Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perioperative and postoperative complications after Ophira mini sling operations

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate perioperative and postoperative complications of mini sling operations in the surgical treatment of female urinary incontinence.

Methods

The study was comprised of 151 female patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or mixed incontinence (MUI) with predominant SUI patients who underwent the mini sling procedure. The duration of the follow-up ranged from 6 to 21 months. All women had positive cough stress tests preoperatively. The procedure was performed under local (86.1 %) or spinal anesthesia (13.9 %) with the same mini slings for all cases. Patients were examined in the outpatient clinic at 1 and 6 months after surgery.

Results

The mean age was 49 years old (SD 10) with a range of 26–82. Of the 151 patients, 42 (27.8 %) presented MUI, while 109 (72.2 %) presented SUI. Mean parity was 3 ± 1. Mean body mass index was 28.9 ± 3.5. 60 (39.7 %) of the cases were postmenopausal. There were 73 women who participated in 6 months follow-ups and 78 women who did 1-year follow-ups. The mean operating time was 13 ± 3.1 min. There were no major intraoperative complications due to mini sling surgery. 120 (79.5 %) patients were discharged the day following the surgery. Ten patients (6.1 %) had de novo urge incontinence in their post-operative follow-ups which was resolved using anti-cholinergic drugs. Two patients (1.2 %) required sling sections due to prolonged bladder outlet obstruction. There were 15 patients that complained about de novo dyspareunia (9.9 %). Vaginal mesh extrusion was reported in 18 (11.9 %) patients. The mean preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin concentrations were 12.9 ± 1.3 and 12.5 ± 1.3 g/dL, respectively.

Conclusion

The mini sling system can be considered an easy and effective method for treating stress urinary incontinence without major complication rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ogah J, Cody DJ, Rogerson L (2011) Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review. Neurourol Urodyn 30(3):284–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith P, Arunkalaivanan A, Baptiste M (2011) Single-ıncision midurethral tape (Ophira™) vs. Transobturator Tape (Obtryx™): prospective comparative study at a median follow-up of 6 months. 36th Annual Meeting of the International Urogynecological Association. Lisbon, Portugal. Abstract#181 Int Urogynecol J vol 22, Supplement 1. City Hosp., Birmingham, pp 1–195

  3. Enzelsberger H, Cemer I, Kostersitz E, Enzelsberger S (2011) Ophira® (Minisling) versus Monarc® (Tot): a prospective randomized study for the treatment of female stress urinary ıncontinence at a follow-up of 20 months. 36th Annual Meeting of the International Urogynecological Association. Abstract#281. Lisbon, Portugal

  4. Cetinel B, Ozkan B, Can G (2004) The validation study of ICIQ-SF Turkish version. Turkish J Urol 30(3):332–338

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cam C, Sakalli M, Ay P, Cam M, Karateke A (2007) Validation of the short forms of the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) and the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) in a Turkish population. Int Urogynecol J 26(1):129–133

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leanza V, Intagliata E, Leanza A, Ferla F, Leanza G, Vecchio R (2014) Comparison between three mini-sling surgical procedures and the traditional transobturator vaginal tape technique for female stress urinary incontinence. G Chir 35(3–4):80–84

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Palma P, Riccetto C, Reges R, Fraga R, Miyaoka R, Hermann V, Marcondes T (2008) Arcus to arcus microsling: technique and preliminary results. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1133–1136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Petros PE, Richardson P (2005) Midurethral tissue fixation systemsling—a micromethod for cure of stress incontinence—preliminary report. Aust N Z J Obstet Gyn 45:372–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Foglia G, Mistrangelo E, Lijoi D, Alessandri F, Ragni N (2006) Transfacial vaginal tape for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Urology 68:423–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Djehdian et al (2010) Randomised trial of Ophira mini-sling system and Unitape for the treatment of stres incontinence in women. First experiences after a follow up of 6 months. Int Urogynecol J 21:1–428

    Google Scholar 

  11. Palma P, Riccetto C, Castro R, Altuna S, Herrmann V, Miyaoka R (2011) Safety and efficacy of the ophira mini-sling system: one year follow-up from a multicenter ınternational clinical trial. Urotoday Int J 4(3):art44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ozkan A, Kumtepe Y, Delibaşİ B (2012) Efficacy of mini sling system in the management of stres incontinence:1 year follow-up data. Res J Med Sci 6(5):243–246

    Google Scholar 

  13. Neuman M (2008) Perioperative complications and early follow-up with 100 TVT-SECUR procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(4):480–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Riccetto C, Miyaoka R, de Fraga R, Barbosa R, Dambros M, Teixeira A et al (2008) Impact of the structure of polypropylene meshes in local tissue reaction: in vivo stereological study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1117–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kobashi KC, Dmochowski R, Mee SL, Mostwin J, Nitti VW, Zimmern PE et al (1997) Erosion of woven polyester pubovaginal sling. J Urol 162:2070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Comiter CV, Colegrove PM (2004) High rate of vaginal extrusion of silicone coated polyester sling. Urology 63:1066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Clemens JQ, DeLancey JO, Faerber GJ, Westney OL, Mcguire EJ (2000) Urinary tract erosions after synthetic pubovaginal slings: diagnosis and management strategy. Urology 56:589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moore RD (2008) Mini-sling: new minimally invasive one-incision sling for treatment of female stress urinary ıncontinence. Eur Urol Rev 3(1):77–80

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gauruder-Burmester A, Popken G (2009) The MiniArc© sling system in the treatment of female stress urinary ıncontinence. Int Braz J Urol 35:334–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Palma P, Riccetto C, Bronzatto E, Castro R, Altuna S (2014) What is the best indication for single-incision Ophira Mini Sling? Insights from a 2-year follow-up international multicentric study. Int Urogynecol J 25(5):637–643

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gülin Okay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taner, C.E., Okay, G., Göklü, Y. et al. Perioperative and postoperative complications after Ophira mini sling operations. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291, 341–346 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3402-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3402-6

Keywords

Navigation