Abstract
Our objective is to evaluate the incidence of unexpected pathologies in routine nasal polyposis specimens and necessity for histopathological evaluation of nasal polyps. A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent nasal polyposis surgery between January 2004 and June 2010 were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of patients with bilateral nasal polyposis. Group 2 consisted of patients with unilateral nasal polyposis. One hundred and seventeen patients (81 male, 36 female) were involved in this study. The mean age was 44.9 ± 17.7 years, ranging between 18 and 72 years. Group 1 consisted of bilateral nasal polyposis specimens. Eighty-five patients were identified with bilateral nasal polyposis. From these 85 patients, no specimens present any evidence of occult pathology on histopathological examination. Group 2 consisted of unilateral nasal polyposis specimens. There were two cases of allergic fungal sinusitis, two of inverting papilloma, one of mucocele, one of plasmacytoma, one of hemangioma, one of esthesioneuroblastoma, and one of schwannoma. Final histopathology of the remaining 23 patients was consistent with inflammation and/or nasal polyposis. We think that in cases of unilateral polyps histopathological examination of the entire material is mandatory. However, routine histological examination of bilateral nasal polyposis may possibly not be necessary in cases where the clinical assessment very clearly has not disclosed any unusual or suspicious signs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rinia AB, Kostamo K, Ebbens FA, van Drunen CM, Fokkens WJ (2007) Nasal polyposis: a cellular-based approach to answering questions. Allergy 62:348–358
Tritt S, McMains KC, Kountakis SE (2008) Unilateral nasal polyposis: clinical presentation and pathology. Am J Otolaryngol 29:230–232
Slavin RG (1997) Nasal polyps and sinusitis. JAMA 278:1849–1854
Yaman H, Yilmaz S, Karali E, Guclu E, Ozturk O (2010) Evaluation and management of antrochoanal polyps. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 3:110–114
Bonfils P (2007) Evaluation of the combined medical and surgical treatment in nasal polyposis. I: functional results. Acta Otolaryngol 127:436–446
Kale SU, Mohite U, Rowlands D, Drake-Lee AB (2001) Clinical and histopathological correlation of nasal polyps: are there any surprises? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 26:321–323
Alvi A, Vartanian AJ (1998) Microscopic examination of routine tonsillectomy specimens: is it necessary? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 119:361–363
Garavello W, Gaini RM (2005) Histopathology of routine nasal polypectomy specimens: a review of 2, 147 cases. Laryngoscope 115:1866–1868
Diamantopoulos II, Jones NS, Lowe J (2000) All nasal polyps need histological examination: an audit-based appraisal of clinical practice. J Laryngol Otol 114:755–759
van den Boer C, Brutel G, de Vries N (2010) Is routine histopathological examination of FESS material useful? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:381–384
Alun-Jones T, Hill J, Leighton SE, Morrissey MS (1990) Is routine histological examination of nasal polyps justified? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 15:217–219
Romashko AA, Stankiewicz JA (2005) Routine histopathology in uncomplicated sinus surgery: is it necessary? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:407–412
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yaman, H., Alkan, N., Yilmaz, S. et al. Is routine histopathological analysis of nasal polyposis specimens necessary?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268, 1013–1015 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1534-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1534-x