-x
Olsen SØ, Glad H, Nielsen LH (2011) Comparison of two bone anchored hearing instruments: BP100 and Ponto Pro. Int J Audiol 50(12):920–928. doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.605806
Dun CA, de Wolf MJ, Hol MK, Wigren S, Eeg-Olofsson M, Green K, Karlsmo A, Flynn MC, Stalfors J, Rothera M, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW (2011) Stability, survival, and tolerability of a novel baha implant system: six-month data from a multicenter clinical investigation. Otol Neurotol 32(6):1001–1007. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182267e9c
Waze JJ, Babu S, Daugherty J, Metrailer A (2016) Three-week loading of the 4.5 mm wide titanium implant in bone anchored hearing systems. Am J Otolaryngol 37(2):132–135. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2015.08.005
Singam S, Williams R, Saxby C, Houlihan FP (2014) Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery without soft-tissue reduction: up to 42 months of follow-up. Otol Neurotol 35(9):1596–1600. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000522
Hultcrantz M (2015) Stability testing of a wide bone-anchored device after surgery without skin thinning. BioMed Res Int 2015:853072. doi:10.1155/2015/853072
Høgsbro M, Agger A, Johansen LV (2015) Bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: randomized trial of dermatome versus linear incision without soft tissue reduction—clinical measures. Otol Neurotol 36(5):805–811. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000731
Lustig LR, Arts HA, Brackmann DE, Francis HF, Molony T, Megerian CA, Moore GF, Moore KM, Morrow T, Potsic W, Rubenstein JT, Srireddy S, Syms CA 3rd, Takahashi G, Vernick D, Wackym PA, Niparko JK (2001) Hearing rehabilitation using the BAHA bone-anchored hearing aid: results in 40 patients. Otol Neurotol 22(3):328–334
Wazen JJ, Caruso M, Tjellstrom A (1998) Long-term results with the titanium bone-anchored hearing aid: the US experience. Am J Otol 19(6):737–741
Liepert DR, DiToppa JC (1994) The Nobelpharma auditory system bone-anchored hearing aid: the Edmonton experience. J Otolaryngol 23(6):411–418
Nelissen RC, den Besten CA, Mylanus EAM, Hol MKS (2015) Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(1):105–111. doi:10.1007/s00405-015-3593-X
Arunachalam PS, Kilby D, Meikle D, Davison T, Johnson IJ (2001) Bone-anchored hearing aid quality of life assessed by Glasgow Benefit Inventory. The Laryngoscope 111(7):1260–1263. doi:10.1097/00005537-200107000-00022
McLarnon CM, Davison T, Johnson IJ (2004) Bone-anchored hearing aid: comparison of benefit by patient subgroups. Laryngoscope 114(5):942–944. doi:10.1097/00005537-200405000-00030
de Wolf MJ, Hol MK, Mylanus EA, Snik AF, Cremers CW (2011) Benefit and quality of life after bone-anchored hearing aid fitting in children with unilateral or bilateral hearing impairment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137(2):130–138. doi:10.1001/archoto.2010.252
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caruso, A., Giannuzzi, A.L., Sozzi, V. et al. Bone anchored hearing implants without skin thinning: the Gruppo Otologico surgical and audiological experience. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274, 695–700 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4305-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4305-x