References
Vercellino GF, Erdemoglu E, Chiantera V et al (2014) Clinical relevance of objectifying colposcopy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. doi:10.1007/s00404-014-3518-8 [Epub ahead of print]
Huh WK, Sideri M, Stoler M, Zhang G, Feldman R, Behrens CM (2014) Relevance of random biopsy at the transformation zone when colposcopy is negative. Obstet Gynecol 124:670–678
Massad LS, Jeronimo J, Katki HA et al (2011) The accuracy of colposcopic grading for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Low Genit Tract Dis 13:137–144
Siegler E, Bornstein J (2011) Loop electrosurgical excision procedures in Israel. Gynecol Obstet Invest 72:85–89
Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285–1293
Pretorius RG, Belinson JL (2012) Colposcopy. Minerva Ginecol 64:173–180
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This comment refers to the article available at doi:10.1007/s00404-014-3518-8 and an author’s reply to this comment is available at doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3620-6.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giannella, L. The clinical problem of colposcopy is represented by false-negatives. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291, 711–712 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3619-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3619-z