Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of background noise on recording of portable transient-evoked otoacoustic emission in newborn hearing screening

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transient-evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) is a well-established screening tool for universal newborn hearing screening. The aims of this study are to measure the effects of background noise on recording of TEOAE and the duration required to complete the test at various noise levels. This study is a prospective study from June 2006 until May 2007. The study population were newborns from postnatal wards who were delivered at term pregnancy. Newborns who were more than 8-h old and passed a hearing screening testing using screening auditory brainstem response (SABRe™) were further tested with TEOAE in four different test environments [isolation room in the ward during non-peak hour (E1), isolation room in the ward during peak hour (E2), maternal bedside in the ward during non-peak hour (E3) and maternal bedside in the ward during peak hour (E4)]. This study showed that test environment significantly influenced the time required to complete testing in both ears with F [534.23] = 0.945; P < 0.001 on the right ear and F [636.54] = 0.954; P < 0.001 on the left. Our study revealed that TEOAE testing was efficient in defining the presence of normal hearing in our postnatal wards at maternal bedside during non-peak hour with a specificity of 96.8%. Our study concludes that background noise levels for acceptable and accurate TEOAE recording in newborns should not exceed 65 dB A. In addition, when using TEOAE assessment in noisy environments, the time taken to obtain accurate results will greatly increase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davis A, Bradfort J, Wilson I, Ramkalawam T, Forshew M, Wright S (1997) A critical review of the role of neonatal hearing screening in the detection of congenital hearing impairment. Health Technol Assess 1:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fortnum HM, Summerfield Q, Marshall DH (2001) Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal screening: questionnaire based ascertainment study. Br Med J 323:1–6. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7312.536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdullah A, Long CW, Saim L, Mukari SZM (2005) Sensitivity and specificity of portable transient otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) in newborn hearing screening. Med J Malaysia 60:1

    Google Scholar 

  4. (1993) National Institutes of Health Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and younger children, vol 11(1). National Institutes of Health, Maryland, pp 1–24

  5. Kemp PT (1978) Stimulated acoustic emission from the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 64:1386–1391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Headley GM, Campbell DE, Gravel JS (2000) Effect of test environment on recording transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Am Acad Pediatr 105(6):1279–1285

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Widen JE, Folsom RC, Sininger Y, Cone-Wesson B, Vohr BR, Mascher K, Fletcher K (2000) Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance. Ear Hear 21(5):508–528. doi:10.1097/00003446-200010000-00013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rhoades K, McPherson B, Smyth V, Kei J, Baglioni A (1998) Effects of background noise on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 19(6):450–462. doi:10.1097/00003446-199812000-00006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stone KA, Smith BD, Lembke JM, Clark LA, McLellan MB (2000) Universal newborn hearing screening. J Fam Pract 49(11):1012–1016

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gorga MP, Norton SJ, Sininger YS, Cone-Wesson B, Folsom RC, Vohr BR, Widen JE, Neely ST (2000) Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: distortion product otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period. Ear Hear 21(5):400–424. doi:10.1097/00003446-200010000-00007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK (1993) The influence of noise on the measured amplitudes of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res 36:1097–1102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kemp PT, Ryan S, Bray P (1990) A guide to the effective used of otoacoustic emission. Ear Hear 11:93–105. doi:10.1097/00003446-199004000-00004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Capua B, De Felice C, Constantinin D, Bagnoli F, Passli D (2003) Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 23(1):16–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jacobson JT, Jacobson CA (1994) The effects of noise in transient evoked otoacoustic emissions newborn hearing screening. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 29:235–248. doi:10.1016/0165-5876(94)90170-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Husain Salina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salina, H., Abdullah, A., Mukari, S.Z.Ms. et al. Effects of background noise on recording of portable transient-evoked otoacoustic emission in newborn hearing screening. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267, 495–499 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-1080-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-1080-y

Keywords

Navigation